Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Senate Approves Changes in Patriot Act Extension

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:23 PM
Original message
U.S. Senate Approves Changes in Patriot Act Extension

U.S. Senate Approves Changes in Patriot Act Extension (Update3)



March 1 (Bloomberg) -- The Senate cleared the way for Congress to renew the USA Patriot Act that gave the FBI expanded power to investigate suspected terrorists after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The Senate voted 95-4 to accept changes to a proposed extension of the law, which has been stalled over objections that it didn't provide enough civil-liberties protections. The House of Representatives will vote next week on the changes. A temporary extension of the law expires March 10.

The revised bill would shield businesses and individuals from having to tell the Federal Bureau of Investigation the names of lawyers they consult about FBI demands for records. Another change would give a company, after a one-year delay, the right to go to court to challenge a gag order that forbids it from discussing the record demands.


Snip...

The proposal ``would permit judicial review of gag orders but under conditions that would make it very difficult for anyone to obtain meaningful judicial review,'' said Feingold, the only senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001. He said it would be ``virtually impossible'' for a company to prove the government acted in bad faith, as required by the bill.


more...


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aEKretSompRE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. This does not make any sense.
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 04:36 PM by Mass
Some people (like Reid and Durbin) who have claimed they would support the bill now do not. Some very liberal senators like Kennedy, Reed, Lautenber, Sarbanes are voting for cloture.

Before I can begin to hail the good senators on this one, can somebody explain to me what this is all about. Except for Feingold, I have trouble understanding what everybody does, except a very political vote without a lot of conviction anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think anyone knows how these things develop.
The way they say one thing and do another the final vote reminds me of people who don't go to Catholic church very often. You can tell because they're usually looking at the people in front of them, trying to decide if they should sit of they should kneel. It's funny when they start to kneel, but they really should be sitting. Then they have to slide their asses on the seat like that's how they normally sit down. Anyway, that's what it looks like to me when these politicians vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe this will help
Seems the part that most objected to was removed (as OP article states):


Aides said the new bill, co-sponsored by the committee's top Democrat, Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, was designed to provide a vehicle for continued debate over the act - how best to protect civil liberties while fighting terrorism. "Everybody in this body wants to reauthorize the Patriot Act. Many of the expiring provisions are entirely noncontroversial," said Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin, who spearheaded opposition to the Sununu bill. "But we also need to fix the provisions that went too far, that do not contain the checks and balances necessary to protect our rights and freedoms."

Sixty votes were needed to end debate, and the motion to do so was passed 69 to 30. Fourteen largely centrist Democrats voted with all of the Senate's 55 Republicans. Thirty Democrats voted against ending debate.

Some Democrats who voted against ending debate - a move known in Senate parlance as cloture - said they did so to protest Republicans' refusal to permit amendments to be added to the legislation, not because they opposed the bill.

"While I will vote against cloture, I nonetheless support the underlying bill . . . ," the Senate Democratic leader, Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, said in a statement. "The Sununu bill puts in place more checks on the expanded authorities granted to the government by the Patriot Act, without interfering with the government's ability to protect Americans from terrorism."

more...

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060301/REPOSITORY/603010362/1013/NEWS03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC