|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 10:26 AM Original message |
Do the Democrats have a chance of winning back the Senate....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think it depends on what Alito does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mntleo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. No! Dem-o-pubs Blew It Big Time Yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hyernel (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
3. Only if Diebold and ES&S voting machines can be neutralized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 12:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. not only the voting machines, but all of the other fraudulent . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well, at least Bernie Saunders should get in, God willing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Not competitive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. my local congresswomen sue kelly, is not looking too challenged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Talismom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
6. No. Just face it and keep working, the answer is no. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DELUSIONAL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. No -- not for 20 or 30 years -- if ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. yes ..they just have to play as Dirty as the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. Current makeup of the Senate: 55 Republicans, 44 Democrats, 1 Indy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 12:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. And only one-third of the Senate runs every two years.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC