Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the Difference Between Liberals & Progressives?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 04:55 AM
Original message
What is the Difference Between Liberals & Progressives?
or is there a difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. probably a semantic difference, but basically the same.
I use them interchangably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. One has more "forward-looking," with-the-times, "hip" connotation which
the young (and habitually cautious more elderly) might resist by our OLD 'nametag' ... "Liberal." But we better start promoting it quick, IF we plan to accept it, incorporate it...before the Right bashes it into oblivion...as they have with "Liberal."

Linguistically, "Progressive" has a positive, forward-looking feel. And slight subliminal, reminiscent connection to FDR, and the Progressive party which grew out of his administration. (An idea which clearly thenahead of its time...but NOW maybe worth re-examining.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. liberals have basically a different approach
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 05:36 AM by tocqueville
they emphasize on the individual, progressives on the community

if you go back to the origins of the concepts, they are very different. in Europe a liberal is considered as practically a neo-con, in the US it's kind of a pinko commie through the right wing propaganda...

It has to do with the extremes on both sides. It's striking that even liberals talk about "small government", "protection from government" etc... progressives at least in an European sense, see government as an asset because if the government works honestly for the people's "pursuit of happiness", it will REGULATE the bad side effects of a society completely based on free enterprise.

Progressives ask more from their government not less.

"Progressivism is a political philosophy whose adherents promote public policies that they believe would lead to positive social change. As a broad characterization of political leanings, political progressivism mostly refers to social liberalism, social democracy, or green politics." (Wikipedia)

the distinction is difficult to make when it comes to SOCIAL-LIBERALISM. But a "true" LIBERAL is a market-liberal,
not very far from libertarianism which is a conservative trend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Both Liberals and Progressives
hold reform and the protection of civil liberties as a very important part of their belief system. Rush Limbaugh, the Neocons and corporate media openly managed to alter the definition for both groups. That`s why, in the presidential election of 2004, the debate turned to issues like whether or not a person attended church regularly rather than whether or not we should approve of a single mother working for $5.50 an hour while the CEO made millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am not sure but my family were progressives and in the GOP
Even I can not figure that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think some want to avoid the "negative" connotation
that "liberal" has been tagged with by the Repigs(rather successfully, I might add)
so they call themselves "progressive." I think it is a cop out for them. I CONTINUE to call myself LIBERAL and proud of it!


I know the other explanations in this thread are also correct, but for some, I DO feel that the above is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. "I CONTINUE to call myself LIBERAL and proud of it!"
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 08:17 AM by Popol Vuh
Yes!!

I am right there with you MoJoWorkin. I've never given-up on proclaiming myself as a "LIBERAL". I've always worn it as a badge of honor when people such as that racist neo-con Rush Limbaugh have referred to it in derogatory terms.




    When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful,
    A miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical.

    And all the birds in the trees, well they’d be singing so happily,
    Joyfully, playfully watching me.

    But then they send me away to teach me how to be sensible,
    Logical, responsible, practical.

    And they showed me a world where I could be so dependable,
    Clinical, intellectual, cynical.

    There are times when all the world’s asleep,
    The questions run too deep
    For such a simple man.

    Won’t you please, please tell me what we’ve learned
    I know it sounds absurd
    But please tell me who I am.

    Now watch what you say or they’ll be calling you a radical,
    "LIBERAL", fanatical, criminal.


    Won’t you sign up your name, we’d like to feel you’re
    Acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable!

    At night, when all the world’s asleep,
    The questions run so deep
    For such a simple man.

    Won’t you please, please tell me what we’ve learned
    I know it sounds absurd

    But please tell me who I am.


    :) :) :)





Sorry, but this song was actually just playing on my i-tunes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I have no problems calling myself liberal but..
..I think the term progressive stems from the old Progressive Party back in the early 1900's.

In terms of definition, they are essentially the same - I think it has just become a term some people use so as not to be saddled with the dreaded "L" word (which I think is rediculous).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. That is Exactly It
Liberals are running scared of the word. The ideals are the same. Let's not allow them to make us ashamed of who we are. We should stop using the word progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well I have a good "Liberal" blue wrist band
Have not seen a "Progressive" one. :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Accroding to Wikipedia
In the Democratic Party:
Progrssive:
Many progressives are descendants of the New Left of Democratic Presidential candidate/Senator George McGovern of South Dakota; others were involved in the presidential candidacies of Vermont Governor Howard Dean and U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio. Progressive Democratic candidates for public office have had popular support as candidates in urban areas, the Northeast, the Midwest, and among African-Americans nationwide, though they have also been supported by other groups. Unifying issues among progressive Democrats have been opposition to the War in Iraq, opposition to economic and social conservatism, opposition to heavy corporate influence in government, support for universal healthcare and steering the Democratic Party in the direction of being a more forceful opposition party. Compared to other factions of the party, they've been most critical of the Republican Party, and most supportive of social and economic equality.

Progressive Democrats have included congressmen Kucinich, Congressman John Conyers (Michigan), Jim McDermott (Washington), John Lewis (Georgia), the late Senator Paul Wellstone (Minnesota).

Liberals:
Liberal Democrats are to the left of centrist Democrats. The liberal faction was dominant in the party for several decades, although they have been hurt by the rise of centrist forces such as President Bill Clinton. Compared to conservatives and moderates, liberal Democrats generally have advocated fair trade and other less conservative economic policies, and a less militaristic foreign policy, and have a reputation of being more forceful in pushing for civil liberties. Liberals are increasingly identified as being part of the larger progressive wing of the party.

Prominent liberal Democrats include U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer (California), Russ Feingold (Wisconsin), Ted Kennedy (Massachusetts), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Joe Biden (Delaware) and House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi (California).

I tend to be mostly Liberal but on the Progressive side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Conservative wrap themselves in the Flag and burn the Constitution
Liberals wrap themselves in the Constitution and burn the Flag..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holdyourbreath Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. your question underscores that labels are counterproductive...
unfortunately, that's the nature of language, sometimes. As Jefferson (or was it Madison?) said: "Political parties are the most dangerous thing we could have." ....obviously these last 5 years proved them right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Historically
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 04:30 PM by Radical Activist
Progressives were considered to be more to the left, even socialists might call themselves progressive along with far-left wingers and other assorted liberals. Progressives were also more of an urban movement than their populist counterparts.

More recently its a term to use in place of liberal since that has become a dirty word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. depends on who you ask
and which term they personally prefer... or so I have come to find when reading different folks making the distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. David Sirota wrote a piece on this a couple months ago
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 10:53 PM by greendog
"It seems to me that traditional "liberals" in our current parlance are those who focus on using taxpayer money to help better society. A "progressive" are those who focus on using government power to make large institutions play by a set of rules.

To put it in more concrete terms - a liberal solution to some of our current problems with high energy costs would be to increase funding for programs like the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). A more "progressive" solution would be to increase LIHEAP but also crack down on price gouging and pass laws better-regulating the oil industry's profiteering and market manipulation tactics. A liberal policy towards prescription drugs is one that would throw a lot of taxpayer cash at the pharmaceutical industry to get them to provide medicine to the poor; A progressive prescription drug policy would be one that centered around price regulations and bulk purchasing in order to force down the actual cost of medicine in America (much of which was originally developed with taxpayer R&D money)."

More:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/whats-the-difference-bet_b_9140.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. These are the same things and these eloquent distinctions distract from
the Big Picture people need to face RIGHT NOW.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. None that I'm aware of
other than perhaps "progressive" is a term that liberals who have bought into the "liberal is a dirty word" BS use for themselves. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. The words have seperate origins, but now have the same meaning.
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 12:20 AM by Odin2005
"Liberal" origininally refered to (and in Europe, still does)what we would call Libertarian. Progressives were the US equivalent of the more moderate Social Democrats over in Europe. Because of our 2-party system the two terms came to mean the same thing when both came under the umbrella of the New Deal coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. after reading these posts i think i have come to a conclusion
i have always been rather fond of the term liberal (as a couple people said--it's a badge of honor in a way)

i would hate to give that up (even if just mentally by altering my political definition as to how i see myself)

and how does one decide between conyers (progressive) and kennedy (liberal) according to the definition? i see them as both being such positive forces in this country--and so terribly needed.

but perhaps, from my understanding at this point a progressive is one who sees the liberal (like betting in a game of poker--see meaning match) and then takes it up a notch--to the next step, progresses it to the next level

humm....i think i will begin thinking of myself as either a liberal progressive or a progressive liberal. (sure it's a long term--a lot longer than calling oneself a dem--but the dem party is the one that encompasses the pl or lp.)

(can one use these terms interchangeably like that?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think you'll get as many answers
as responders; everyone seems to have a different idea.

I think of "progressive" as more "active" than liberal; it's an "action" word. It's about moving forward, making progress on issues. Finding new ways to accomplish goals.

Of course, that can apply to any position on any issue; to any goal. Which is why "progressive" does not have to equal "liberal" in ideology.

In reality, most who currently claim to be "progressive" are left of center, and perhaps left of "liberal."

I wish the Democratic Party were the party of progressive liberals, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. I am seeing more RW attacks on "progressives"
lately. I think they have awakened to the fact that more and more liberals are calling themselves progressives and it is having an effect on the middle of the roaders. Betcha we'll see more dissing of progressives as we near the 06 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC