no
so today I'm asking HOW can we sue the media for withholding info and knowingly changing info?
what makes me bring up the idea again was this KOS article:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/2/10/171218/386The NOAA & the White House
If you saw climate scientists on the cable news shows and in the paper shortly after Katrina claiming that global warming wasn't a factor in the increased number of hurricanes last fall, odds are, you saw what one expert source told me was 'the most disgusting example of politically motivated deliberate disinformation I've ever witnessed".
-snip-
Just as an example of one of the ways the wool can be pulled over the eyes of the public; conflate 'hurricane' with 'storm'. The number of tropical depressions forming off the coast of Africa won't be changed by localized warming in the western Atlantic and Gulf. But any storms that subsequently pass over those waters will most certainly be affected. A tropical depression may become a category 1 Hurricane, a Category 1 may intensify to a Category 4. Therefore, since a hurricane is defined by intensity, it would be disingenuous to imply that warming would not increase the number of hurricanes.
-snip-
Reliable DarkSyde government climate science sources confirm to me that in their own experience, and to best of their knowledge about coworkers, scientists holding the consensus view, that warming is a factor in hurricane intensity, were effectively muzzled, while others who were willing to present a minority view among climate researchers and storm meteorologists were given the greenlight to appear on cable news in the aftermath of Katrina. Several have told me that they were more or less 'warned' not to talk to the press and the directives came through unofficial channels leaving no paper trail.
-snip-
--------------------------------
are we too stupid to figure out how to stop the bushmilhousegang media.
or, if not stop, then have an alternative media speaking out every time the bushmilhousegang media lied and spun.