|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
henslee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:22 AM Original message |
Failure to filibuster even if just symbolic will come back to haunt Dems.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is the time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. Agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. the dry powder is losing its effectiveness - use it or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. Perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. Haunt them? They'll be ghosts if they don't do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. And if a 3rd party ever again gains traction, it will be a talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
7. I don't think we should filibuster just for the sake of filibustering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Yes. Having the votes to filibuster would be symbolic itself. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No having the votes to filibuster WOULD be a filibuster! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC