Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it **what** they did? . . . . . or **that** they did it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:30 PM
Original message
Is it **what** they did? . . . . . or **that** they did it?
Is your concern over the NSA crap based on ...... what, exactly?

On the one hand we have *what* they did. They spied on American citizens on American soil doing what every American does for no better reason than they could.

On the other hand, we have the simple fact that they actually *did* it. It is clearly illegal. It is cleary unprecedented and unwarranted. And they just .... **did** it.

For the sake of this discussion, try to separate these two sides of the same coin. What bothers you more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think they can be separated
Edited on Thu May-11-06 07:35 PM by Juniperx
If "what" they did wasn't so horrific, the fact that they "did" it would be moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. What bothers me is we no longer are a nation of laws
The law is a joke. It is so bad, a Congresswoman is actually introducing a law that the President must obey the law!

The USA is DOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. introducing a law that the President must obey the law
I'm so furious. Are they trying to drive us all ape shit wacko? How much more of this lawless stupidity can the human mind tolerate? The President of the US is supposed to be the keeper of the laws. We are supposed to be looking to this idiot for guidance and that secure, cared for feeling. He is supposed to be our leader. Oh, GOD! I can't believe this is happening! Somebody pinch me! Surely this is a nightmare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yup. Jane Harman
Consider it a slap across his smirky face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Doesn't matter--Bush will attach a signing statement
saying that he is not obligated to obey the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. he needs to check the oath he took...
...when he became Prez!!

He is definitely required to uphold the law!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He doesn't think so
and what he believes is all that matters to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. it doesn't really matter what he thinks..........
...he took the oath! And by taking the oath, he certainly agreed to uphold the laws!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. What did the world's most sought after (so say) terrorist mean when
he referred to the "criminals in Washington".??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's another thing that drives me mad!
Those freaks of nature in the administration are putting us in the position where we are agreeing with terrorists! And then they hold it against us! Sometimes the bad guys speak the truth. What is it the Bible says about how the Devil mixes lies with truth to keep us confused?

If I had one wish, I'd wish that tomorrow morning, everyone in the world would wake up wearing cowboy hats that cannot be removed. Black for the bad guys and white for the good guys. There's just no other way to tell them apart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Perceptive and correct ........
the administration are putting us in the position where we are agreeing with terrorists!

I'll go ya one better ...... **if** what they say the actually did is true (BIIIIIG 'IF') and **if** they did with the data what they say the did with the data, and **if** they went o the FISA Court for permission, I don't really have a huge problem with it. Its bothersome, to be sure, but maybe not an outrage. A pattern-match search could well turn up a lead or three to what might be in the planning stages.

But the fact that they just went and did it - with their patented 'fuck you America' attitude ... that just puts me so far over the top I start to spit and sputter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. that is a BIG 'if'!!
The real problem is.......after all that we have seen from this admin, who (at this point) trusts them to do what they say they're doing?

I mean they have told so many HUGE lies, does anyone really trust them anymore? I know I don't!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's that they did it....
...There's nothing incriminating in my phone records that I know of and I'm sure that applies to all my friends and relatives.So what they did is "merely" an outrage....But what put this in perspective was that I had to pick my Dad's car up from the dealer after some warrantee repairs....the shop was 30 miles out and a friend was to drive dad's car home,since at 80 years old he can't drive the highways.The trip required we pass through one of the few toll booths in the state for the first time since the state installed a "Speedi-Pass" system.My friend pointed out the new video surveillance cameras and that the state had recently passed a series of draconian fines for anyone "running" the tolls....So here we are-modern technology and the power of the state to crush a 50 cent violator of road use taxes,while the President of the country can announce on live tv multiple violations of Federal laws (including the 4th ammendment rights of 200 million citizens just today) and a vast majority of our elected representatives think that a motion of censure-that's right-words, is TOO heavy a penalty to consider.....our elected representatives can bite my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. It all started when in 2000
he "Broke the law" and put himself on the throne
thru election fraud and manipulating some judges in FL to declare himself victor.

He broke laws then and the NSA wiretap is nothing more than an extension of the same thought process...
Americans should have been outraged then and should be outraged now but most my friends don't even know the NSA tapped their phones.... sad.....

From this simple first instance of ignoring the rule of law, and Americans unwilling to fight or stand up for election fraud the way the russians did after their fraudulent election, has led us to this problem of an alcoholic that keeps drinking and we keep enabling his habit.

what must America do now, within the rule of law, or short of a revolution to reverse the broken laws and restore order to our country? or has Bush appointed too many wackos that will take 20 years to clean out of government and the election fraud so rampant, complete reversal of order is becoming near impossible?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC