Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

78 million Americans did not vote in 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tom Bombadil Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:15 PM
Original message
78 million Americans did not vote in 2004
according to this Washington Post article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10492-2005Jan14.html

That's nearly the entire population of Germany - Europe's most populous nation. Imagine, if like Australia, voting was compulsary. Would Bush still have won if everybody had to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are a nation of dumbshits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. maybe not...
I'm starting to feel like I'm the dumbshit now....not those that knew better than to trust any flavor of American Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So why don't you tune out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That was easier in the 60's when I had lots off access to drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, I hear ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. After seeing what we have as our leaders and the WWF type
of voting system, that may be a smart option to preserve sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berserker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Most of them
are in my family sad to say. They think I'm a frickin loon when I talk politics and in the same breath bitch about how things are. Which is where I chime in again. It's a never ending battle talking to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Bombadil Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. 40% of people
don't seem to give a shit about politics. That's a sad state of affairs in any democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:20 PM
Original message
Add the tens of thousands who did vote and their vote was stolen
Millions of votes...possibly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not a snow ball's chance in hell!!
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 09:21 PM by augie38
If every poor or working family member would vote, we'd have control of Gov't from now till doomsday.

Thats the republicans secret weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. That would have been enough to elect a completely different candidate.
...by a landslide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
39. Yep
A Mandate, if you will? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Che_Nuevara Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Your estimates are actually LOW.
This article only takes into account the percent of Americans ALLOWED to vote: ie, American citizens of legal voting age. The actual American population is around 290 million, including minors and resident aliens. The actual population of Germany is around 83 million, including minors and resident aliens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sad. People in Iraq risked their lives to vote...
and as Jon Stewart said, our people stay home if it's cloudy :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. That tells me that Rove was right! He got the Pubs to motivate
the Fundies to get out of the house, and they did! An additional 11 million plus votes for shrub than in 2000! That was the anti abortion/gay vote folks!

That Kerry won 8 million votes more than Gore in 2000 means that more Dems got out the door too, but not enough!

We HAVE to get the non voters out the damn door on election day!

Earlier today, I heard that 50 some million single mothers don't vote! Isn't that a strong group to woo? Get the message out to them about how much the Pubs have damaged their chances for survival, let alone success!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Che_Nuevara Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Notice that the anti-gay-marriage amendents
only appeared in combatted states like Ohio in 2004, and not in surefire Republican states like Texas.

They made the Presidential race into a coattail issue. They lured the voters out with gay marriage, and while they were there, as long as they were strongly defending their beliefs (homophobia), they might as well support the guy who would defend them (Bush).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Of course! I'm sure no political consultant! But I think the Dems have
to find something similar in 06 & 08 to do the same damn thing!

There are plenty of topics to choose from.

Spying on your emails and phone calls.
Packing the court to OT Roe.
Reducing taxes on the rich and putting all the burden on the middle class.
Selling out our domestic industries to foreign countries.
Cherry picking intelligence to foolishly invade another country.
Cutting funding to support out veterans.
Trying to destroy SS.
Reducing funding to Medicare and Medicaide.
In charge when Abu Gareb happened.
Claimed to have unitary authority to do anything.


Oh, I could go on, and on.

We need to pick one that will resonate with the majority of the American people, and SCARE them enough to make sure they take the Pubs out of power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. The anti gay amendments
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 09:21 PM by fujiyama
appeared all over the nations, including very red states. But I agree that these wedge issues were especially effective in getting fundies out to the polls.

The sad thing is though, that these measures passed even in so called blue states like OR and MI.

Here are the ballot measures from '04:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/ballot.measures/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Far fewer will vote in the next two elections.
I expect the total number of voters to be down by about 20%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Bombadil Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Why do you say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. I am led to that conclusion after talking to many r/w fundies
as well as their more liberal counterparts.
The fundie bunch seems to be willing to let up on the pressure, now that they have their "prize." The unexpected demise of the chief justice and the selection of double ought gage brained Alito have given them the make up of scotus they have been dreaming of for thirty years.
The dems seem to be pretty generally disheartened, disillusioned, and defeatist. In spite of the tremendous work that was done, the phenomenal effort expended and large voter turnout, the criminals are still in power. The "why bother" syndrome is pretty thick and many are in even worse shape than they were two years ago.

I think, as of right now, anyway, the rethugs are fairly well accepting of the fact that they will be out of power in three years, but that doesn't seem to bother them much.

Of course, things may change, but that describes what I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I tend to agree with this view of the Dems
it's pretty clear to me that we can't win any election we need to at this point, be it from propaganda, election theft, or whathaveyou. The small group we are represented by in DC in unable/unwilling to pursue acts which are clearly treasonous. I won't be sending any money this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Then America got the government they wanted.
The largest group of voters said, "I don't give a damn who runs this country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. And that's just those that didn't try to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'd imagine it'd be lower...
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 09:38 PM by Todd B
..if we constantly didn't have to choose between "evil" and "slightly less evil".

Just a guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. Well that wasn't the choice in 2004. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. More BS. This is all about registered voters. Only 36% of ELIGIBLE
voters voted. This is a figure I worked out at the last election. That means only 18% are running this country and only 18% care enough to vote against the nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. Better figure that again.
There were over 122 million voters in the 2004 election, and the US population in 2004 was about 295 million, so that means about 41% of the entire population voted. The percentage of eligible voters who voted was around 60%.

http://elections.gmu.edu/Voter_Turnout_2004.htm

Maybe you did your calculations for the 2002 midterm elections, which had a turnout of 35-40% of eligible voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I actually got the percentage from the news. They use to talk a lot
about it years ago, but lately they've been quite on it. I did try to go see if those figures were correct and couldn't find them. I did find out that 219 million were over 21 years of age. I am suprised so many did vote, because for years the number has been very low. Thanks for your input.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Apparently they felt they had nothing different to vote FOR
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 11:02 PM by Clarkie1
except choosing the least uninspiring of the uninspirational.

And why get off your ass to do THAT?

The masses have spoken...we need a more original candidate in 08'.

Edit: we need a more original, outside-the-box, inspiring candidate with a CLEAR message of no more politics-as-usual. Why? Because the masses are tired of the tired old political parties and their figureheads. They are also tired of senate-speak and lawyer-speak. The only way they will feel it worthwhile to get off their asses is if they feel INSPIRED, and they are not people inspired by "career" politicians. So our best bet is a true patriot with the PROVEN ability to LEAD this nation to higher ground and truly CHANGE Washington and the way things are done in this country, not a another politico-as-usual.

When I say "lead this nation to higher ground" I mean it in more than a metaphorical sense. Americans trust neither Democrats nor Republicans to lead a functional government in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. To the vast majority of Americans, both parties have proven themselves equally inept.

First, people lose hope that any political party can lead a government better equipped to serve the people, then they become indifferent.

And so, we need a "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" type of candidate (Americans LOVE that movie). The historical moment demands it. Someone who has NEVER held political office and is thus perceived as GENUINE and UNCORRUPTED. Politicians and lawyers are they least popular people in this country...and usually they go together. Americans can spell them from a mile away and they generally don't like the scent.

And that, my friends, is why the masses sit on their asses. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. The nonvoters deserve more blame than the Bush voters.
If only a very small fraction of nonvoters had voted for Kerry, we wouldn't be talking about Bush right now.

There were many Kerry voters who weren't inspired by him, but who were inspired to remove Bush from office and voted for Kerry to achieve that.

Anyone who was eligible and had the ability and means to vote, but didn't, can't complain about what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I'm not interested in assigning blame to non-voters.
I'm interested in doing what it takes to motivate more non-voters to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Media. That's what it takes. Or, figure out how to get people to
go to rallies.

I was relatively "uninspired" by Kerry based on what slipped through the media filter. I liked him in the primary debates, which were relatively unfiltered, but after that I didn't see much. Until I went to a rally and saw how he really was totally different than the media portrayal.

So, if you want to motivate people, fix the megaphone, instead of only worrying about the candidate. Chances are you already have a good candidate, just not enough people are hearing him (or her).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. If the prospect of four more years of Bush wasn't enough...
then nothing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. Maybe the people that don't vote
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 02:17 AM by fujiyama
are just lazy and stupid.

I don't know what people expect of candidates. There were I believe 9 candidates running for president in the Dem party primaries alone in '04.

Not one single one inspired them? What happened under four years of Bush didn't excite them enough to want change? Hell, even the idiots that went FOR Bush make more sense. Those people atleast stood for SOMETHING.

People that don't vote should drink a big cup of "shut the fuck up". They don't even deserve the right to bitch about the state of the nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
23. I've been saying it until
I'm blue in the face, if we could only get a fraction of them. Christ the Diebold Donkey Kongs would burn up trying to scam that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. That's an appalling statistic.
I knew it was bad, but I had no idea that many eligible voters didn't bother to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Missouri is trying to disenfranchise another 200,000 or so
they are, like GA, trying to get around the voting rights act by requiring a driver's license to vote. I predict by November 2-3 million poor/black/Dem-leaning voters will have their right to vote encroached on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. That's part of the GOP strategy
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 07:03 PM by TOJ
they are helped immensely by low turnout.

Edit: and of course of it looks like turnout will be high, they have voter rol lpurges, defective machines, insufficient machines, poll "challengers", and FBI visits to black peoples' homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
38. And Yet, Sadly, 2000 and 2004 is Nader's fault to some. lol
Voter apathy is a huge problem.

I also think the party that taps into that market could possibly cripple the other party for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC