Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times Takes Sen. Roberts to task for Phase II failure.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:56 AM
Original message
NY Times Takes Sen. Roberts to task for Phase II failure.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/07/opinion/07fri1.html

Playing Hardball With Secrets

Published: April 7, 2006

For more than two years, Senate Republicans have dragged out an investigation into how the Bush administration came to use bogus intelligence on Iraq to justify a war. A year ago, Pat Roberts, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called it "a monumental waste of time" to consider whether the White House manipulated intelligence to exaggerate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein.

Meanwhile, the evidence has steadily mounted that President Bush and his team not only did that before the war, but kept right on doing it after the invasion. The most recent additions to this pile came yesterday, in reports by The New York Sun, The National Journal and other news organizations on documents from the case against Lewis Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Cheney who is charged with lying about the unmasking of Valerie Wilson, a covert C.I.A. agent.

According to these papers, Mr. Libby testified that President Bush authorized him to tell reporters about classified intelligence on Iraq as part of an effort to discredit Mrs. Wilson's husband, Joseph Wilson, a retired diplomat who had cast doubt on the claim that Iraq tried to acquire uranium for nuclear bombs from Niger. The National Journal reported that Mr. Libby has also said that Mr. Cheney authorized him to leak classified information before the invasion to make the case for war.

...We have seen no evidence that Mr. Bush authorized the outing of Mrs. Wilson. But at the least, revealing selected bits of intelligence, including information that officials may well have known to be false, seems like a serious abuse of power. It's not even clear that Mr. Bush can legally declassify intelligence at whim.


Sen. Roberts has said that his committee looked into the use of intelligence by this administration. He is and his committee is charged with just that task, monitoring the executive branch, to ensure that the lives of our children are not thrown away in mindless political or geopolitical games. He pooh-poohed any mention of a more thorough 'Phase II' investigation, saying it had already occurred and that its findings are almost ready for publication. Yet this man, privy to the most sensitive intelligence, does not and did not say that Bush enabled the release of administration-friendly information and withheld that which strengthened the claims of their adversaries. He must have known it to be true but he appears to have actively concealed the fact from America.

It is axiomatic here that the entire GOP is complicit in facilitating the mess in which we find ourselves. All of them. Let us not be distracted by folk who mention the 'tone' of any political discussion, not when so many have died and have given so much blood. I don't want to hear how the president wants a 'dignified' conversation about Iraq, how he doesn't want to hear about 'misleading America into war'.

I really believe that Sen. Roberts is an excellent example of what the GOP, all of them, are doing and have done to this country. All I know is that in every race all over the country the GOP must be held accountable for creating this poisonous atmosphere. Sen. Roberts is clearly responsible because when he had the chance, he failed to clear the poison away. He should be an emblem of what could have been known but wasn't.

I don't really mean all of them. There must be some who honestly care about America. I remember a republican who was in charge of the department of Veteran's Affairs. He was canned because of his active advocacy for the veterans he represented. He was replaced by a party hack. Most members of the GOP, however, care primarily for the corporate interests of their contributors. They must be vilified with broad brushes. Their tales of failure, greed, corruption, mismanagement and enslavement to their corporate interests must be harvested as if they were crops for which we cared all spring and summer. Sen. Roberts is just low-hanging and ripe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nom! It's about time this was laid out and blame assigned. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This should be a no-brainer! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Really, if the NYT had done its job in the first place maybe
they wouldn't have to print these periodical tongue (print) lashings at the bush* admin. Hell, they had one of the biggest liars working for them. And so it has been said the CEO of the rag was in cahoots with these guys as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too bad more people in Kansas don't read the NY Times....
They might get rid of Rubberstamp Roberts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He might be of more use as an 'in-place' poster boy.
Sen. Roberts is such an excellent example of GOP failure and GOP enabling behavior that he almost has to used as one. The entire GOP must be tarred with the 'enabler' brush. If they didn't actually commit the crimes the certainly abetted them. The GOP: the party of criminals, abettors and enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Sen. Roberts has said that his committee looked
into the use of intelligence by this administration."

Hearing Testimony:
SEN ROBERTS: Did you or anyone in the administration manipulate intelligence to exaggerate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein?

ANS: No, Sir.

SEN ROBERTS: Thank you. This concludes the proceedings. We are adjourned. *bangs gavel*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Pretty good summary of the probable testimony. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The kicker is it was a classified hearing!
*wink*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. SHUT.IT.DOWN.
No phase 2? Shut down the government, the country. NOW

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harlinchi Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Something needs to be done.
There are too many areas where the issue of the administration's use of intelligence arises. That the issue has never been effectively investigated is a manifestation of the GOP's enabling attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sorry, just a question. If we wait until the elections, do we stand...
a better chance of having a more thorough investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Uh-oh...the 'messenger' better beef up it's body armor
Especially in an election year, the Cons (through Beohner and Frist's *cough* leadership *cough*) are going to raise that traitorous liberal media meme to deafening levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Robert's job for this administration is to ensure that investigation is
obscured and obstructed at every turn. He uses bizarre logic just like the rest of them and it works. He made sure 9-11 was never investigated and he made sure this crime was never investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Morally corrupt Kansas republicans know how to shut down
serious investigations. Bob Dole was the leader in the senate and got immunity for the Reagan administration witnesses in Iran Contra thereby subverting Justice & the Truth. Roberts is in the same mold (pun intended). Blech!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. And where is the rest of the Corporate Media - Roberts needs to be
exposed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC