Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repug Endorse Amnesty For Terrorists As Iraqi PM Fires Aid Who Proposed i

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:37 AM
Original message
Repug Endorse Amnesty For Terrorists As Iraqi PM Fires Aid Who Proposed i

t.

Gosh --what a mess.


Republican Senators Endorse Amnesty For Terrorists As Iraqi PM Fires Aid Who Proposed It...

After one of his top aides told a reporter that Iraq was "ready to give amnesty to the so-called resistance," Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki scrambled to distance himself from the idea that he would pardon insurgents who had killed American troops. As Senate Democrats called for President Bush to denounce an amnesty plan, Maliki accepted the resignation of the aide, Adnan Ali al-Kadhimi, and issued a statement saying that the aide "does not represent the government on this issue," although previous statements indicated that Maliki was indeed prepared to offer amnesty to any fighters that "were not involved in the shedding of Iraqi blood."

Meanwhile, five members of the GOP Senate took the floor and declared support for the amnesty proposal. Senator Ted Stevens (R-Ak.) said, "if that's amnesty, I'm for it," while Senator Cornyn (R-Tx.) called the amnesty debate a "distraction."

Read the report of comments from these Senators, as well as Senators McConnell (R-Ky.), Alexander (R-Tn.) and Chambliss (R-Ga.) here.
Click here to read the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. seems like the Repugs can not speak in 'one voice' either-yet all we
we hear is how the dems are split on Irag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't The Geneva Convention give citizens the right to resist occupation
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 06:53 AM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Technically yes...
but only from reprisals from foriegn occupiers. After a legitimate government is established, they can set there own rules for their own citizens. This is assuming that the current Iraqi government could be considered legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Geneva Convention?
What Geneva Convention? The US does not recognize any stinkin Geneva Convention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC