Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Seeks to Clarify Testimony on Spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:53 PM
Original message
Gonzales Seeks to Clarify Testimony on Spying
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 10:54 PM by ProSense
Crooks! Liars!

Gonzales Seeks to Clarify Testimony on Spying

Extent of Eavesdropping May Go Beyond NSA Work

By Charles Babington and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, March 1, 2006; Page A08

Snip...

In a letter yesterday to senators in which he asked to clarify his Feb. 6 testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales also seemed to imply that the administration's original legal justification for the program was not as clear-cut as he indicated three weeks ago.

At that appearance, Gonzales confined his comments to the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program, saying that President Bush had authorized it "and that is all that he has authorized."

But in yesterday's letter, Gonzales, citing that quote, wrote: "I did not and could not address . . . any other classified intelligence activities." Using the administration's term for the recently disclosed operation, he continued, "I was confining my remarks to the Terrorist Surveillance Program as described by the President, the legality of which was the subject" of the Feb. 6 hearing.

At least one constitutional scholar who testified before the committee yesterday said in an interview that Gonzales appeared to be hinting that the operation disclosed by the New York Times in mid-December is not the full extent of eavesdropping on U.S. residents conducted without court warrants.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801587.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Backtracking
Forget it, Gonzales, we saw which side your bread is buttered on when you made your appearance. You do not defend the Constitution, nor do you defend the laws of this land. You are just as guilty as the ones you are protecting with your lies and non-answers.

I hope they take you down with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A K A Stone Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. he sucks
Gonzales sucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Welcome to DU. Looks like you admire Gonzales too. Not.
:hi: Have some :popcorn: and enjoy the show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy252 Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. He also had very poorly prepared talking points.
George Washington wiretapping. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clarifying means he lied originally.....
and he knows he'll get caught. This is a confession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's to clarify?
That asshat didn't say shit during his testimony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Clarify - means it started out being lies and Gonzales just piled.......
....a few more lies on top of the originals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Guard unit may be part of spying program
Why were they disbanded? Is the threat of terrorism over?

Posted on Wed, Mar. 01, 2006

Guard unit may be part of spying program



By EDWIN GARCIA
Knight Ridder Sacramento Bureau

SACRAMENTO - A special California National Guard unit that was disbanded last year amid suspicion it was engaged in domestic spying may have been part of a nationwide effort to monitor the activities of U.S. citizens, a state senator charged Tuesday.

Snip...

A Guard spokesman denied the allegations and said three independent investigations cleared the California National Guard's Information Synchronization, Knowledge Management and Intelligence Fusion unit. Spokesman Jon Siepmann also denied the program ever conducted surveillance on American citizens.

Officials at the National Guard Bureau in Washington, D.C., did not return telephone messages and e-mails.

The unit formed in California, first disclosed by the Mercury News in an article in June, had been given ''broad authority'' to monitor, analyze and distribute information on potential terrorist threats. Top Guard officials, the Mercury News learned, were involved in tracking a small Mother's Day anti-war rally organized by families of slain American soldiers.


http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/montereyherald/news/state/13988596.htm?source=rss&channel=montereyherald_state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wexler inquiry into spying on peace groups stifled

Wexler stifled in unveiling spying like that on Lake Worth peace group


By Larry Lipman

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Thursday, March 02, 2006

WASHINGTON — Voting along party lines, a Republican-controlled House committee Wednesday rejected a resolution seeking information from the Bush administration about the Pentagon's spying program on dissident groups.

The House Armed Services Committee's action came on a "resolution of inquiry" filed by Rep. Robert Wexler, a Democrat from Delray Beach, in response to reports that the Pentagon's secret "TALON" program had spied on peace groups including the Truth Project Inc., which sought to counter military recruitment efforts in local high schools.

Snip...

Wexler's resolution would have required the administration to provide the legal authority for the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping activities, as well as the justification and scope of the Pentagon's counterterrorism intelligence program, known as TALON.

Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., argued that Wexler's resolution was not needed because Attorney General Alberto Gonzales gave Congress a 42-page legal brief in December outlining the administration's justification.

In addition, Hunter said, the Defense Department has admitted mistakes with the TALON program.

more...

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/local_news/epaper/2006/03/02/s3b_truth_0302.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC