Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran Hostage Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:44 AM
Original message
Iran Hostage Scandal
If it can ever be proven that Ronald Reagan and George Bush actively worked to stop Iran from releasing the American Hostages until after the election and Ronald Reagan was elected is that treason? Also, what would that do to his legacy? I think Reagan if you truly look at his legacy already had a horrible legacy. However, would putting the lives of American hostages in jeopardy in order to get elected just totally destroy what many Americans think of him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. sadly, I think it wouldn't matter
why listen to the media when all it does is lie, right? Everyone knows Ronnie was great, right? </sarcasm>

fwiw, I agree with you that Reagan's voodoo administration (or as I like to call it, George H.W. Bush's first two terms) was the perfect propaganda machine, and sadly they got away with murder and came out smelling like roses. Reagan is the hero to many on the right and quite a few in the middle, and I fear most would ignore the truth if it came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sacrificing American lives for their purposes is what Reagan-Bush do best.
Any reason why they should change a winning act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it would change his image. Nothing worse than stealing
an election by working with the enemy. Maybe that's why * is so bent on invading Iran - destroy the evidence. There was some speculation that was one of the reasons for invading Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. what do you mean "if?" it has been
beyond a shadow of a doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC