Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MediaBusters "exposes" Junior's 34% (claim: 409 Dems, 272 Repubs polled)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:05 PM
Original message
MediaBusters "exposes" Junior's 34% (claim: 409 Dems, 272 Repubs polled)


:rofl:

CBS Hypes “All-Time Low” Bush Approval; Skips Rejection of Media's Cheney Obsession
Posted by Brent Baker on February 28, 2006 - 00:10.

http://newsbusters.org/node/4206

Though President Bush's approval rating, in a new CBS News poll released Monday night at 6:30pm EST, was just one point lower than where it stood in October -- and thus well within the poll's three-point margin of error, Bob Schieffer teased the CBS Evening News by declaring: “There is little to celebrate at the White House where public dissatisfaction, that began with the handling of Hurricane Katrina, has driven President Bush's approval ratings to an all-time low" of 34 percent. It stood at 35 percent in CBS's October 2005 survey. In the subsequent story, Jim Axelrod cited public disapproval of the port deal, declining approval for Bush's conduct of the war on terror and how only 37 percent say things in Iraq are going “well,” -- “down nine points” from the fall, but only down one point from 2004. After Axelrod, Schieffer, in New Orleans to mark the six-month anniversary of Katrina, proceeded to recite some Katrina poll numbers. (Transcript follows.)

Left unmentioned: How the poll-takers questioned many more Democrats than Republicans. A PDF posting of poll results lists 409 Democratic respondents versus 272 Republican respondents. CBS “weighted” the results to effectively count 289 Republicans versus 381 Democrats. And while in a couple of minutes of network air time you can hardly be expected to recite every poll finding, CBS managed to skip over several numbers which demonstrated the disconnect between the public and the national press corps. On “media coverage of Cheney hunting accident,” for instance, the public overwhelmingly rejected -- by three-to-one -- the media's obsession: 66 percent said the media devoted “too much time” compared to a piddling 22 percent who thought the press allocated the “right amount of time.” Another nine percent, most likely a lot of journalists and the “angry left,” believed it got “too little time.” Also, by 51 to 47 percent, most “approve of Bush authorizing wiretaps to fight terrorism.”

Those surveyed were spilt 46-46 percent on whether "Cheney's explanation for delay in reporting the accident was" either "satisfactory" or "unsatisfactory." This poll was not conducted, as CBS News polls often are, with the New York Times. A transcript, from the February 27 CBS Evening News, which I created by correcting the closed-captioning against the video of what aired:

From Jackson Square in New Orleans, Bob Schieffer teased: “Good evening, I'm Bob Schieffer in New Orleans where the brave people of this city are managing to celebrate the first Mardi Gras since the hurricane that dealt them such a devastating blow. All this on a day when there is little to celebrate at the White House where public dissatisfaction, that began with the handling of Hurricane Katrina, has driven President Bush's approval ratings to an all-time low.”






:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Poll methodology equalized the results to compensate for the
oversampling. Mediabusters is busted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Neener neener neener It's not true it's just NOT!!!
I see that all of a sudden the poll with 35% approval is being mentioned to rationalize the 34 number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sad, isn't it?
"It's ONLY one point lower, you liberal media BASTARDS!"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The first time a poll said 36%....no mention anywhere in MSM
apparently CBS had one at 35% a while ago and Sheiffert (sp?) mentioned it. Other than that the only mention of polls was done after MSM had waited and waited for a number that was usable. Lest we all forget about his "upturn" to 42% at one point-Lauer and Mathews mentioned THAT just this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Once again the right wing distorts facts to make * appear the victim.
Americans are NOT buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's the real story from MediaMatters.org:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Fortunatly, it is only the RW echo chamber that is trying to minimize...
these results. Our local paper had a good story about *'s fall in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Straight Party Line vote would give those results
Shows America is truly divided along Party Lines. GOP will back Republicans no matter what they have done. There is no critical thinking going on. If Bush* were the Uniter he claims to be results would vary..Just more LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. He dropped similarly in other polls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. it's also because people stop calling themselves Republican
so the number in the sample naturally falls off when the president is unpopular
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. if calls random then valid, probably fewer calling themselves Repub
The data shows that respondents are declaring themselves overwhelming democrat. If the calls were placed randomly according to scientific sampling methods then it's perfectly fine that people are declaring themselves D over R. Now if is shown that the poller was calling known D or R household then that probably isn't valid. Either way a very bad sign for the GOP as fewer and fewer people are willing to declare themselves republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC