A question for President Bush

<snip>

It is: Did the president tell the special prosecutor's team all the truth that he knew, or did he tell them the same thing he was telling us back then?

We need to know that because what Bush was telling us in 2003 _ that he knew nothing about the leaks and wanted to find and fire all leakers _ ran the narrow gamut from misleading half-truth to bald-faced untruth.

Of course, it is not a federal crime for a president to lie to the American people when he is not under oath. (No, the usual punishment we inflict upon incumbent presidents who lie to us is to re-elect them.)

But it is a crime for anyone to mislead, impede or lie to federal investigators _ whether they are not under oath to tell the truth or not. For a president or a vice president, it can be an impeachable crime. (This point was argued most persuasively by congressional Republicans a few years ago as they made a federal case out of an incident that was not about national security, but consensual oral sex.)

<snip>

http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=SCHRAM-04-11-06

is a madman.
He is out to complete his own agenda
Facts dont matter to him
Just want what he wants
Hence all this so call classified info and twisting of facts.

What is very clear is that all his action is intentional.
Facts was known but totally ignore or kept secret.
What lying got to do with it?
This worst then lying

And gee a got 10,000 nukes to play with.
Oh well, what will be will be
Nothing anyone can do at moment outside US
We dont want the smoking gun to become a mushroom cloud
But hell be let loose if the mushroom cloud do occurred
Either US conquer the world or be destroyed.

Even then :rofl:
Do Americans ever learn from Veitnam and Iraq
You can conquered the world but American will be dying like flies all over trying to keep occupied country from revolting.
Haha dumb dumb thinking NO ONE WIN IN WAR cause when it start all hell break loose for a long long time.