Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHAT THE FU**??? HAYDEN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RUMPLEMINTZ Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:18 AM
Original message
WHAT THE FU**??? HAYDEN
confirmed 78-15. How in the world could so many democrats vote for this fascist sonofabitch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blackmail?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. easy . . . they're part of the problem . . .
and, therefore, not part of the solution . . .

anyone who thinks that most House and Senate Democrats are anything other than BushCo enablers hasn't been paying sufficient attention . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You sure got that right...it is time to CLEAN HOUSE!!! (and Senate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, let's get rid of DINO's like Bayh
oh wait... he voted "nay."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's Probably Going to Be Another Brownie
and will be out of office before you know it. Bush's appointments that can be gone are going. Too bad the Supreme Court isn't like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. No kidding, what is with that appointed for life bullshit?
Absolutely a stupid idea. Even though the founding fathers had some great ideas, that was not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Well, to be fair, at the time "life" meant maybe 25 years --
Edited on Fri May-26-06 10:15 AM by NCevilDUer
it took a man into his 40's to develop a sterling reputation to qualify for the court, and 70 was way above average for the lifespan. Don't have the stats, but I'd bet that the vast majority of SC appointees in the first hundred years sat for fewer than 25 years, and a significant number for fewer than 20.

Now, we get a Roberts or Scalia or Thomas in their forties, and expect to see them on the bench for 40 years. That's a significant difference. That should be reviewed. Maybe put a 25 year cap on appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's a good thing that people don't live to be 800 years old like they
used to in the first centuries. I mean, who could forsee that they would live for so long? Imagine a Scalia on the Supreme Court for like 760 years.

I think a 400 year cap would have been appropriate back then. LOL



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. seriously people
Edited on Fri May-26-06 09:59 AM by Teaser
you know the Democrats strategy by now don't you? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out...

They are going to lay low until the elections and hope that by not stirring up any trouble they will look wise and statesmanlike and win big.

Is this a foolish strategy? I think so. Is it likely to work? Probably not. Will we win anyway? Perhaps.

But this is the strategy they've adopted. Shouting

ZOMG! WHY WONT THE DEMS SHOW SOME BACKBONE! WTF!!!111!!!

Every time this happens is just a ridiculous outcry, and its tiresome. Complain about them if you want, but don't act surprised...because you know why they're doing it. Puffing out your chests to show you've got the biggest outrage on the block only impresses the n00bs. And not even them soooo much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. i wish i could say i was shocked but i can't.
Edited on Fri May-26-06 09:53 AM by chimpsrsmarter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reid, as minority leader would have been the one to "use the
powder" on this nominee, but he voted for his confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC