Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huff Post: Air America Radio (AAR): A Metaphor For Liberal Disunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:38 PM
Original message
Huff Post: Air America Radio (AAR): A Metaphor For Liberal Disunity
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 01:47 PM by Pirate Smile
Sheldon Drobny on Huffington Post.


Air America Radio (AAR): A Metaphor For Liberal Disunity

I appreciate the post yesterday by Brent Budowsky: Saving Air America, and Building Other Media Megaphones and Money Machines That Matter at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brent-budowsky/saving-air-america-and-b_b_24758.html. I have been in contact with him about some of his suggestions and criticisms which I think in some cases are valid. But, two of the comments from that post sum it up for the issues concerning AAR as follows:

“I enjoy Air America immensely because of high quality shows with Al Franken, Sam Seder and especially many of the talented local hosts (like Johnny Wendell in L.A. and Scooter in San Diego). But I am not clear on what this post is asking of Air America. This article seems to wonder all over the place. The only point I did understand is that Air America needs to do external advertising and I totally agree. They don't advertise anywhere - save for a few billboards in hippie neighborhoods. I suspect that the lack of advertising has something to do with the fact that Clear Channel owns (and controls?) many of their stations. I wish the author had addressed the Clear Channel connection, at least.

“This post completely bamboozles me. Is Air America in danger? I've read nothing about that (except that they have lost their affiliate here in Atlanta). And Mr. Budowsky writes as if there is some widely known problem. Where can I read about this?

Further, he seems to confuse talk radio with news radio. The expense of doing the latter is monumental compared to the former. Although I think it's a cool idea to use sources from the blogosphere to break news, stories need to verified independently before broadcast. As it is, the blogosphere suffers no consequences in passing off rumor as news. That won't fly in true investigative reporting on a more regulated medium.”


It is the fact that that most of the wealthy liberals will not support it financially that prevents AAR from doing many of the things that would make it very successful. I am not suggesting that AAR is going out of business. We are still shareholders of AAR and have our own disagreements with some management decisions but that is only natural in corporate America. The big problem has always been from the very start that rich liberals refuse to give it financial support and they make excuses for not making an investment in AAR that are disingenuous. The people who are funding AAR now are the same people who funded it originally including our venture fund.

But every big time investor who is a liberal shifts the due diligence process to one of their financial advisors as if this were a “garden variety” investment. It is not. With more financial support and the branding that AAR already has, the network could do all the things necessary to make it enormously successful. The fact that right wing broadcasters control most of the powerful radio stations in the country makes AAR’s achievements almost miraculous. AAR is now in almost ninety cities. Unfortunately about 25 of these are Clear Channel under-performing stations and CC refuses to invest any promotional money for their local communities.

That is why my wife Anita and I have founded our own radio acquisition company called Nova M Radio, Inc. You can read about us at http:// www.novamradio.com. We saved AAR in Phoenix with tremendous grass roots support from the community after a right wing Christian Radio Company bought the station and kicked AAR off the air. And that station was doing very well because the station manager did a great job of promoting the content. But, he had a budget to work with and an owner that wanted to make the station successful. He made it so successful that he got a big offer to buy the station that he could not refuse.

Nova M Radio has also started a Little Rock affiliate and we are in negotiations with stations in 6 other cities. We also have signed John Zogby to a 1-hour show called “The Pulse of the Nation” that we plan to syndicate to AAR and other radio and TV affiliates. This show will give the nation information about what the American people think about issues using Zogby’s infrastructure and scientific polling methods. We are also working with Bob Parry to start working on investigative journalism that can be exclusive to AAR and other talk radio stations.

But as I said earlier, it takes money to do these things and AAR does not have enough in its budget to take advantage of all of its opportunities and survive. There is a genuine interest by liberals to support liberal talk radio in general and AAR in particular. But, like so many people who complain about things, the complainers rarely do anything. So my advice to all the people who complain about AAR that you should all think about what talk radio was like before AAR. And you should take some action to convince rich liberals, high-level Democrats, and others who genuinely care about the future of media in this country to start reaching out to projects like AAR.

There are so many non-profit organizations and think tanks supported by rich liberals that a small percentage of the money used to support those organizations would make AAR and liberal talk radio a major success. And all this bantering from the left about what AAR is not doing feeds right into the right wing propaganda about how liberals have no real audience. The right wing controls most of the good radio stations and they have focused almost all of their money in media, something many rich liberals ignore. What most of these people are good at is criticizing their own. I suggest that anyone who wants to make a major investment in AAR or Nova M Radio would have a lot to say about improving the business model for liberal talk radio.

So what is holding them back? Do they want to wait until freedom of the press is completely destroyed? Or do they think that the Internet blogs and the think tanks can reach mainstream America in large numbers. No, we all have to work together to cross-pollinate the message throughout the country. I always have wondered why elite liberals have had such a difficult time working as team players. The reason stems from the human qualities that we all have and the egos that influential people have in their belief system. A financially successful person tends to believe that he has a monopoly on ideas. The constituency for liberals is generally the less fortunate and the shrinking middle class. The liberal elites are too busy arguing about whose idea is better to be truly visionary.

Divisions between the left had very disastrous effects in history. All one has to do is review the hostility between the left in Germany in the early 1930s to appreciate that the right wing wins when the left is divided. And I think it is time to set egos aside and go after the real enemy to freedom of the press in this country. And the enemy is not AAR. The fact is that we need to rally around AAR and Nova M Radio with money and grass roots support. The failure of liberal talk radio would be a disaster to our cause and feed the right wing propaganda machine.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheldon-drobny/air-america-radio-aar-_b_24812.html



(Biographical info on Sheldon Drobny - Sheldon Drobny was the co-founder of Air America Radio. He is also the Chairman and Managing Director of Paradigm Group II, a venture capital firm specializing in socially responsible businesses. He has been the major force in developing Paradigm to the status it has achieved today. Mr. Drobny, a Certified Public Accountant and winner of the Elijah Watts Sells award for outstanding performance on the Uniform CPA Exam has practiced public accounting for over 30 years. ... )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sheldon is a great fellow.
And a friend of mine, I'm proud to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He sounds great. It makes me want to wring the neck of many of
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 01:54 PM by Pirate Smile
the outspoken rich liberals who aren't helping but are out bitching. Put your friggin money where you mouth is!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juffo Wup Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. This quote says it all
"It is the fact that that most of the wealthy liberals will not support it financially that prevents AAR from doing many of the things that would make it very successful."

We have Scaife on the right who will fund ANYTHING. