Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reporter who wrote the USAToday NSA story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:44 PM
Original message
The reporter who wrote the USAToday NSA story
gave a campaign contribution of $2,000 to a Democrat a couple of years ago.

On that basis, Freeperland and RW blogs are all up in arms saying the USAToday story is false and is just a hit piece.

What a sorry piece of garbage the GOP has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scribe Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Journalists shouldn't contribute to campaigns, join organizations or even
party with people they may be covering. It just begs for a charge of bias whenever the reporter writes or broadcasts. An anchor in NYC was roundly criticized years ago for contributing to a political campaign (Steve Forbes) and rightly so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Media Trying to prove no liberal bias is what gave RW GOP control of media
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scribe Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Remember Media is plural. The RW GOP doesn't control it all
but what concerns me most is the effect the marketplace is having on major media outlets. Right-wing idiots seem to dominate all of local talk radio because so few liberal shows have succeeded.

Fox News Channel skews old but even in the critical 25-54 demographic, FNC gets 267-thousand across prime time to MSNBC's 114-thousand. That translates into real market pressure. I worry that MSNBC executives thought "Alan Keyes is Making Sense" would be a hit.

I don't think they were trying to make a statement about their political leanings but trying to improve their profit statement. The good news is the Keyes show was a total bomb but the bad news is that O'Reilly is still clobbering Olberman.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. GE/MSNBC killed Donahue when it was pushing 607000 -its #1 show

Donahue's other number was only a little lower than current hero Keith Olbermann.

It has nothing to due with profits - at least at GE.

The infomercial setup for Rush and others that Scafie/Murdock set up meant no risk for the radio stations - indeed Scafie suffered the $50 million loss on Rush year after year.

The economics of RW control is not coming from the "get to be popular and get commercials and get more airtime via more stations" concept. I wish it was that simple.

But you are correct that Jone s Network, AirAmerica and individual non-RW shows do exist and prosper - but the stranglehold that is RW media dominance of all talk is more a consequence of a couple of billionaires political leanings, a few corporations controlled by defense contractors, and board room political correctness of being right wing that gets editors and producers that want to advance - or just keep their job - self censoring so as to appear RW.

The board room Political correctness I know first hand - I was never in one where there was anyone as left - or more left - than myself. And my stay at that lofty perch was quite short and 20 years ago because of those political views - even though those views were well suppressed of course (granted I am not as smooth as most of the folks in DU's R/T can confirm! :-) ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. MUAHAHAHAHAHA
"RW GOP doesn't control it all"

hehehehehe. Yer funny. Enjoy yer stay here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scribe Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The RW GOP Controls DU too? Or is this not a medium?
Could your response be any more juvenile or irrelevant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. When Dearest Husband was a political/ investigative reporter,
he never voted and never even registered to vote.

I was appalled (I vote every time the polls are open) but he insisted that he wanted to make no commitment that could in any way influence his objectivity.

He is no longer a reporter, and is now a committed liberal, working hard for our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But this USAToday reporter is a financial reporter
She reported on telcos in the normal course of her finacial reporting and then stumbled into this story.

She is not a political reporter so what difference should it have made that she gave money to the Gore campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It doesn't make any difference to me.
I was just talking about the incredibly high standards some members of the press have - - or had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. It amazes me
that the front-line defenders of the First Amendment are often forbidden to exercise it when they aren't at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anderson Cooper gave to Smirk
I guess that makes him as much of a hack as this dope. Andn which one gets more air time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ask them for proof
They're notorious liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC