Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time's up!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saberjet22 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 09:26 PM
Original message
Time's up!
This is beyond belief.
President Bush, a criminal, has admitted in public that he has been defying the constitution with his domestic spying program.
His oath of office swears him to support and defend the constitution, but he is doing the opposite. He is destroying the fabric of this country and is in blatant violation of his oath of office.
This is a simple equation, requiring Bush's impeachment. No debate necessary.It transcends party lines. This law-breaking president must be impeached, without question. Now!
Why isn't this happening? Why isn't every congressperson pushing for immediate impeachment? Now! What does this say about the people who make up our congress? There's not many I'd care to shake hands with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On Par Donating Member (912 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doing What's Good For The People....
...is no longer the consideration. Doing what's good for themselves is "All" that it's about.

The NSA scandal is just one of a long line of impeachable offenses beginning with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good link outlining the crimes: Worth a look!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. the man needs to be impeached now!
Fewer than 10 U.S. citizens or residents a year, according to an authoritative account, have aroused enough suspicion during warrantless eavesdropping to justify interception of their domestic calls, as well. That step still requires a warrant from a federal judge, for which the government must supply evidence of probable cause.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11169129/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC