Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain is lying two-faced hypocrite (hampering lobby reform)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 07:14 PM
Original message
McCain is lying two-faced hypocrite (hampering lobby reform)
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 07:17 PM by ProSense
Campaign reformer my a**

RULES OF THE GAME


Sputtering Out
By Eliza Newlin Carney, NationalJournal.com
© National Journal Group Inc.
Monday, March 20, 2006

The outlook for meaningful lobbying reform in this Congress has gone from bad to worse.

Senate floor consideration of lobbying and ethics changes, derailed by an unrelated dispute over U.S. port security, is on hold indefinitely. GOP leaders have finally unveiled a sketchy plan in the House, but they remain deeply divided over specifics. And in both chambers, Republicans are pushing tough, new limits on so-called 527 groups -- a poison pill that Democrats will never swallow.


Snip...

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., quietly submitted an amendment to the lobbying reform bill on the Senate floor March 9 that would cap donations to 527 groups at $25,000 annually, or $50,000 per election cycle. (Such groups now disclose their receipts and expenditures to the IRS, but face no contribution limits.)

McCain's move was a surprise, given that several senators had explicitly agreed to keep controversial 527 provisions out of the lobbying debate. Rules and Administration Committee Chairman Trent Lott, R-Miss., strongly endorses new 527 rules. Nevertheless, when the Senate first took up lobby reform legislation on March 6, Lott went out of his way to stress that campaign finance changes would not be on the table.


Snip...

So why did McCain suddenly slip a 527 amendment into the lobbying legislation on March 9? McCain's press office did not return calls seeking comment. McCain's amendment was introduced immediately after Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to force a vote on U.S. port safety. Was McCain sending a signal that Republicans can play rough, too?

more...

http://nationaljournal.com/carney.htm




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you get the idea that the current goal of all involved is
utter anarchy?

IMO, this is all designed to keep constituents happy by making it look as if you're doing something when you are really doing nothing but lobbing the ball back and forth, back and forth, back and forth... Hey, maybe it's hypnotizing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just what is the love affair around here with McCain???
I just don't get it.

He's a freaking ass hat that plays to both sides whenever it is convenient for him. One minute he loves bush, then he hates bush. He plays to the media, he screws the media.

The only person John McCain cares about and loves is ...............................himself.

What is so hard to figure out about the guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "John McCain, Hypocrite"
John McCain, Hypocrite
by Doug Ireland

John McCain, the media's darling, has found a clever way around his own campaign finance reform law to take big corporate bucks in furtherance of his political ambitions while carrying water for the corporate mammoth providing the dough. But the national press is ignoring the story.


The Associated Press first ran the story of John McCain's odorous but lucrative Senatorial service to the communications giant Cablevision on the afternoon of March 7. But, while some local papers in McCain's home state (like the East Valley Tribune) have run the story, nothing has as yet made it into the print editions of the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, or any of the half-dozen other big city dailies I checked (although, if one searches the hundreds of AP stories available on the Post's website on its Politics page by clicking on "Latest Wire Reports," one can find it there--but how many readers would bother to do that?) One notable exception: the Kansas City Star.


Here's what the AP's investigation found:


McCain repeatedly intervened on behalf of a policy Cablevision favored -- one which "congressional and private studies conclude could make cable more expensive" -- while his chief political adviser, Rick Davis (who's masterminding McCain's probable '08 presidential rerun) solicited $200,000 in contributions from Cablevision to an institute that promotes McCain and pays Davis a $110,000 annual salary.


The Reform Institute was set up to promote McCain and his issues--especially campaign finance reform, embodied in the famous McCain-Feingold law. This Institute is "a tax-exempt group that touts McCain's views and has showcased him at events since his unsuccessful 2000 presidential campaign," and it "often uses the senator's name in press releases and fund-raising letters and includes him at press conferences," the AP says. And, of course, it provides a cushy sinecure with no heavy lifting for McCain's main man, Davis, as he prepares the pontificating Senator's next presidential run. Cablevision's contributions account for a whopping 15% of the Institute's budget.


http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0309-35.htm

McCain hypocrisy:

The Bushification of John McCain

By Ari Melber, AlterNet. Posted November 15, 2005.

The bad blood between the two men has been infamous since 2000, when Bush's campaign lied about McCain's family and war service, and McCain told Bush to "get out of the gutter."

But during Bush's reelection in 2004, McCain strained to embrace his former rival -- literally. In their first joint appearance, they hugged dramatically before 6,000 soldiers at a Fort Lewis rally. Those events made for great campaign visuals. Yet while most Americans saw McCain's big heart, Republican leaders saw hungry ambition.

Rich Lowry, editor of the conservative magazine National Review, recently described that campaign bear hug as nothing but proof of "the senator's presidential ambitions." Lowry argues it's just part of McCain's scheme to get "the Right to stop loathing him." In targeted moves since the election, McCain has continued his Bushification by changing positions on conservative priorities like creationism, gay marriage and tax cuts.

As the costs of Hurricane Katrina mounted, McCain went on national television and told Chris Mathews the Bush tax cuts must be maintained. But McCain voted against those tax cuts.

In fact, he was one of only two Republicans to oppose Bush's signature 2001 tax cut. Given the surging costs of Katrina, Iraq and Medicare, there is no policy rationale for reversing his position now. The only rationale is political pandering. And that's exactly how some influential conservatives see it. Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, recently said that although McCain has "flip-flopped on a number of issues," he is still "anti-taxpayer" because "he's voted against every tax cut."

Yet the mainstream media is so attached to McCain's maverick image, most journalists didn't cover the tax reversal.


http://www.alternet.org/story/28266 /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC