He also engages in a little inflation of his record elsewhere:
January 31, 2004
Democrats Assail, and Tap, 'Special Interests'By GLEN JUSTICE and JOHN TIERNEY
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/politics/campaign/31DONA.html?pagewanted=print&position=While Senator John Kerry regularly promises to stand up to "big corporations," his campaign has taken money from executives on Wall Street and those representing the telecommunications industry, which is under his purview in Congress. Mr. Kerry denounces President Bush for catering to the rich, but he has depended more heavily on affluent donors than the other leading Democrats except for another populist, Senator John Edwards. Mr. Kerry's spokeswoman, Stephanie Cutter, said the contributions had no effect on his votes.
Note: That's pretty much what they all say, isn't it?Kerry raps K Street But senator cozy with lobbyists, tooBy Alexander Bolton
http://www.thehill.com/news/011404/kerry.aspxTo energize his flagging presidential campaign, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) has taken recently to denouncing inside-the-Beltway corruption and influence peddling.
Last Friday in New Hampshire, he railed against the influence of lobbyists and pledged to shine light “on the secret deals in Washington.”
But during his Senate career, Kerry has helped special interests, even against the apparent interests of his own constituents. This helped cement ties with lobbyists who donated thousands of dollars to his campaign.
Looks like the same wink, wink, nod, nod type of tough talk George W. Bush engages in.Kerry Leads in Lobby Money Anti-Special-Interest Campaign Contrasts With Funding
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64727-2004Jan30.html?nav=hptop_tbBy Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 31, 2004; Page A01
Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who has made a fight against corporate special interests a centerpiece of his front-running campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, has raised more money from paid lobbyists than any other senator over the past 15 years, federal records show.
Looks like a pattern to me. The kind they call hypocrisy. It's definitely a fair campaign issue. He is, after all, the one who touts a record that just isn't there.