Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Analysis: Bush Loves Using "Straw Men" To Knock "Nonexistent" Opponents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:07 PM
Original message
AP Analysis: Bush Loves Using "Straw Men" To Knock "Nonexistent" Opponents
The Associated Press on Saturday provided an astute analysis of the way President Bush rhetorically argues.

The AP's conclusion should be no surprise to JABBS readers. Bush creates fictional "straw men" -- creating the impression that a minority or fringe opinion reflects the views of all of his critics -- that can be easily knocked down.

Some examples:

-- "Some look at the challenges in Iraq and conclude that the war is lost and not worth another dime or another day."

-- "Some say that if you're Muslim you can't be free."

-- "There are some really decent people who believe that the federal government ought to be the decider of health care ... for all people."

"The device usually is code for Democrats or other White House opponents," according to the March 18 analysis. "In describing what they advocate, Bush often omits an important nuance or substitutes an extreme stance that bears little resemblance to their actual position. ... Because the 'some' often go unnamed, Bush can argue that his statements are true in an era of blogs and talk radio."

Even so, "'some' suggests a number much larger than is actually out there," Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, told the AP.

A specialist in presidential rhetoric, Wayne Fields of Washington University in St. Louis, views the rhetorical device as "a bizarre kind of double talk" that abuses the rules of legitimate discussion.

"<strong>It's such a phenomenal hole in the national debate that you can have arguments with nonexistent people</strong>," Fields told the AP. "What's striking here is how much this administration rests on a foundation of this kind of stuff."

Straw men have made more frequent appearances in recent months, often on national security — once Bush's strong suit with the public but at the center of some of his difficulties today. Under fire for a domestic eavesdropping program, a ports-management deal and the rising violence in Iraq, Bush now sees his approval ratings hovering around the lowest of his presidency.

Said Jamieson, "You would expect people to do that as they feel more threatened."

***

This item first appeared at JABBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow someone in the AP criticizing Bush?
This is good stuff. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. SOME insist on supporting a failed President
Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 02:24 PM by melissinha
who feels he can pick and chose which laws he is going to follow.

SOME feel that the environment, the poor, the middle class, the economy, port security can balanced against the needs of corporations despite the laws that exist to protect these very things.

SOME feel that Christians should support a President who truly does not follow the example of Christ.

SOME support a reckless war of aggression in spite of worldwide apprehension.


AND
SOME think its appropriate to create straw men to distract from one's own political failings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some say Bush is a smart and competent leader
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. He did it with Helen Thomas's question...
When she asked him why he started the war with Iraq, he went off on a tangent about 'no president "wants" war' and proceeded to create a response that was totally unrelated to her question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC