Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi calls Moscow to discuss "firm, meaningful action" on Iran nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:59 AM
Original message
Condi calls Moscow to discuss "firm, meaningful action" on Iran nukes
Rice's Warning Call To Moscow
The Secretary of State does some long distance Iran diplomacy from the road
By ELAINE SHANNON

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1173686,00.html?cnn=yes

Posted Thursday, Mar. 16, 2006



As UN Security Council members in New York continued to try to hash out an agreement on how best to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice added her own personal touch to the diplomatic wrangling half a world away. Rice interrupted her travels Wednesday morning through Indonesia and Australia to place a call to her Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in Moscow. A State Department official says they discussed how best to take "firm, meaningful action" to rein in Iran, which insists it has the right to enrich uranium for what it says are peaceful purposes. But another knowledgeable US official goes further, asserting that Rice called Lavrov to voice concern about his government’s continued opposition to a joint US-European plan to have the Security Council call on Iran to suspend its nuclear activities. The official said that Rice warned Lavrov that Russia was becoming isolated from the rest of the Security Council; she referred, he says, to Tuesday's "informal" gathering of Security Council delegates hosted by the French UN mission. During that session, the official says, 13 of 15 representatives expressed agreement with a French-British draft proposal to have the Securitiy Council issue a statement giving Iran two weeks to comply with the demands of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the watchdog organization that works to prevent nuclear proliferation.

The two holdouts, not surprisingly, have been Russia and China. While officials from the two nations have agreed in principle that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and expressed some frustration with Iran's intransigence, they have both been reluctant to act too forcefully or quickly against Tehran. According to US officials, since last Friday, in a series of meetings in New York among the veto-wielding "permanent five" members of the Security Council—the US, Great Britain, France, Russia and China—the Russians have pushed for changes in the French-British draft that, one US official complains, "designed to gut the proposed statement." In particular, one source says, Russia is opposing setting a short deadline for Iran’s compliance and is trying to move the issue out of Security Council and back to the less potent IAEA board.

"They’re afraid that a tough measure (will provoke) Iran into an irrational reaction" that would spur the West to demand global economic sanctions," says the US official. The Russians, he says, "are not ready for sanctions. They want to buy time, stretch the process out." But no one is making it easy on them. In addition to Rice's entreaty, US Ambassasdor to Russia William Burns paid a call Tuesday on Lavrov, and, according to the Interfax News Agency, French foreign minister Philippe Douste-Blazy also telephoned him.

The US and its Western European allies aren’t ready to discuss economic sanctions. But officials say some diplomats have begun talking quietly to one another and to other countries about where they might squeeze their commercial relations with Iran to force the Islamist regime to suspend its research on uranium enrichment and other techologies essential to constructing a bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Voted Secretary of State Most in Need of a Makeover.
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:10 PM by Dunvegan
Enough with the shoes all ready, Condi...hie thee to a makeup artist!

(Adults do orthodonture these days, too, ya know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. firm and meaningful...not like anything specific or historical (PDB)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC