Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

they are trying to stir us up against a RIFLE PLANT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:03 PM
Original message
they are trying to stir us up against a RIFLE PLANT?
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 07:04 PM by dionysus
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2344473

President Hugo Chavez's plans to build the first Kalashnikov factory in South America are stirring fears Venezuela could start arming his leftist allies in the hemisphere with Russian assault rifles.

Chavez denies such ambitions, saying his government bought 100,000 Russian-made AK-103 assault rifles and a license from Moscow to make Kalashnikovs and ammunition to bolster its defenses against ``the most powerful empire in history'' - the United States.

Some political opponents and critics suspect Chavez, a former paratrooper, has other intentions, such as providing allies like Bolivia and Cuba with arms while forging an anti-Washington military alliance.

RIFLES!?!?!?!?!?!? RIFLES ARE THE NEW WMD?!?!?! the fuck these guys are smoking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rifles are only for the republicon "elite" (Bush's "Have Mores")
Edited on Sun Jun-18-06 07:13 PM by SpiralHawk
As corrupt republicon cronies get their Satanic chisto-fascist state more deeply entrenched, they will begin to confiscate arms from regular citizens, regular human beings, and anyone the republicon so-called "elite" designates as a "non-believer"*


* non-believer in their Satanic christo-fascist propaganda to benefit the fat-cat ELITE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The problem is that they are not buying from the biggest arms dealer in
THE WORLD THE USA. They are railing against the populist movement sweeping S. America. How dare they actually spend money providing houses and clean watter to the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. So the U.S. is afraid they're going to be squeezed out of the market?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kalashnikovs are superior to the M-16s
and if there is anything our own military has now come to fear, thanks to the Iraqi experience, is a well-armed citizenship!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Problem's not buying them from US, but
a profound distrust of Chavez. The article says as much, but that's easy enough to overlook.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-103

These aren't just rifles. They're assault rifles. And not the watered-down 'assault rifle' verbiage used in Congress and the MSM, which are semi-automatic look-alikes.

A fine insurgency weapon, which is why Chavez wants them; AKs are better than M16s in low-maintenance/low-training settings. So did the weapons used by the Sandistas were AKs, Cuban hand-me-downs, though of a different number and slightly different design. And probably the Sendero luminoso used AKs. And probably FARC does to this day. And the Columbian paramilitaries, I'd venture on a guess.

Trust Chavez implicitly and this isn't a problem. Don't trust him, it's a problem; but it doesn't mean that the reasoning can't be understood.

And WMD is the wrong phrase; MWD would be better. Not weapons of mass destruction, but mass-produced weapons of destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-18-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Insurgency? Is someone planning to invade Venezuela, also?
I have no problem with that factory which will be used to help defend that country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. If we invaded Venezuela, we'd
set up a government, and have what could plausibly be called an insurgency on our hands. It seems to be an element of Chavez' political beliefs that such a threat is real. Others assume that his claimed beliefs are so implausible as to be a subterfuge.

I think of 'insurgency' as an unmarked term, simply implying something like an established government versus forces seeking to replace or at least remove that government. Others require finer distinctions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They're also inexpensive to manufacture
I'm sure that also played into the decision as well. There are better weapons to be had, but they can get expensive to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. anyone with an army should be able to buy as
many fucking rifles as they want. I can't believe this even makes the news....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wonder how the NRA will respond. (Odds are they don't.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. They really don't get the concept
of weapons and the military being used to defend the homeland.

If we had a crazy neighbor with an enormous crusading military bent on suppressing dissent worldwide, I would hope the government would buy us some rifles to keep in our houses.

But the US government has entirely forgotten what "Defense" means; they can only conceive the military as an expansionist tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC