Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Congressmen Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) Connected to Money Laundering!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 07:51 PM
Original message
US Congressmen Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) Connected to Money Laundering!!!
(Look what I found buried at the bottom of this story from the BBC News!!!! "...The money laundering indictment stems from allegations he paid a US congressmen $23,000 (£13,215) for a movie script he had written...." This needs to be investigated further, don't ya think!?!?)

Saturday, 18 February 2006, 17:55 GMT

Actress linked to $5.5m 'TV scam'



<http://rohrabacher.house.gov/>

An actress has appeared in court in the US charged with lying to the FBI over an alleged scam to take $5.5m (£3.3m) from investors for a fake TV show.

Alison Heruth, 41, was charged as part of an investigation into Joseph Medawar who said he was producing a show about the Department of Homeland Security. He is alleged to have told more than 70 investors the show DHS: The Series had the backing of the White House. Ms Heruth is also charged with failing to report or stop a felony....

(clip)

'Overseas deals'

...She is alleged to have conducted interviews in which she said she was co-producing and starring in DHS. Prosecutors say Mr Medawar falsely claimed 26 episodes of the series were in post-production and that overseas deals had been finalised in more than 137 territories.

It is alleged he spent most of the money on cars, homes, jewellery and child care. He has pleaded not guilty to 23 counts of mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering and is free on $1m (£574,583) bail.

Assistant US attorney David Willingham David said Mr Medawar faced a prison term of up to 449 years if convicted on all counts. :hi:The money laundering indictment stems from allegations he paid a US congressmen $23,000 (£13,215) for a movie script he had written.

Southern California congressman Dana Rohrabacher :hi:said Mr Medawar convinced him and others he was planning to do the series and a patriotic movie based on his script.
"If he's found guilty, I'll certainly return the money that was raised fraudulently," said Mr Rohrabacher.

(full story at link below)

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4728030.stm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good...
I really would like to see him go to jail, after all his idiotic hardball appearances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I like it..."DHS: The Series"
A 26-episode Fox-TV extravaganza depicting our Department of Homeland Security in action...

Episode One...Katrina Blows Away New Orleans...A concerned Michael Chertoff (in which the embattled Homeland Security Czar appears, playing himself, in a cameo) sends an inexperienced Michael Brown (played by Peewee Herman) and his crack team of FEMA professionals to the Crescent City to handle cleanup and fight rape, looting, and gang violence in the Super Dome...

No wonder Rohrbacher was involved. It sounds like a sure winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. For your's they would need to get Ice-T to play Mayor Ray Nagan...
...Or they could make it a Comedy, it would fit better. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "inexperienced Michael Brown (played by Peewee Herman)"
good one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Figures! Here is a link to same story in LA Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Excellent! This report says ...at least five other Republican Congressmen!
This definitely needs more investigation!!!!


<http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medawar18feb18,0,3663093.story?coll=la-headlines-california>

...Records and interviews show that Rohrabacher was instrumental in helping Medawar promote the show because the Huntington Beach congressman thought it would bring positive attention to the Department of Homeland Security.

At the time of fundraising for the show, Medawar and Heruth had meetings with top GOP officials to discuss the show and touted that access to entice dozens of investors. The meetings included one 2004 gathering in Washington, D.C., with Rohrabacher and at least five other Republican congressmen and staff members from the House Homeland Security Committee.


"As the indictment alleges, Medawar used fraudulently obtained investor funds to buy access to government officials and others in an effort to promote this scheme," Assistant U.S. Atty. David Willingham said after the latest indictment.

On Friday, Rohrabacher said he still thought Medawar's idea for a television series had merit and he reserved judgment on the new charges facing the producer. "He is either a fraud or an incompetent producer, and Hollywood is filled with incompetent producers," Rohrabacher said. The congressman also denied that Medawar gained special access to government personnel by purchasing his 30-year-old script....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's more from the AP
(They are definitely trying to bury this!)


<http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/13901190.htm>

...The new charges include allegations that Medawar's company laundered money he received from investors for the bogus TV show by paying $23,000 to a Southern California congressman for a movie script the lawmaker wrote.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, introduced Medawar to at least five Republican congressmen and staff members at the House Homeland Security Committee in 2004. He told The Associated Press the script deal was approved by a House of Representative's ethics committee and that he believed the proposed show "was a great idea and is still a great idea."

"He convinced myself and a lot of people that he was planning to do this series, and do one ... patriotic movie a year," Rohrabacher said. "My script was going to be the first one."

Rohrabacher declined to comment further until a jury decides Medawar's fate. "If he's found guilty, I'll certainly return the money that was raised fraudulently," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. More from a local (LA) paper
<http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/2333391.html?showAll=y&c=y>

The payment to Rohrabacher, who represents sections of the Palos Verdes Peninsula and San Pedro, was first reported in November, but Friday was the first time it was directly linked to a criminal charge in the Medawar case. As he did in November, Rohrabacher acknowledged he helped set up meetings with officials in Washington for Medawar to help him with "DHS," but denied it was special treatment or that the screenplay purchase was an exchange for access.

The screenplay in question was for an action-adventure titled "Baja" that Rohrabacher initially wrote in the 1970s and has revised over the years. He has said he was familiar with Medawar's family, knew that Medawar had experience in the movie business and believed that he was sincere in producing a show about fighting terrorism.

"I felt that everything was on the up and up, otherwise I wouldn't have gone near it with a 10-foot pole," Rohrabacher said in a telephone interview. He said Medawar told him he wanted to produce a movie every year using the same production crew that shot "DHS" and inquired about "Baja."

"I honestly believed he was trying to do a TV series," Rohrabacher said. "I can't tell you right now ... if he was a fraud or an incompetent."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Didn't this fool have ties to the Taliban? I can't remember the
details but I have a recollection of his visit to Afghanistan when Omar was still in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I haven't found that yet, but he does have a big mouth, here's an Op-Ed
he currently has at the Washington Times: <http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060216-091234-9655r.htm>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. He's a piece of work, isn't he. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh wait, here it is! I can't personally vouch for the source...,
...but finding news from 1996 on the net is rather difficult:

<http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/1196/9611008.htm>

...A Disciplined Afghanistan

The potential rise to power of the Taliban does not alarm Rohrabacher, because the Taliban could provide stability in an area where chaos was creating a real threat to the U.S.
Rohrabacher says that under the previous situation Afghanistan was becoming a major source of drugs and a haven for terrorists “an anarchistic state of narco-terrorism.” In contrast, the Taliban leaders have already shown that they intend to establish a disciplined, moral society.

Rohrabacher calls the sensational media reporting of the “harsh” imposition of strict Islamic behavior, with the underlying implication that this somehow threatens the West, “nonsense.” He says the Taliban are devout traditionalists, not terrorists or revolutionaries, and, in contrast to the Iranians, they do not seem intent on exporting their beliefs. Rohrabacher would have preferred to see a negotiated compromise among the various factions (but with no role for Gulbuddin Hekmatyar) rather than a bloody confrontation. But in the absence of such a compromise, he believes a Taliban takeover would be a positive development.

An interesting speculation that we have not seen elsewhere was Rohrabacher’s pointing out that the Taliban are mostly Pushtuns from the Khandahar region of Afghanistan, and King Zahir Shah is also a Pushtun from Khandahar. Rohrabacher says that there is a major faction among the Taliban that supports the return of Zahir Shah, and Rohrbacher would not be surprised to see him return at some point if the Taliban establishes full control over the country. In this regard, during his meeting with Rohrabacher, General Dostam spoke in favor of the return of the King, and he has since made similar comments publicly.

Rohrabacher dismissed speculation from some quarters that a Taliban takeover would lead to increased Pakistani influence in Afghanistan, upsetting both India and Iran and leading to further instability in the area if either of those countries feel that Pakistan has gained significant control over Afghanistan. He said that Pakistan has learned, as did the British a century and a half ago, that no outside force can “control” the Afghans. He believes that India and Iran, as well as the new nations of former Soviet Central Asia, would soon enough learn that they have nothing to fear from a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.


<http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/1196/9611008.htm>

<http://maxblumenthal.blogspot.com/2004/06/more-on-republican-rep-dana.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. But WAIT, just over a month after the 9/11 attacks, he blamed Clinton...
...for not destroying the Taliban!

This guy is unbelievable, he must be reveled for the POS that he is:

Was Clinton pro-Taliban?


Congressman charges Afghan extremists were coddled, oversight efforts 'belittled'
Posted: October 31, 2001
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Joseph Farah
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

<http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25142>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Reaganite is going down!
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 11:13 AM by Independent_Liberal
MIRROR, MIRROR ON THE WALL, WHO'S THE MOST CORRUPT OF ALL?

I'm going to be chanting that all day.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Here's a few names of his associates: Jack Abramoff, "Duke" Cunningham...
I'm sure you could link him to everyone of those currently under investigation.

Plus he was the idiot who was pushing to put Reagan's face on the $20 dollar bill, back in 2004:

<http://money.cnn.com/2004/06/08/news/economy/reagan_hamilton/index.htm?cnn=yes>

The Jack Abrimoff link is in the article below. The link below was originally in a Knight-Ridder paper <http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/living/12041711.htm>, it's not there any more, but Axis of logic posted a copy:
<http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=133&num=18953>

Here's the Randy "Duke" Cunningham link:
<http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=59&num=8172>

Most of the links above are rather weak right now, but with a little research, I'm sure they could be stronger.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's a solid connectiont to Abramoff from "The Hill"
<http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012506/news2.html>

Abramoff, the triplets and the nanny fund


By Susan Crabtree

Before the lobbying scandal hit Washington and GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff was still one of the town’s most influential powerbrokers, it may have seemed like a normal, even run-of-the mill personal Washington event.

Abramoff, who recently pleaded guilty to fraud, bribery and tax evasion, helped host a baby shower for Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) and his wife in December 2003. The Rohrabachers were expecting triplets and feeling the pinch of the prevailing congressional salary of $154,700 at the time while maintaining homes in D.C. and the lawmaker’s pricey Southern California coastal district.

Abramoff’s and his wife’s names appeared on the invitation, with Reps. George Radanovich (R-Calif.) and Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) and their wives. The names of former Rep. David McIntosh (R-Ind.), who left Congress in 2001 and became a lobbyist at Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, also were listed as hosts.

The lobbyist, who had been friends with Rohrabacher since the early 1980s when the future lawmaker was a White House speechwriter and Abramoff was chairman of the College Republicans, allowed the couple to use his restaurant, Signatures, between lunch and dinner for the shower. Only hors d’oeuvres were served, Rohrabacher disclosed in a Los Angeles Times article two weeks ago.

(more at link below)

<http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012506/news2.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. More conections:Abramoff, DeLay, Cunningham ASG, Blackwater...
<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060220/scahill>
From "The Nation"
article | posted February 2, 2006 (February 20, 2006 issue)
Exile on K Street

Jeremy Scahill

In January the powerful Alexander Strategy Group shut down its public operations faster than merchants peddling pirated DVDs on Canal Street who hear the cops are on the way. The well-connected Republican lobbying firm, founded and run by former senior staffers of embattled ex-House majority leader Tom DeLay, explained that the publicity from the Jack Abramoff mega-scandal had fatally damaged its business. On the surface, it appears to be the fall of a major player in the GOP's K Street Project, which has made lobbying a highly partisan industry. But don't count out ASG: Already, according to the Washington Post, most of its lobbyists are setting up a "successor firm...."

(clip)

...While Abramoff, DeLay and Randy "Duke" Cunningham dominate the headlines in the current "lobbying scandal" media reports, ASG deserves to be heavily scrutinized for its role in each of those scandals and others not yet on the mainstream radar.

Just a few months ago it would have been difficult to predict ASG's downfall. The firm was enjoying a prosperous 2005, ranked as a top 25 lobbyist by National Journal, with revenues on a serious rise--up 34 percent in one year, to $8 million. In addition to powerhouses like PhRMA, Enron, TimeWarner, Microsoft and Eli Lilly, ASG counted among its clients over the years several evangelical Christian causes and organizations--among them, right-wing media operations like Salem Com munications, the National Religious Broadcasters and Grace News. ASG was also a quiet workhorse in procuring lucrative military contracts for some of its clients. Recently, ASG was on the cutting edge of one of the fastest-growing industries within the military world--private security. With the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, mercenaries have found themselves in high demand, scooping up lucrative contracts from the occupation forces, local politicians and foreign corporations. After Blackwater USA had four of its operatives killed in Falluja, in March 2004, it hired ASG to manage its newfound fame. This past September Blackwater forces were among the first to arrive in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, snagging profitable federal security contracts. Blackwater's press contact for its New Orleans operations was none other than Anne Duke, one of ASG's fourteen lobbyists. In other news stories it was Paul Behrends, a partner at ASG and a friend of Blackwater found er Erik Prince. Behrends, as it happens, was a longtime national security adviser to Representative Dana Rohrabacher of California, who incidentally has emerged as one of Abramoff's biggest defenders. A few months after hiring ASG in 2004, Black water's Prince and the company's president, Gary Jackson, both longtime GOP donors, made their first-ever contributions to DeLay. They also began contributing to several other ASG-favored lawmakers....

(more at link above)

<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060220/scahill>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Still not convinced? Here's an AEI artical he wrote re:The Vietnam Peace
...Movement. I might be jumping to conclutions, but it sounds like he didn't go either:

<http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.16179/article_detail.asp>

Us Young Americans for Freedom


By Dana Rohrabacher

...The Vietnam War undid a lot of conservative progress, at least temporarily. It was a war that went on and on—twice as long as World War II. Conservatives ended up supporting Lyndon Johnson out of respect for the commander in chief, even though he had foolishly decided on a slow war of attrition, which is both immoral and unwinnable when one’s adversary is a totalitarian regime with lots of helpful allies and little regard for the lives of its people.

What got ground down in Vietnam was the will of the American people. Well into the war, contrary to stereotypes, most Americans, including young people, supported taking a stand in Vietnam. The media painted the anti-war movement as being led by pacifists and idealists—an untrue stereotype. By and large, the organized effort against the war was steered by hardcore Marxists. These folks wanted not peace but a communist victory in Vietnam, and in the Cold War as well. The news media steadfastly ignored the philosophical commitments of the organizers of the "peace movement," and rarely showed the communist and Viet Cong flags that were flapping in the wind at every rally. Of all the personalities who emerged in the 1960s, it’s worth noting that only Joan Baez really was and remains an anti-war idealist, pacifist, and humanitarian.

While the media softened the ideology of left-wing activists, they ignored the conservatives altogether. Conservatives and libertarians were united by Goldwater’s pro-freedom, pro-America message. And after the 1964 election many of us active in Barry’s effort shifted into Young Americans for Freedom, which had been launched from Bill Buckley’s backyard in Sharon, Connecticut, in 1960. While the 1962 "Port Huron Statement" penned by the left-wing Students for a Democratic Society (sds) is regularly advertised as a landmark political proclamation, the Sharon Statement that founded yaf is perhaps the finest manifesto of freedom ever penned by American youth. (See box nearby.)

