Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wellstone $817,247 PAC money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:52 AM
Original message
Wellstone $817,247 PAC money
One race. 2002. The Center for Public Integrity apparently has no integrity. They're the ones releasing this 15 year lobbying report. They divide money as PAC's or lobbyists. Emily's List is a lobbyist, for example. Is Wellstone a crook? He took more money in one campaign than Kerry did in his entire life from "special interests". We're not getting the whole story, which isn't surprising of course.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/memberprofile.asp?CID=N00004443&Cycle=2002

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Emily's List a lobbyist? Ridiculous.
It exists to get pro-choice women into office. Given the gross underrepresentation of women in the Congress, that is a public service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's A Lobby You Agree With
If it were anti-abortion or pro-gun, you might not be so quick to judge what is a public service.

Personally, I agree with you, but that doesn't make Emily's List somehow less of a lobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's their rules
Not mine. The facts are being misrepresented, hugely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's the Center for Responsive Politics
not the Center for Public Integrity.

They do designate Emily's List as a PAC:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strID=C00193433

They're not listed on sandnsea's Wellstone PAC donor page because they didn't contribute to him during the 2002 campaign cycle:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.asp?strID=C00193433&Cycle=2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. EL only contributes to women candidates
EMILY's list is a PAC. That's not the same as lobbying.

They raise money for the campaigns of pro-choice Democratic women. They also coordinate GOTV efforts and train budding legislators. They are the largest grassroots political network in the nation, and the largest PAC after the two major parties. They have money and the use it, but not for lobbying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Of Course, Emily's list employs lobbyists!
Do you think that US Reps and Senators just sort of keep up with all organizations and decide to support them based on good intentions? Lobbyists represent both biz and good works orgs.

If you watch The West Wing, you'll know that the Mary Louise parker character was a powerful women's issues lobbyist before accepting a White House job.

In The American president, the female lead is an environmental lobbyist.

Yeah, John Kerry took $1000 from The Sierra Club and then voted for environmentally friendly legislation.
And that was horrible because...?

Neither Kerry nor Wellstone ever accepted Enron/Halliburton $ and then voted in their favor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes. Unfortunately Dean wasn't HONEST when he said Kerry was "on the take"
from special interest lobbyists who made INDIVIDUAL donations to Kerry.

The figures were lumped together from a 19 year period.

Desperate Dean camp is spinning this story into a major scandal based on a FALSE perception that he is actively promoting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Wrong. I'm here to stop Dean from taking the party down with him.
Kerry has advocated for public financing of campaigns since 1985. He'll use the bully pulpit of the presidency to push it through.

Dean is a liar, not a reformer as he claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I was a lobbyist.
It is not an evil word although Republicans would have you believe it is.

I lobbied for cure research for type 1 diabetes in the NIH budget. I don't think I was evil and I never made a dime doing it. But I was still a lobbyist.

There are PACS (which are registered as such) that do wonderful things like get environmental legislation passed, patient education bills approved, dangerous products recalled.

Why does everyone here act like every PAC or lobbyist is evil incarnate??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting
......kick for the purists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. He was gettin' a lot a "sugar"
From the sugar industry, wasn't he? And I despise them.

I loved Wellstone, still do. But, folks, there ain't no virgins in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Star Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wellstone
isn't anything.

He was one of the best senators this country has ever had, however.

Thanks for the attempted smear. If you look at who donated to him, it doesn't wash. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Same with Kerry
thanks for the perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. This might be noteworty if Wellstone claimed he never took money
from PAC's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. The whole Dean ploy is ridiculous. Look at peoples records of voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edge Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. What's with this smear of the best political leader...
this country has ever had? Never once have I seen a man like Wellstone in politics. He was the only person who actually cared about me, the little person. And now, after 15 months of his death, I see people dishonoring him. This is sad.

And look at the people who did give him money. They were from organizations and PACs who help us, not the ones who help the rich (Halliburton, etc.).

I think we need to learn a little abour respect around here when it comes to Paul Wellstone. I'm still very saddened over his death. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I think the point is to show respect for Kerry. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yikes ! Digging up the corpse of Wellstone to defend Kerry :-( -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes. But Wellstone isn't running against Dean. If he were, Dean
would claim to still be the only anti-war candidate and would attack Wellstone in every way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. No because Kerry is lying
and Wellstone isn't. It isn't Dean's fault your candidate is a liar when it comes to the war. If he tried being honest it would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. The formulation is a sham.
Where are Dean's full career of donations?

Where are the records of his donors that he protected by sealing his records? Where are the utilty execs he serviced and then sealed the records and THEN accepted money for his personal pac?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. I would think this should set this matter to rest
but I'm probably wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC