Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does India really need more Nukes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:09 PM
Original message
Does India really need more Nukes?
Nuclear Pact between U.S., India Draws Fire
by Ron Hutcheson and Jonathan S. Landay


"The bottom line is that this deal would allow India to significantly increase its nuclear weapons arsenal and provides precious little safeguarding," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association. "This is a nonproliferation nothing-burger, and Congress will see it as that if they look carefully."


But Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently said Pakistan couldn't expect the same treatment. "Pakistan is not in the same place as India," she said.

India has an estimated 50 to 60 nuclear warheads, according to a September report by the Natural Resources Defense Council, a U.S. arms-control group.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0303-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
India will definitely be the next superpower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's so hard to understand about an arms buildup by proxy
where you can sell advanced technology, tanks, fighters, detection equipment, bunkers, bunker-busters, bunker-buster-proof-bunkers, and so on and so on and if both countries go to shit you get all those outsourced jobs back.

??

Seems pretty simple to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. In my view this will only spur other nations to obtain...
nukes and make Pakistanis more angry than they already are. The most dangerous nation is not N. Korea or Iran, it is Pakistan. Think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. oops
forgot the :sarcasm: rider
didn't think I'd need it with a statement like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps they're following our model... more is better...
More is just always better--more everything or anything, in every way, in all cases... right? Not, but it does seem to reflect something about our own culture.

And when it comes to P O W E R, unless you can destroy the known world a dozen times over, you're still pretty puny? eh? Of course, George (and us by association) is the only one allowed to have that kind of power. Though, truly, the fewer countries that have such power and the smaller that power is, the safer we'll all be (for the more there are, the greater the chance that they will be used or will be stolen by those who will use them or... any other complication--all the more likely). Of course, too, since we have a fair sized pile of the things, not many countries who have or are seeking a few of their own are going to listen to us when we tell them they shouldn't want more and/or cannot have more (or any).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC