Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

explosive? possible split in the republican party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:51 PM
Original message
explosive? possible split in the republican party
well, now this is getting real interesting ... we've all been looking to the left and focusing on the Dem vs. Green rift ... well, there just might be a new kid on the block ...

some proposed topics for discussion:
1. will this really signal a major split in the republican party?
2. could this splinter group attract centrist Dems (like a "gang of 14" party)?
3. might this trigger a split in the Democratic Party between the progressive wing and the Clinton wing?
4. is this all a bunch of media hype and nonsense and nothing will change in that the two major parties will retain more than 95% of the vote?


In Open Split with Bush, Top US Conservative Calls for Independent Movement

The patriarch of US conservatives has urged his followers to halt their financial support of the Republican Party and start an independent movement, signaling a major political shift that could result in heavy losses for the US ruling party in upcoming elections.

Viguerie also called congressional Republicans "unprincipled power brokers", whose agenda "comes from big business".

Richard Viguerie, who was instrumental in cementing the winning coalitions behind Ronald Reagan in 1980 and George W. Bush in 2000, declared that conservatives were "downright fed up" with both the president and Republican-controlled Congress.

"At the very least, conservatives must stop funding the Republican National Committee and other party groups," Viguerie wrote in a lengthy essay in The Washington Post Sunday.

He suggested conservatives "redirect their anger into building a third force," which he defined as a movement independent of any party, and laying the groundwork for the 2008 election campaign.

read the full article here ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. One can only hope the RNC implodes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish they only had this foresight about 8 years ago.
Fools, can't do anything right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. We might have a chance, if...
We stop tearing each others guts out and go after the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. I chose option 4. This is just a power play to force more
concessions on the guest worker program.

That group may have money and control of the far-right fundies but they will not be giving up their current access to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is ****waaaaaaay**** too 'inside baseball' to be a ploy .....
..... or so it seems to me.

Viguerie is back room sort of figure. He's allowed himself some exposure from time to time, but mostly his sort of activity is better done in the shadows.

He's also an old time mover and shaker, with ties to Rev Moon, among others. He went with the religiously insane for a time, but largely, it seems to me, to further a cause that help his cause, not for anything principled, one way or the other, to do directly with the Christofacists.

His influence is largely among the think tankers and party insiders. He's not so much a public opinion leader in his own right. He's role has been to provide tools for the nutters to use (direct mail and very targeted marketing), not to be a spokesman for the nutters.

For him to come out with this now bodes well for our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yawn
Viguerie complaining about big business having too much power? Sounds like a parody to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC