Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now there's something else the matter with Kansas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:27 PM
Original message
Now there's something else the matter with Kansas
As of today, the tie goes to death. Courtesy of the high court's conservative majority, when juries in Kansas find that life in prison or the death penalty are equally supported by the evidence, they can strap 'em down, light 'em up, hang 'em high!

At Slate, one law professor explains that the "court held that a state can tell a capital sentencing jury that if factors favoring life and favoring death are in equipoise, the jury must decide for the death penalty".

When the evidence is in equipoise. That means just what it sounds like: "a state of intellectual or emotional balance". He goes on to relate that the "four dissenting justices call the Kansas 'tie goes to Death' law 'morally absurd.'"

Other reports also indicate that the deliberations were contentious.

The Kansas law could be used to execute people even when evidence justifying death is doubtful, four justices complained, calling the law "obtuse by any moral or social measure."

Justice Antonin Scalia fired back that the four liberal justices were contributing to international "sanctimonious criticism of America's death penalty.".....

He also said that there has been "sanctimonious criticism of America's death penalty" from people in other countries and that Monday's dissent "will be trumpeted abroad as vindication of these criticisms."


If only Tony had spent the day in church flipping off reporters. With Scalia so exercised, Clarence T must have been panting to oblige-

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing the 5-4 decision, said that states have wide discretion in imposing the death penalty. He said that liberal dissenters seemed to suggest that "abolition of the death penalty is the only answer to the moral dilemma" of an imperfect criminal justice system. "This court, however, does not sit as a moral authority," he wrote.


He's a real comedian. Thanks, to all three of the remaining felonious five. And thanks to Alito and Roberts, for just one more way to show the whole stinkin' world that we'll be just as barbaric as we please.

Thanks, too, to the Gang of Fourteen Fifteen.

Satan http://www.garden.force9.co.uk.nyud.net:8090/Other/Unjustice.gif

John S. McCain III, Arizona
Lindsey O. Graham, South Carolina
John Warner, Virginia
Olympia Snowe, Maine
Susan M. Collins, Maine
R. Michael DeWine, Ohio
Lincoln Chafee, Rhode Island

Joseph I. Lieberman, Connecticut
Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia
E. Benjamin Nelson, Nebraska
Mary Landrieu, Louisiana
Daniel Inouye, Hawaii
Mark Pryor, Arkansas
Ken Salazar, Colorado
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lordy... if there is a hell...
Clarence and Scalia are surely going to have lots of toasty company.... Somehow, though, fat Scalia is not nearly as repugnant to me as Thomas. Knowing as he does how unbalanced the system is towards African Americans--both in jail, and on death row--with little chance for adequate representation... Well, may Satan take him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I tell people, that the Bush administration
is going to try and re-instate slavery. It will go to the SCOTUS and Clarence will cast the deciding vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Supreme Court is nothing more than a travesty anymore...
Criminals in black robes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I certainly can't find it in me to hold them in the awe I once did.
The majesty of the law is incompatible with the likes of Scalia & Thomas, or the actions the Felonious Five. They stole our Country. I agree they are common criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, they've been a crap shoot for years...
When they upheld some of the nonsense that chipped away at the 4th Amendment just to proscute the so-called "War on Drugs" I lost any respect I had for the institution in the first place. The selection of Bush as President just finished off the last dregs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is a chilling quote from Scalia...
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a separate opinion today to defend the death penalty and the court's ruling in the Kansas case.

"The American people have determined that the good to be derived from capital punishment -- in deterrence, and perhaps most of all in the meting out of condign justice for horrible crimes -- outweighs the risk of error. It is no proper part of the business of this court, or of its justices, to second-guess that judgment, much less to impugn it before the world ... ," Scalia wrote.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-scotus0626,0,7609193.story?track=rss


"Outweighs the risk of error." I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Has there been a shred of proof that the death penalty is a deterrent?
Scalia just seems to take that "on faith"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It is an article of faith with him that executing people is such a good
thing that erroneous executions of innocent prisoners don't really matter. He might have been happier among the Puritans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Tie goes to death"
Game over.

Sick, sick way of dealing with the whole issue. And a symptom no doubt of a greater sickness festering in the entire court system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC