If we've learned one thing in recent years, it's that no one is safe when the Republican Party has its hands on the levers of power. The first casualty, of course, has been the truth, mainly in the form of a
servile press corps more interested in access than excellence. And, while the Fourth Estate has largely abdicated its role as check on unchecked power, the Bush administration has been a
willing accomplice, its pat on the back being the last shove necessary to send the press over the cliff's edge.
Those few still unwilling to toe the party line, those pernicious pests who have decided that the truth remains important, have proven to be an even larger target to the right wing. Consider the baseless attacks made against people like Seymour Hersh, outlets like Air America and organizations like Media Matters. And now Keith Olbermann.
To be truthful, Olbermann has been a thorn in the Republicans' side for quite some time. But, thanks to an assist from gossip merchant Lloyd Grove, it appears the right wing is poised to renew its fight on the present-day Edward R. Murrow, one of the final obstacles standing between America and a tin-pot dictatorship.
The furor began earlier this week, when Grove, writing in the New York Daily News, led off a piece with an item
titled "It's 'Putdown With Keith Olbermann'". In the story, he offered new
MSNBC new chief Dan Abrams some unsolicited advice:
Put out the fire between Olbermann and the third-rate grief chaser Rita Cosby. Grove then cited a months-old e-mail between Olbermann and a "fan" - who submitted the missive under condition of anonymity - in which the "Countdown" host said of Cosby, "Rita's nice, but dumber than a suitcase of rocks." Cosby's response was a cryptic, "Keith got it wrong. I'm not that nice."
Maybe so, but you're not dumber than a suitcase of rocks?Back to Grove, the columnist himself became the story Thursday when, in his
column, he reported forwarding additional e-mails to MSNBC management in an effort to put Olbermann on the defensive. The messages in question featured the senders claiming that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was Olbermann's "hero". One response? Wrote Olbermann, "Hey, save the oxygen for somebody whose brain can use it. Kill yourself." Grove also cited other Olbermann responses, which included such statements as "Given how far you are from knowing your a- from your elbow about my industry, you couldn't be stupider, wronger, or dumber ...", "Go - your mother." and "You 'Americans' still watching that evil f- O'Reilly?"
Once he forwarded Olbermann's messages to his management, the anchor issued an apology. "I apologize to anyone who might take offense at my part of this correspondence," he said. "It goes without saying that I should not have replied to these abusive and hateful e-mails, but I wonder how many of us could receive literally hundreds of them questioning our patriotism, religion and ethnic origin, without succumbing to the natural wish to confront such hate?" Grove then took a slight at Olbermann's ratings relative his Fox News competitor, Bill O'Reilly. And, with that, the next right-wing crusade has apparently begun.
This is how it works with the
Ann Coulter Republicans. Olbermann says things in e-mails that would pass as civilized conversation among most Republicans and, all of a sudden, he's the target. He'll no doubt join the Ward Churchills, Michael Moores and Cindy Sheehans of the world on the list of approved right-wing targets every Democrat must answer to before beginning any discussion. Though he was responding to no-doubt hate-filled invective, now
he's the bad one. He's the one who must answer to his critics, not people like
Glenn Beck. Or
Bill Bennett. Or
O'Reilly.
Think about the spotlight someone like Olbermann is under. As one of the sole sane voices in the media, he's the admitted target of right-wing rancor. I see my fair share of Republican "compassion" in the form of
angry,
insult-laden comments and
messages. Now, multiply that to Olbermann's profile and you can imagine how vociferously the forces of hate fight the truth. Day in and day out, it's a safe bet that Olbermann's inbox is filled with a series of e-mails that would no doubt outpace any response of his Grove printed.
And that's the thing. Olbermann was
responding. Responding to a string of messages clearly intended to bait the intelligent, composed anchor into a less civil response. But how much attention is being paid to the fact that most of what Olbermann said came only after being
lured into such a reply? What Grove printed came from two antagonistic individuals who wrote Olbermann using tired, right-wing rhetoric, clearly looking for a fight. When they got it, they ran, like
cowards, to Grove, who gladly guaranteed their anonymity.
Why? Because, who cares who does the pushing when someone famous, someone in your crosshairs, does the pushing back? So much for
fair. So much for
balanced.Ask yourself what's
really at play here. This type of "Daddy, look what the big, mean man said to me" gotcha journalism, while typical, seems like only a means to an end in this case.
The end? Either make Olbermann, not what he covers, the story, or force MSNBC management to make a choice between the besieged anchor and the less harmful, yet lower-rated, dumber-than-a-suitcase-of-rocks Cosby. Could this be a coordinated effort to get one of the last true journalists off the air? Perhaps, because it's quite likely that some people are far more upset about what Olbermann's saying on the air than off it.
How could you, as a Republican, like what Olbermann has to say on a nightly basis? Being confronted with the truth by a journalist has to be, while rare these days, an unsettling occurrence for the right wing. Having your dismal record thrown right back at you by someone far more intelligent than you surely wears on a person. Couple that with the oversized Republican persecution complex and the Republicans' seeming inability to
change the channel and it's clear that the
Nuisance Generation has yet again sprung into action. And this time, they're attacking one of our once-great nation's last, best voices.