It’s significant that the youth organization of 1960s conservatives was named Young Americans for Freedom. Conservatives are nearly unstoppable when they rally behind a positive, pro-freedom message. Unfortunately, as the Vietnam War dragged on it became hard to maintain an idealistic pro-freedom agenda. Who can get excited about marching in a parade headed by Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon...?

(more at link below)

<http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.16179/article_detail.asp>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. More AEI writings from Congressman Rohrabacher (CA-R)

Face the Truth


By Dana Rohrabacher

The politics of immigration has been a lethal mix in this country. It's a combination of Republicans who capitulate to huge corporate interests wanting to keep wages down, and Democrats who are looking for a new underclass to justify their positions of expanding government programs, which of course gives them political power. Add to this mix the new McCarthyism-every time people attempt to discuss immigration, they are derided as racists. That tactic has harmed the honest debate of an issue vitally important to this country.

The Pollyannas and ostriches who advocate open borders want Congress to believe three things about their pending Social Security agreement with Mexico-all of which are false. First, proponents want us to believe that it will affect only a small number of people. The Social Security Administration claims the agreement will cover only 50,000 Mexicans. The administration came up with that figure by studying the number of Canadian illegal immigrants. The General Accounting Office has noted with remarkable understatement that the Canadian experience is not a good predictor of our immigration realities with Mexico.

We are talking about huge sums of money-not just for retirement, but for disability payments, premature deaths, caring for the families of illegal immigrants. This is a huge threat to Social Security, and it is an outrageous violation of our obligation to watch out for the senior citizens of the United States. I do not understand why every senior citizen organization in this country is not engaged in this debate. I suspect the answer is that they simply do not realize what is being proposed.

Supporters of totalization want you to believe that it will not become an inducement to further illegal immigration. I don't know whether anyone who makes those claims has taken Economics 101, but the reality is if you pay for something, more of it will be produced. If we spend more money to provide guaranteed lifelong benefits to illegal immigrants, there will be more illegal immigrants. Who in Mexico wouldn't choose to come to America and gain access to U.S. benefits dispensed at U.S. dollar levels, rather than relying on the corrupt and bankrupt retirement system in Mexico...?

(more at link above)

<http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.18344/article_detail.asp>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh, and here he claimed to have fought the Rooskies with the Mujahedin
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 07:48 PM by Up2Late
Oh brother!:eyes: :crazy:

Guest Commentary: September 18, 2001

Was U.S. Aiding the Taliban?


Editor's Note: A must read; you will be livid over the level of incompetency in our intelligence agencies
The Honorable Dana Rohrabacher

I worked in the White House during the years when Ronald Reagan brought an end to the Cold War, culminating with the dismantling of the communist dictatorship that controlled Russia and its puppet states. Essential to that great victory was President Reagan's support for various people who were fighting to free themselves from communist tyranny.

The bravest and most fierce of these anti-Soviet insurgents were in Afghanistan. The American people can be proud that we provided the Afghan people the weapons they needed to win their own freedom and independence. That Cold War battle was a major factor in breaking the will of the communist bosses in Moscow, thus ending the Cold War, making almost everyone on this planet in these last 10 years, especially in the Western democracies, safer and more prosperous....

(clip)

...After I left the White House and was elected to Congress, but before I was sworn into Congress, I knew I had that two months between November and January to do things that I could never do once I was elected to Congress. I chose to hike into Afghanistan as part of a small Mujahedin unit and to engage in a battle against the Russian and communist forces near and around the city of Jalalabad.

After the collapse of the Communist regime in Afghanistan, the Mujahedin factions who fought the Russians, but with no direction from the United States, began bickering and fighting among themselves. This went on for several years. Then, in 1996, a new force appeared, seemingly out of nowhere: the Taliban. These were fresh, well-equipped forces who had, by and large, sat out the war in Pakistan. They had been in Pakistan in what they called schools....

(more at link below)

<http://www.politicsol.com/guest-commentaries/2001-09-18.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC