Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Great Disconnect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:14 PM
Original message
The Great Disconnect
The Great Disconnect
By Nancy Greggs

After reading David Horowitz’s recent piece...

(http://www.frontpagemag.com/blog/BlogEntry.asp?ID=676)

... I was prompted to respond – not because Mr. Horowitz or his ilk are persuadable from their position, and certainly not because he is worthy of comment, but because the disconnect that exists in these people’s minds is so glaring in its magnitude, it is becoming increasingly difficult to fathom how anyone with an IQ above a house plant can continue to be so blind to its proportions.

Mr. Horowitz writes that there is a war going on in this country, and on that point we are in total agreement. Where we differ is his assessment that the “aggressors in this war are Democrats, liberals and leftists who began a scorched earth campaign against President Bush before the initiation of hostilities in Iraq.”

As seemed obvious at the time, and is even more apparent when viewed in hindsight, there is the fact that this president and his administration, with full support from their party’s politicos, were the aggressors in a war on the American citizenry and our well-being as a nation. And it was, and still is, a war premised on division of the populace, pitting one citizen against the other on every issue from gay marriage rights to flag burning. It was the simple concept of divide and conquer, because a divided citizenry invariably stands on shaky ground and are thusly easier to manipulate than a unified populace.

Bush at el wasted no time, once securely ‘placed’ in office rather than having been elected to same, in dismantling every policy that might interfere with the bottom line of corporations, or the accumulation of wealth by the already wealthy. And they did so at the expense of hard-working citizens, and to the detriment of what once existed as “the American Dream”.

That, my friends, is a declaration of war in no uncertain terms.

Mr. Horowitz goes on to state: “The initiators of this war were Al Gore and Jimmy Carter who attacked the president's attempt to rally the world against Saddam's defiance of international law in September 2002 just after his appeal to the UN General Assembly.”

There again is that great disconnect. Mr. Horowitz simply chooses to ignore the fact that while Bush had not only the majority of Americans, but the majority of the citizens of the world at his back after the events of 9/11, he chose – deliberately and, some would say, with malice aforethought – to launch the invasion of a country that had no connection to the recent assault on US soil. And that he did so based on cherry-picked intelligence, questionable methods of obtaining said information, and outright lies, falls by the wayside in the arguments that the Horowitzes of the world continually raise.

“Coming from national leaders of the opposition party these were attacks unprecedented in the history of post-Civil War American politics.” I can only assume that Mr. Horowitz was out of town when the Republicans attempted to bring down the peace-and-prosperity Clinton presidency, a slam-fest which consisted, for the most part, of that disconnect between a politician’s personal and private life – a gap which the GOP scurries to narrow when it is someone else’s private life being discussed, and broadly widen when it is their own.

“The campaign began in earnest with Nancy Pelosi's attack on the liberation of Iraq as ‘too costly’ on April 13, 2003, the day American troops pulled down Saddam's statue …” Yes, Ms. Pelosi, like many Americans, looked down the road at the potential cost of Bush’s ill-advised little misadventure in the Middle East and foresaw a cost which, at the time, the country was being assured would consist of a minimum of dollar expenditure (as per Paul ‘This War Will Pay for Itself’ Wolfowitz), a war whose only casualties would be severe allergy attacks suffered by US soldiers exposed to too many flowers and sweets conferred by grateful ‘liberated’ Iraqis as they sauntered into Baghdad surrounded by cheering crowds.

Of course, we all know that little scenario didn’t quite pan out. But for the David Horowitz crowd, there is always that great disconnect between what really happened and their ongoing “Greeted as Liberators” dream which persists, at least in their own narrow minds, to this day.

Horowitz goes on: “… (this) was raised to the level of political sabotage of our troops in Iraq and America's war on terror when a Democratic chorus began hammering the commander-in-chief as a ‘liar’ over the 16 words about Saddam's effort to purchase fissionable uranium in Niger.”

Again that great disconnect between proven history and the Horowitz fairy-tale rears its naïve little head. He fails to acknowledge that the thinking person would view sending our military into battle without sufficient body armour and vehicle armour as being ‘sabotage of our troops’, a sabotage which carries far greater consequences than the failure to put a yellow ribbon on the front door and a picture of a smiling George ‘Mission Accomplished’ Bush action-figure in the living room curio cabinet.

Horowitz points to the ‘sixteen words’ as though they were the only little ‘fib’ the administration was caught in (and in retrospect, a fib which led to a larger fib, which led to the outing of a covert CIA agent, which led to the indictment of a White House insider … all appearing soon at a courthouse near you.)

As someone who has loathed Bush, his administration, and all they stand for since day one, I will openly admit that if the ‘sixteen words’ were the ONLY untruth uttered by this cabal, I would be begging my fellow Americans to cut them some slack. But there are those other pesky untruths that have surfaced unabatedly throughout this debacle, apparently all uttered and reiterated beyond Mr. Horowitz’s hearing.

I guess he, like many of the sheep who graze in the same field, has been out of earshot every time an administration spokesperson has had to backtrack on what was said not twenty-four hours before. So let’s just ignore the Curveballs, the aluminium rods, the mobile chemical labs, the drones that could deliver weapons in forty-five minutes, the weapons of mass destruction that were known to be located to the north, the south, the east and somewhat to the west. Apparently, those things were never announced, discussed, proffered to an unsuspecting American public – and damn that liberal media for playing fast and loose with exact quotes!

As Ari Fleischer once so eloquently said in answer to a journalist’s question about a presidential announcement in the first days of the war, “What the president will have meant is …” In other words, this is the truth until proven otherwise, at which time the truth will be subject to revision.

“The campaign to sabotage America's war against the Islamo-fascist enemy has continued unabated through Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, Fallujah, Haditha and the two intelligence programs that the New York Times exposed.”

Once again, Mr. Horowitz fails to connect the all-too-obvious dots. If you want to talk about fascism, you might want to take a look at a government that suspends what, under our Constitution, are defined as inalienable rights. A government that spies on its own citizenry, and then gets huffy when caught; a government that declares time-honored wartime rules of engagement as “quaint” and no longer valid. You might even take a closer look at a self-declared Christian president who not only sanctions but embraces torture – and, on that note, you might even question the mental stability of a leader who claims to hear the voice of God on a regular basis.

“Its agenda is to force an American defeat in Iraq using the model of Vietnam ("Bring the troops home," while the battle is in progress).” Yeah, you’ve got us there, David. What kind of an ‘agenda’ is it when Americans want to bring their troops home before even more of them die, or are maimed physically or psychologically to the point of no longer being able to function in their role as defenders of our nation?

What kind of madness is it that does not see the fruitfulness of continuing a battle that was lost the first time an innocent Iraqi was tortured at Abu Ghraib, the first time a blown-to-bits Iraqi child was written off as ‘collateral damage’, the first time the Iraqi people saw a billion-dollar US Embassy being constructed in their midst while, simultaneously, they were being told that our forces would leave their country as soon as requested to do so?

But Mr. Horowitz is not alone in having fallen into that great gap between fact and Admin-spin, between reality and rhetoric, between the story as it has unfolded and the fairy-tale we, as a nation, continue to be told.

Unfortunately, the great disconnect continues to be a black hole that swallows groups of people whole.

There are the Fundamentalists who do not see the disconnect between the tenets of their Christian faith and a president who endorses torture and the gutting of social programs that feed the hungry, house the homeless, and tend to the sick.

There are those who are blind to the disconnect between Republican policies that cut benefits to soldiers in combat and veterans who have already served valiantly and the admonishment to ‘support the troops”.

There are those who refuse to grasp the disconnect between a war that is costing US taxpayers billions of dollars per month and the fact that there are soldiers dying for want of a few hundred dollars worth of body armour or helmet inserts that could save their lives.

There are those who fail to see the disconnect between an administration that scolds its citizens to be vigilant against would-be terrorists in their midst, while negotiating the handing over of control of our ports to the very countries that have funded and shielded terrorists from abroad.

There are those, like Horowitz, who just choose to be the perpetually oh-so-blind, simply because they refuse to see.

As for Horowitz’s parting shot, “Let's hope the American people wise up and stop it in its tracks,” I can only impart the good news that the American people ARE wising up – and will eventually stop this war, and those who perpetrated it, in its tracks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked...of course...Recommended...of course...
And my only response is this line from one of my own recent rants...

"Freedom isn't free." As soon as someone explains to me how killing and dying in a dusty place across the ocean contributes to OUR freedom, I might be inclined to agree. Near as I can tell, with illegal wiretapping, illicit surveillance, and 'free speech zones,' we're paying one hell of a high price for increased restrictions on freedom. Tyranny isn't free either, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bingo, Nance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. One more rec for the greatest page. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's another K&R
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
Horowitz was a disgrace to the left in his younger days, then he became a disgrace to the right. The one constant has always been that he's a disgrace to America. If Dennis Miller thinks the guy is brainy, you just know he's an idiot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Horowitz is but one of the reasons that
"Ignorance is bliss" is so apropos when dealing with this disgusting admin and pundits. Great article as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Horowitz has truly fallen over the edge of delusion..
Near total disconnect from reality...
(sad, really)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Horowitz is a blight
Reading your post, I noticed something in his phrasing whereby he continues to this day to support a long-exposed lie:

Horowitz goes on: “… (this) was raised to the level of political sabotage of our troops in Iraq and America's war on terror when a Democratic chorus began hammering the commander-in-chief as a ‘liar’ over the 16 words about Saddam's effort to purchase fissionable uranium in Niger.”

To put it another way, according to Horowitz, Saddam really was seeking uranium, and those pesky Liberals could do nothing but call Bush a liar for it. Horowitz doesn't acknowledge that the sixteen words were a conscious lie. Instead--like all Conservative assholes--he objects to the exposure of a Republican wrong-doing, rather than to the commission of it. Wire-tapping, the outing of Plame, SWIFT, the list goes on and on--the crime isn't the subversion of the Constitution by Republicans; the crime is the revelation of that subversion.

What an asshole.


Great post, by the way! K/R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Top Notch Rant
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Veteran For Bush
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 03:47 PM by ejbr
I saw a "Veteran for Bush" bumper sticker on a beat up pick up truck today, complete with the American flag sticker and American flag antenna. It was as if I was looking at a "Veteran for David Duke" bumper sticker with confederate flags. I am completely disgusted with these people who refuse to wake up and smell the white phosphorous over Fallujah. Brava Nancy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Readers of Horowitz are in decline. He's a joke!
People are beginning to see through the Republican rhetoric. Lies, I should say.

Nice work, NanceGreggs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. David Horowitz is a self-termed "former Lenin-Marxist radical"
who "saw the light" and became a Republican. Now he thinks that people should listen to what he has to say.

My take on this: If someone was stupid enough to be a Lenin-Marxist radical in the first place, he/she is clearly too stupid to have a prominent role in public debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Just another type of totalitarian idiocy...
Same coin, different side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thank You!
I like your style and what you wrote! Keep it coming!
:)

:kick: and Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush betrayed those who trusted him
In the aftermath of 9/11 the American people were more united than they'd been in decades, and a president with mediocre approval ratings stood on the rubble and rallied the country behind him. His approval shot up to 90% and a good many Americans embraced George W. Bush and put their trust in him. Most of the world also stood beside the United States.

What did this president do with the tremendous political capital he gained from this national tragedy? Did he use it to further unite Americans and our longstanding allies in a concerted effort to root out terrorist organization and address the problems that fuel terrorism? No. He used his newfound political capital to push through a domestic political agenda far to the right of what he represented as a candidate and to implement a predetermined policy to invade and occupy a country that had nothing to do with attacks on America.

The administration of George W. Bush systematically and intentionally misrepresented the alleged threat from Iraq while doing everything they could to plant in the public mind a connection that our own intelligence agencies told them didn't exist between Iraq and the al Qaeda terrorist organization that attacked us.

This is perhaps the most heinous betrayal of public trust in our nation's history, horribly aggravated by the costs it has incurred in blood, treasure, and our national honor. The reasons we were given for this war and the assurances of a welcoming liberation financed by Iraqi oil have proven to be as false as those who uttered them.

The question is why. Why do a significant percentage of those who have been so cruelly betrayed continue to believe in this president? What is the nature of the disconnect between reality and belief?

I think it is inherent in human nature to consciously acknowledge that one could have been so wrong and so betrayed. It is much more emotionally palatable to believe the lie than to admit a painful truth.

Meanwhile, the real world continues to take its toll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nance, I can't believe this post slipped beneath my radar for two days.
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 10:30 PM by InternalDialogue
Your post is fantastic, as they always are.

K&R, and next time, I'm getting my backslap in sooner to you (edited to add: when I can still recommend it).

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Horowitz was a self-important snot back in the day and still is.
He has a cult following who preach "academic freedom" and have largely taken over the College Republican scene. He is not worth reading. His brigades are worth keeping tabs of, though. He is like the Paris Hilton of the Right: famous for being famous and he is famous because he tells us he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. Check out Clinton's approval vs. Bush's
Clinton had a lot Republicans who approved of him. Clinton had a Republican Secretary of Defense. Clinton, for all his faults (one main one), was a President of the United States. Bush is a mugger, a prion. He is the President of the Republicans, and we are all diminished by him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm in awe...
Nance, I'm in total awe of your expressive powers. I've been told that I have a way with words, but I have to bow to your superior skills. You're always eloquent and on target!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC