Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget "abortion." Immigration is the new wedge issue that the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:52 AM
Original message
Forget "abortion." Immigration is the new wedge issue that the
Rethugs are going to use through 2008 and the deck is stacked for them to win because they will appear to be on the side the American worker by being against amnesty. If the Dems can't re-frame the issue to their advantage forget Dems in government until 2012...and then it won't matter because it will all be over according to the Mayan calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. IMHO for once I think the Dems should side with BUSH on this
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 12:14 PM by wakeme2008
and go with the guest worker program....

that one program will spilt the Repug party.... IMHO we should NOT have a third option.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. There is NO such thing as an illegal Human Being
I am disgusted by the posturing of both the republicans and democrats on this issue. The fact is most americans WILL NOT engage in the type of employment these women and men from south america do. I know plenty of companies that advertise labor intensive construction jobs that start you out at the menial level that I used to do while in college.
However nobody BORN here wants to dig holes or trenches. So you can advertise in the paper, hold job fairs in the city and no one shows up for work but Jose and his newly arrived buddy. Companies I have done subcontract work for, pay between 10 and 15 dollars for this type of work. Perfect for a high school student, or a strong young person. Not even the children of these immigrants want to do this work. So what do you propose we do? These people are just looking to improve their lot in life. Give me a break....let them in, any more talk of border fences and this will be a police state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're right. And isn't it interesting that all of this smoke about
immigration is on the horizon now???? How convenient! Keeping our eye off the incompetence and corruption in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure they can. They can reframe it in terms of WAGES
and how the Repugs always want to bring in lots of immigrants to HOLD WAGES DOWN.

87% if people in a recent Zogby survey said wages need to rise. Framing this as another attempt by the fat cats to bring in "guest workers" to hold the wages of American citizens down is where the wedge is.

Any Democrat who doesn't campaign on wages is a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bush knows this so he frames these jobs as "Onion Pluckers" (blatant lie)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guidod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I disagree,
There is a very large Latino population in this Country who are in favor of Amnesty, especially in Texas, Arizona and California. Those three states carry a lot of strength when it comes to immigration, and also have a lot of elector college votes. Here in Los Angeles there is supposed to be a march of about 250,000 people in favor of looser immigration laws. I don't think it will be that easy for the repugs to form any type of platform.

I also will never give up on helping women in having the freedom of choice. Remember, it's not about abortion it's about choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Framing the issue is going to be a struggle for Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. And as per usual...
...the Democratic party is not smart enough, or committed enough to its base, to figure out how to wedge it right back in the Republicans' faces.

It's unethical business owners and agribusiness who hire illegals to work for them so they can increase their margins. So let's crack down on that side of it. Let's crack down on those who hire immigrants, put the burden on them to prove that the people they hire are here working legally; let's make sure the jobs are available to citizens as well as non-citizens; and let's make sure that everyone is paid legal minimum wage.

And before you get all bent out of shape re: immigrant bashing, that is not my goal here. My goal is merely to point out that if you see a wedge issue coming, you've got to sharpen and drive your own wedge.

This cannot be framed as an issue where the lowest paid workers are getting shafted by even lower paid, more desperate workers -- that frame wins for Republicans, who pit worker against worker. Rather, frame it as honest, above board, responsible business people being shafted by cutthroat, underhanded operators who exploit vulnerable workers and undercut businesses that operate by the rules; in the process the honest business people are being driven out of business and wages for everyone are driven down.

Okay I'm not a political strategist -- maybe there is a better take on this. But somehow I just know that there could be a frame that works to our advantage here. Unfortunately the DLC is so beholden to the corporations that they will generally toe the line and refuse to step on the toes of corporate interests. Fortunately, there is a huge largely untapped alternative funding source, as shown by Moveon.org and Howard Dean and the DNC: the Internet and its ability to reach individuals who will put their money where their mouth is.

We need to harness it and we need to frame these issues NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. oh, please, cut the defeatism
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 02:28 PM by Lexingtonian
Republicans are split 40/60, very much on moderate vs conservative lines, on this hardcore approach to immigration and 'illegals'. Democrats are split 20/80, conservatives vs moderates and liberals. Since conservative Democrats don't vote Democratic in federal elections, national Democrats in effect lose no votes by being against this bill. They lose their voters by not siding against it.

So the split that actually affects votes is moderate Republicans against hardline Republicans. Immigration is in fact a Republican wedge issue- the rich and relatively tolerant money-centered suburban moderates vs. the desperate, angry, poor/impoverishing blue collar ones.

On banning abortion a la South Dakota, the Pew poll says selfidentifying Democrats are against it 65/30, Indies are against it 65/30, moderate Republicans are against it 65/30. Hardline conservative Republicans are the other way, 65% in favor of banning. and 30% against.

So in abortion, there is a 65/30 national consensus of sorts around the status quo (i.e. serious personal difficulty obtaining abortions and great social pressure to use contraceptives) for about 2/3 or 3/4 of the electorate, and- if you've been following the pollings- hardening and widening of this consensus during this past year. Among this large portion of the electorate I have, after years of following the matter, come to the conclusion that the championing of a ban by those 30% of it is a front more than a design or commitment. The real outlier bloc in the issue is the hardline conservative Republicans, who really mean to implement a ban and have little interest in the real consequences- it's all about trying to recreate an idealized way of life of the Past for them.

I believe abortion is also now evolving into an issue where the wedge of political consequence is now, or shortly will fully be, between moderate and conservative Republicans. I'm going to be watching what they do as the federal lawsuit against the SD law goes through the courts very closely. I think the outcome will surprise people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC