Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is your favorite name for GOP politicians?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: What is your favorite name for GOP politicians?
The tyranny of the majority

The message of God's Own Party is not "we have good ideas, let us try them", because they've been tried and they've failed. The message of the Republicangelicals is not, "work with us and together we can make the world better", it's "we won so sit down and shut up." The message of the "morals and values" party is not one of the power of humility and compassion, but one of fear and intimidation. Everything different is viewed as a threat.

The message of God's Own Party is not "we have good ideas, let us try them", because they've been tried and they've failed. The message of the Republicangelicals is not, "work with us and together we can make the world better", it's "we won so sit down and shut up." The message of the "morals and values" party is not one of the power of humility and compassion, but one of fear and intimidation. Everything different is viewed as a threat.


http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/06/new-orleans-gop-senator-da_114969333621714447.html

There is a problem with the whole "state's rights" and "judicial activism" arguments that the "God before country" extremists are making. If Oregon passes a law allowing physician-assisted suicide, the state doesn't have that right, and the judges who ban it are "strict constitutionalists." But if a state passes a ban on a practice that is allowed for some, it is a "state's rights" issue. This is an absurd contradiction that cannot be reconciled.

It is the role of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws, no matter how transiently popular they may be, in order to guarantee ALL of us the rights granted by the Supreme Law of the Land.

This is not "a Christian Nation", subordinate to the Bible. It is a land of laws, and the constitution reigns over the Bible WHETHER YOU LIKE IT, OR NOT.

A majority taken collectively is only an individual, whose opinions, and frequently whose interests, are opposed to those of another individual, who is styled a minority. If it be admitted that a man possessing absolute power may misuse that power by wronging his adversaries, why should not a majority be liable to the same reproach? Men do not change their characters by uniting with one another; nor does their patience in the presence of obstacles increase with their strength. For my own part, I cannot believe it; the power to do everything, which I should refuse to one of my equals, I will never grant to any number of them.


Quotes and Footnotes source: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/DETOC/1_ch15.htm

Footnotes:

No one will assert that a people cannot forcibly wrong another people; but parties may be looked upon as lesser nations within a great one, and they are aliens to each other. If, therefore, one admits that a nation can act tyrannically towards another nation, can it be denied that a party may do the same towards another party?


And

I presume that it is scarcely necessary to remind the reader here, as well as throughout this chapter, that I am speaking, not of the Federal government, but of the governments of the individual states, which the majority controls at its pleasure.


Great moments in the same-sex marriage debate http://www.senatemajority.com/inhofe_family_not_gay.html

During today's same-sex marriage amendment debate, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) used a prop of a blown-up photo of his family (some 20 people or so). Gesturing towards the photo, he said:

(MR. INHOFE) As you see here, and I think this is maybe the most important prop we'll have during the entire debate, my wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I'm really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we've never had a divorce or any kind of a homosexual relationship.

Um, wow. The Inhofes' very married, very not gay family pictured below.

The above picture was taken off of Inhofe's website. You can visit at inhofe.senate.gov. But be careful, once you start poking around on Inhofe's office computers for pictures, you never know what you'll find....

July 20, 1999 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1589/is_1999_July_20/ai_55183016

Inhofe's porn-gate - discovery of Internet pornography on Sen James Inhofe's office computers forces him to withdraw opposition to gay ambassador-designate James Hormel - Brief Article

It seems there is nothing like a good sex scandal to hammer some sense into antigay politicians. Just days after the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported that aides in Sen. James Inhofe's office had downloaded massive quantifies of Internet pornography, Inhofe announced that he would drop his threat to block all nominations by President Clinton.

The Oklahoma Republican made the threat after Clinton employed a rarely used executive privilege during Congress's Memorial Day recess to make philanthropist James Hormel the first openly gay U.S. envoy. Inhofe had led an 18-month battle to block Hormel's nomination as ambassador to Luxembourg even though a majority of senators indicated they were prepared to approve the nomination.

Inhofe said he dropped the threat because Clinton had written to Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) saying that he "made it a practice to notify Senate leaders in advance of our intentions in this regard, and this precedent will continue to be observed."

But gay rights groups jumped on Inhofe's scandal nonetheless. The pornographic material was found during a routine check of his office computer system. Roll Call reported that there was such a huge volume of sexually explicit material that it had "messed up the senator's computer system." The newspaper did not describe what kind of X-rated material was found.

"Senator Inhofe's staff should have used their highly honed Internet skills to download the Constitution instead of pornography," said David Smith, communications director for the gay lobbying group Human Rights Campaign, in a press release. "They would have learned that there isn't a constitutional right to place a hold on nominations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Elephants Asses....
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really kind of like
ChristoFascist NeoCon Zombie Brigade. It rolls off the tongue really nicely and it describes the despicable pricks perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Mary Scott O'Connor gets the credit
For "ChristoFascist NeoCon Zombie Brigade". I posted the same poll on MyLeftWing, and on Kos.

So far "ChristoFascist NeoCon Zombie Brigade" is leading, everywhere.

If the foo shits...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am partial to RepubliCons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Elephants asses and Republicons are good, too...
...and I probably should have included "hypocrites", now that I think of it.

Didja see Bill Bennet on Stewart last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Con jobs, con artists and convicts
RepubliCons works for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffee_and_cream Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. The Con-cons... coo-coo-coo-coo
"Con jobs, con artists and CONVICTS"... :headbang: :yourock: hehehe... that's more i like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Welcome aboard c&c
(and thank you)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about "Godless"?? Don't know where I thought that one up...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Phreow! There are a LOT of them, aren't there?
"Godless"

That's another one I should have included.

"Antichrists" has always been a favorite of mine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry...
but I resent that "drunken sailor" metaphor. I've seen a few drunken sailors (been one once or twice) and they don't act like republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Before I aplogize, let me ask this
Don't drunken sailors spend government money like Republicangelicals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Actually.....
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 09:05 PM by Turbineguy
I should have included....::sarcasm:

Therefore, no apologies needed!:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. LOL
I sort of knew that, but thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Other ............ They are SHITSTAINS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Right Wing Whackos, I like, because
they're always whacking someone, whether it's us, Iran, North Korea, the UN, Hans Blix, the Judiciary, Bill of Rights, gays, and anyone else who might dare criticize their narrow view of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. We call 'em Repugnants & Nixon Youth
Nixon Youth - Just look around the Bush Crime Family and you'll find Nixon leftovers everywhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNMOM Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. ignorant assholes. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good ol' /God's Own Pharisees
Pharisees

Those who practice hypocritical observance of the letter of religious or moral law without regard for the spirit; sanctimoniousness.

Those who are hypocritically self-righteous and condemnatory.

Evil persons who pretend to be holy or good; hypocrites.
ETYMOLOGY:From the simile applied by Jesus to hypocrites, Pharisees (Matthew 23:27).





http://www.bartleby.com/am/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC