Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Haditha Massacre update -- how is anyone in US not ashamed of our war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:04 PM
Original message
Haditha Massacre update -- how is anyone in US not ashamed of our war?
Update on the little-reported Haditha massacre, plus word of another alleged incident of innocent Iraqi civilians being killed by US Marines:
Investigators believe that their criminal investigation into the deaths of about two dozen Iraqi civilians points toward a conclusion that Marines committed unprovoked murders, a senior defense official said Friday.

The Marine Corps initially reported 15 deaths and said they were caused by a roadside bomb and an ensuing firefight with insurgents. A separate investigation is seeking to determine if Marines lied to cover up the killings....

On Wednesday, the Marines disclosed that they also have asked for a criminal investigation into allegations that an unspecified number of Marines killed an Iraqi civilian west of Baghdad on April 26.


No doubt, a key reason these stories haven't gotten traction in the US media is our inhuman ability to discount Iraqi deaths, even when they've been perpetrated in our name.

Aren't these the people whose freedom is so important that we need to send our children into harm's way to get it for them? Or are we sticking to the story that that we incorrectly believed their leaders had WMD, in which case the tens of thousands of dead civilians are collateral damage to our ignorance and arrogance. Either way, where is our shame and remorse?

And why aren't we incensed when Donald Rumsfeld has no better rationale for this misadventure than to resume conflating Iraq and 9/11?

Shouldn't we, at the very least, insist that the nightly news give us an honest, updated account of how many Iraqis have been killed in our war? Oh, no, we couldn't do that, because we need to be protected from such ugliness. If only the people of Iraq could be so safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. WE are insisting on it...
They're just ignoring us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. The media shares and supports Bushco's corporate worldview.
They lie and coverup for Bushco which is why there is a multitude of blogs on the net. Lots of people are incensed but their dissent is not getting mention in MSN.

You comments about insisting that MSN be honest is naive. Do you not understand that the nightly news is simply an extension of Bushco?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm not so cynical that I've stopped insisting on an honest media...
... nor so naive that I expect it any time soon.

Also, I'm disappointed that the lefty bloggers haven't run with this story in a big way. Mostly, I think, it's because it's progressed in dribs and drabs.

As one old enough to remember how My Lai helped start sowing doubts about Vietnam in Middle America, I think we should devote more blogspace to this story, which like Abu Ghraib signals how warped our occupation of Iraq is.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. the bloody indifference of the M$M is stunning!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. cover-up Mai-Lai #2 ... please don't let America see the truth
It was not until the Mai-Lai "incident" that the tables of VietNam began to seriously turn.

This could well be the turning point for U.S. OUT OF IRAQ!

However, it seems like to me that they don't want the American people to know this atrocity has occurred. WE KNOW!!

:dem: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree, and also...
... I think the public is more willfully ignorant.

In the '60s, we expected the media to tell us the ugly truth, with Time and Life magazine and Walter Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley giving us body counts and disturbing images from Vietnam, and we were finally ready to see other long-hidden stories like despair in the Jim Crow South and in the inner-city.

But when we traded in Jimmy Carter's honesty for Ronald Reagan's phony "Pleasantville" world, we didn't speak out when the Fairness Doctrine was repealed, and we've barely squawked as the news has become louder and louder and shallower and shallower.

That's of course why some of us turn to places like DU, but it's a shame that we need them soooo much. In a better America we wouldn't.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. willfully ignorant indeed
Edited on Fri May-26-06 04:40 PM by CountAllVotes
It is just a wonderful excuse to say you simply do not know the truth because you weren't exposed to it. However, if you have been so exposed and then claim dumb, you are the idiot IMO.

This cannot go on.

There will be more if it does.

The longer it goes on, the more things will happen. That is the lesson that war teaches us. It drives the otherwise "sane" person to do insane things, like carry out massacres as we see *again*.

Lesson #1: WAR IS HELL. (Learned yet I ask?)

My Lai was a lesson that must never be forgotten. I remember it well and I remember how it affected me. I was shocked and found it to be disgusting and horrific.

It was after this, that the Vietnam war became highly unpalatable to all.

So maybe this is perhaps just a sample of what it will take. I hope it will be the only sample to be honest with you as I despise war and have always been anti-war for many reasons.

If we were not here on the DU, maybe we'd be out organizing or something like we did in the past. I remember what I did. I wasn't home at a computer - I was out doing things, going places, etc. However, I must add that that was 30+ years ago and age has caught up with me.

On edit: I'm with you on the the media. It is CNN and FOX 24/7. No more nightly news with Huntley and Brinkley. They do not want nor encourage a real honest to God journalist to thrive in this day! What a HUGE loss this is. We are repressing the best and the brightest among us.

:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demswin06 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. i guess that this is nothing more than....
"liberating" the Iraqis from a brutal dictator. The only things that we've "liberated" from the Iraqis are their oil,their electricity,their water,their culture,and now their lives.;( :mad: :puke: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Quote from a discussion with a freeper type
A few months back, I took on a rabid winger in a supposedly neutral forum where liberals were badly outnumbered.

He made some points about the Kurds, pushing the usual "would you prefer Saddam were still in power?" garbage.

I challenged him on how deep his abiding interest in the Kurds was, and he at least gave me an honest answer:

"I don't have the least interest in the kurds. only in your party's shameful past which you all are in thorough denial of."

The idea that any wingut would be losing sleep over the lot of people living in Iraq, if it weren't the favorite stomping-to-death ground of the Bush family, is laughable. A sick laugh, given what they've done, but a laugh nonetheless. And now that we are dealing with the so-called "Pottery Barn" rule, they still don't care.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusGail Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wasn't "house arrest" the only punishment Calley received
My memory may be deceiving me, but I'm sure Calley (the "man" responsible for My Lai) was given only house arrest. The marines responsible for the Haditha massacre, if found guilty, may only get a dishonorable discharge.

I am sure this is only the tip of the iceberg because the reporting of this war has been sanitized so much.

Has society stooped so low as to train these soldiers into natural born killers. If they survive this war, any one of them could end up living next door to any one of you. What a very scary thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Kubrick, of course, crystallizes this
"Full Metal Jacket," especially the first half, does a great job showing how military training can fuck you up.

The part where the drill sgt. brags about real-life Marines who became murderers is especially chilling in this context.

It's a testament to the human spirit how many people can go through it, and battle itself, and *not be* fucked up. You'd have to think that being in a war like Vietnam or Iraq where the mission is so dubious has to be incredibly hard on the soul.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. For this performance of "War With Vietnam's Fingerprints All Over It"
The role of My Lai will be played by the cityof Haditha.

:(
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good thing the Swift Boaters, et al. revised Vietnam history
For decades, it was understood that Vietnam was a tragic mistake.

But when it came time to whitewash Dubya's record by besmirching Kerry's, we were told that Hanoi Jane was the real villian, not the Johnsons and Nixons who sent so many of our young men their to kill and die for no reason.

So, now when we compare Iraq to Vietnam, we're comparing it to a good war that we would've won if it weren't for cowards like John Kerry. If only Dick Chaney hadn't had other priorities -- I'll bet he could have Ramboed us to victory.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusGail Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just curious
Has Fox News (fair & balanced) made any mention of this atrocious massacre? If so, what spin did they put on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I haven't watched tv
for a while, so can't say what the cable channel's said.

The website denounces it as an atrocity. Spin in the same direction as most other media sources: it's an atrocity, if the men did it they should be punished; punishing higher up would require some sort of evidence showing that they did more than simply create the pre-conditions for the atrocity, but three officers are suspended (in other words, pretty much the default assumption). No assumption as to how frequent or infrequent atrocities are (which itself is also a neutral enough assumption).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC