Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liberal vs. Conservative.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 11:28 AM
Original message
Liberal vs. Conservative.
Although I know, as does everyone, that the "liberal" and "conservative" labels do carry weight in any political argument.

But as I see it, the reason we don't have a parliamentary system, is that we are, primarily, a two party political animal. My point is that there are so many levels of "liberal", as well as "conservative", with both parties.

If this were not the case, then we would have a Liberal Party and a Conservative Party.

When, within our party, we attack "conservatives" or "liberals" or "moderates" as being anti-Democratic, we weaken the foundation of a party with a long standing "big-tent" inclusionary stance toward its members. We argue amongst ourselves, always have, and hopefully always will. Between the different levels of liberalism and conservatism, we find a stance that is good for AMERICA, not the Democrats, and certainly not the Republicans. Republicans do NOT argue, as a rule, and concern themselves only with power and financial gain into the pockets of their primary supporters...big business. They don't even have a serious concern about the religious right. They only manipulate them by taking their side in public, getting their financial and election day support, and then do some half-baked effort on the hill to try to make them think "we tried, whew and we are tired, let's take a break".

Democrats have ALWAYS been the party of the little guy, as my sainted father used to tell me. And all "little guys" are not liberals. Nor are they all conservatives or moderates. They run the gambit just like the rest of the party.

I see nothing wrong with debating amongst ourselves, but namecalling and viciousness is the hallmark of the Great Ole Pedophiles Party, not the great institution of the Democratic National Party, the party of JFK, LBJ, FDR, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton. And look at the range of philosophies you see in that list!

I do not belong to an organized political party....I am a DEMOCRAT!!

But then again....thats just me.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice post - and I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well put, and I emphatically agree that
for the most part Democrat politicians have taken the wrong turn and lost some level of our support where they have tried to emulate Repuglicans. I am specifically talking about them cozying up to big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I couldn't have said it better myself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and nominated!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. I just wanted to make the point...
...that we are all in this together, and the party has a rich and wonderful legacy of coming together out of fights...nasty fights...but not party damaging fights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breakfastofchampions Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I will represent myself with a philosophy
Parties can change, philosophies don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And parties do go thru changes, no doubt.
But the Democratic Party has always been the only party that looked out for the little guy....the poor...the middle-class...the working man and woman.

And being inclusive, as it has always been, allows for many different philosophies to come together to creat policies that have the intention of helping, when enacted, to form "a more perfect union", something which the Good Ole Pedophiles have never cared about...unless more perfect means the rich get richer and the poor get poorer by making the rich richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC