|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM Original message |
DANGER! No Roe v. Wade= RNC Controls Regional Elections 4Ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's not happening now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. regardless of roe v wade, what you decribe is allready happening... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Imagine what is happening now exponential. Roe v. Wade limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. The only way this will ever stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. It doesn't matter - red states are already limiting and restricting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigYawn (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 02:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. UR correct, Roe will never be overturned, but restrictions will increase, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Actually, you have demonstrated why there is no need to worry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Punishing women in "a few red states" is not a good way to get votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Punishing...? Oh, Bridget, you are too hysterical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It depends on what your think "punishing" is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Well, what do you know...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. The sentence about Prohibition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 06:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. I don’t think we will have to face that situation either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. "transient loss of liberty"? Tell me, sir, which of your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Actually, I don't think anyone would be giving up a... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-16-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You may agree but my point was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-16-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I do see your point, but I really don't think you have anything to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-16-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I don't think just enacting legislation at the national level will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Yes, legislation can be overturned, but so can... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. "in advance of the procedure" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I guess I didn't make my point very understandable. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 12:03 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Yes, that is hypothetical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 09:26 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Apples and oranges... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. It is interesting to note that you didn't answer my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I didn't answer your question because it has nothing to do with Roe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Where in the Constitution does it refer to a right to use a condom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Condoms are property and you are your property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 03:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. The lege can also decide that condoms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 07:46 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. You seem to be suggesting that the majority... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 09:02 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. I would love to think that about legislatures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. I do think that about legislatures; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tenshi816 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 06:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. In your scenario, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 07:42 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. In some cases, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Blonde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Re: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-16-06 08:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I've never understood this logic - that our liberties are not guarantees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No..., |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Women in those states already have to drive hundreds of miles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 09:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
35. Hey.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. No Roe v. Wade will mean loss of medical autonomy for fertile women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneoftheboys (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. You are absolutely right. Some states would... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-13-06 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
11. Mmmm, stealth candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
14. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
18. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-14-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Dont forget segregation. They care about that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hong Kong Cavalier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
32. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
36. This will occurr in red states.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 04:17 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Abortion buses? That will be outlawed, too. Fetus will be a "citizen". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. sorry....but if I live in a dry county...it's still legal for me to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Don't you think the RWers have already figured out what to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. Lookie! Ohio bill makes it felony to cross state line for abortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. I'm sure one could go for a vacation and happen to have an abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffersons Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. In Alabama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 11:49 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I would say it's a privacy issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. who in the prochoice community says privacy is unimportant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. If you argure about choice, you have already conceded privacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Then why do we have the Bill of Rights that says "Congress shall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. The founders stated in their documents that we HAVE these rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-23-06 08:07 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. So when Roe is overturned all we have to do is assert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greiner3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-21-06 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
55. I thought that Roe would be the first to go; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC