Palace Revolt (Bush appointees wanted to rein in pres. power)

They were loyal conservatives, and Bush appointees. They fought a quiet battle to rein in the president's power in the war on terror. And they paid a price for it. A NEWSWEEK investigation. (snip)


These Justice Department lawyers, backed by their intrepid boss Comey, had stood up to the hard-liners, centered in the office of the vice president, who wanted to give the president virtually unlimited powers in the war on terror. Demanding that the White House stop using what they saw as farfetched rationales for riding rough-shod over the law and the Constitution, Goldsmith and the others fought to bring government spying and interrogation methods within the law. They did so at their peril; ostracized, some were denied promotions, while others left for more comfortable climes in private law firms and academia. Some went so far as to line up private lawyers in 2004, anticipating that the president's eavesdropping program would draw scrutiny from Congress, if not prosecutors. These government attorneys did not always succeed, but their efforts went a long way toward vindicating the principle of a nation of laws and not men. (snip)

worth the read.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11079547/site/newsweek/

"ding that the White House stop using what they saw as farfetched rationales for riding rough-shod over the law and the Constitution, Goldsmith and the others fought to bring government spying and interrogation methods within the law."

and no one is screaming "within the law?" from the rooftops demanding impeachment proceedings is beyond me! So you mean to tell me that MSNBC is willing to admit that what Bush is doing is not "within the law" and yet they still support him? WTF?

:banghead:

Thanks!!! Good read.Kick.

thanks for the kick! This sucka keeps sinking, and it's important!

very informative.

everyone needs to vote up the article too. Thanks!