Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone Want A Date With the Devil?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:16 PM
Original message
Anyone Want A Date With the Devil?
I just hate this bitch!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ann Coulter is a cast iron
B*TCH!

But MAN is she hot!!! (sorry, the male pig thing cannot be contained some times)

(that is ann coulter, right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Skinny and EVIL...
.....with PMS and a AK-47!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're right she is a MAN. Sex change operation didn't you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't say things like that
I have wicked fantasies that involve her, duck tape and a copy of the bill of rights to make her cry.

None of that is good for me if she used to be a man. Please say it aint so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OK....THAT got a belly laugh here!!!
GOTTA LOVE a good sense of timing!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. how could you insult our GLBT brothers and sisters with such a nasty
comment? She's an awful nasty skanky witch, but she's no transgender!!!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Really, I apologize in abject shame!
I am fortunate I am not of the Bushido, for Seppuku would be my only recourse. Thank God I'm a country boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. ROFL you are forgiven
:loveya:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And I'll bet you think
she needs to be spanked, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Oh yeah, ahhhhhhhhhhhhh
She's DEFINITELY been bad and is in need of strict disciplining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Shirley, you jest
scrawny, homely, bleach blond with giant implants and an Adam's Apple. That's hot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Whatever she looks like, she's stupid, but have you ever
seen that stupid republican joke about why men are republicans? It shows all these supposedly attractive repub women and then a bunch of known liberal woman. In typical conservative style, instead of leaving well enough alone, they undo their own joke by doctoring up the liberal womean to look ugly. That is, they only prove they had to doctor the photos to make them look ugly.

It is easy to counter with how you could do one why women are Democrats. Al Gore vs. Shrub. Bill Clinton vs. Newt Gringich. JFK vs. Nixon.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't she have a name change along with other changes? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Used to be Stanley Coulter
before the chopocoktomy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. see post 9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You know that for a fact? How? Were you there?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. and you have facts enough to back up a nasty slur on transgendered
people everywhere?

do tell.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MatrixEscape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Hmmm ....
Why witch hunt?

When you compare Bush to Hitler it is about Bush, not Hitler, really. When you compare the wingnuts to fascists, it is about the wingnuts.

Mature adults are able to discern sarcasm from prejudice and diminuative remarks aimed viciously at a certain group.

I fail to see how or why insinuating that Andrew Coulter used to be a man is such a blow to transgendered people, since it is NOT about them at all. I don't hear any references to any person but Coulter, so how does one take personal a general remark that only relates to gender changing rhetorically?

Besides, have you seen the size of Andrew's Adam's Apple? It is rather large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. take a stroll thru the GBLT forum and see what they have to say about it
:shrug:

just saying..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Thank you - some people just don't get it do they? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I "get it" just fine. what I don't get is why people use sexual sterotypes
as insults

get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. You seem obsessed with Ann Coulter - is that healthy?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I could care less about Ann Coulter. I think she is the lowest form of
life.

What I do care about is the amount of posts I've seen from woman, gay and transgenders on this board who are hurt by the thoughtless comments using sexual sterotypes as slurs

Ann Coulter could fall off the planet tomorrow and I probably wouldn't even notice (except for the DU Threads about it, it would be HUGH!!!!!11!!!!!)

but there are plenty of woman, gay and transgender folk who, if they left DU, I would (and have) noticed and missed. All I'm obsessed with is equal treatment for everyone with most especial care of people who are different or out of the mainstream.

OK with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. My question was...........
....not about other people you may or may not like.

The question was what kind of proof you have that Ms. Ann Coulter was not originally Mr Coulter? :shrug:

As for me, I don't know either way but physical appearances really leave room for a bit of doubt. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I answered that, I have as much "proof" as you do. You are using
a logical fallacy here

Includes: Appeal to Ignorance ("Ad Ignorantiam")
Description of Burden of Proof

Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:

1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
2. Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.

In many situations, one side has the burden of proof resting on it. This side is obligated to provide evidence for its position. The claim of the other side, the one that does not bear the burden of proof, is assumed to be true unless proven otherwise. The difficulty in such cases is determining which side, if any, the burden of proof rests on. In many cases, settling this issue can be a matter of significant debate. In some cases the burden of proof is set by the situation. For example, in American law a person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty (hence the burden of proof is on the prosecution). As another example, in debate the burden of proof is placed on the affirmative team. As a final example, in most cases the burden of proof rests on those who claim something exists (such as Bigfoot, psychic powers, universals, and sense data).


Dr. Michael C. Labossiere, the author of a Macintosh tutorial named Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0, has kindly agreed to allow the text of his work to appear on the Nizkor site, as a Nizkor Feature. It remains © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere, with distribution restrictions -- please see our copyright notice. If you have questions or comments about this work, please direct them both to the Nizkor webmasters (webmaster@nizkor.org) and to Dr. Labossiere (ontologist@aol.com).

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. There you go, that is it exactly.
It is not a horrible thing to be transgendered, it is not an insult. My stock answer to people who call me a lesbian because I work on these issues is, SO? I am not but I am most surely not insulted by that.

This kind of thing really disturbs me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. OK, Found this on the subject..
http://journals.aol.com/richardbk8/TheSentryNewsDigest/entries/811

Ann Coulter Is A Man


Foul-Mouthed Blonde Had A Sex Change Operation

The Sentry has it on good authority that in real life Ann Coulter is a man. He/she was once Arthur Coltrane from Pickens County, Georgia, who went to Denmark when he/she was a teenager for a sex-change operation to become a woman, the operation being paid for by his/her wealthy and doting mother, Darlene Coltrane, heiress to a hog-farming fortune.



As Ann appeared more frequently on cable news and magazine shows, it was apparent that she was the only woman on TV with an "Adam's Apple." This led to some poking around in her/his background.

The consensus about "Ms." Coulter/Coltrane is that ONLY a frustrated and unhappy transsexual man could have such a vicious mouth on him/her. People are saying that his/her stunning blond locks are really a wig, which he/she got in a Copenhagen sex-toys and drag-queen supply shop, when his/her own hair fell out after the hormone shots took effect.

Having seen what makeup could do for drag queen Ru Paul, who in real life is a VERY plain-looking black man, everyone finds it not surprising that "Ms." Ann Coulter/Coltrane would have shunned his/her family hog-farming business for the brighter lights of the big city, since we have heard that without all that Danish foundation cream, he/she might easily have been mistaken for one of the livestock.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Either Ann Coulter is a man
or she hit every branch as she was falling out of the ugly tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. and she did this BEFORE she headed out to Cornell at 19? bullshit
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 07:55 PM by AZDemDist6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Maybe she was just confused about what to wear....
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 07:55 PM by NativeTexan
...back then. LMAO

Of course, I just said that she was EVIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. i'll agree, she's a nasty evil skanky horrible insufferable arrogant
heartless attention whore


but i still think she's a woman genetically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. LOL
too funny tex!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. Locking
Flame-bait, with considerable trans-phobic commentary in its wake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC