Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State druggists want right to say "no" to certain medications (WA State)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:51 PM
Original message
State druggists want right to say "no" to certain medications (WA State)
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002858143_pharmacy11m.html

A proposal would allow druggists to refuse to dispense medications because of personal beliefs.

(snip)

At the heart of the debate is a proposal put forward by the pharmacy association, a private trade group, that would allow pharmacists to act as "conscientious objectors" when faced with filling prescriptions that go against their moral or religious principles and require them to provide patients with other "options."

Gov. Christine Gregoire sent a letter opposing the proposal to the Pharmacy Board.

"This issue goes far beyond women's access to contraception, but appeals to the right of all patients to have their prescription filled without judgment or discrimination," wrote Gregoire.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I look at it this way
When we had the draft, men had the right to conscientious objector status, because theoretically every male was "called up". But now that we have an all volunteer military, there's no need for a conscientious objector status. The last I heard, everyone wasn't "drafted" into becoming a phramacist. If someone has a problem dispensing drugs, they shouldn't be in the profession. I doubt if there are any Christian Scientists who are pharmacists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And I look at it this way...the day they refuse Viagra or Cialis or
condoms for men, is the day I'll believe this is not discrimination aimed squarely at women in this society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. To all those pharms...
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 09:16 PM by XanaDUer
AGAIN-You have NO RIGHTS at work. You are a mere cog in the wheels of America's businesses...shut the fuck up and work and do what you are told.

Also-no one made you a pharmacist. You should have known all about things like rubbers and the pill , etc., before you went into the pill trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I was struck by the last line of the article
it was a 23 year old student at UW who said she should not have to leave her morals at home. She is making the choice to be a pharmacist. Perhaps she should head to admissions office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do we need pharmacists to dispense them?
Get rid of the "legal need" for prescriptions for non-addictive medicines, problem solved. Pharmacists can still stock the shelves....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And there are robotic pharms, too
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 09:20 PM by XanaDUer
The McKesson robot is one-dispenses meds with nary a question about them and no moralizing...as a good pharmacist should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pre-Roe vs Wade doctors often rejected patients for religious
reasons. Catholic doctors did not help women or men with birth control devices. We knew it and went to non-catholic docs. However when Wal-Mart is the only game in town where else is a woman supposed to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does this apply for all professions?

For example...can a vegetarian grocery store employee refuse to sell someone meat? After all, they are only following their beliefs.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. anybody who has a "moral objection" to dispensing certain drugs needs
to be in another profession, PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC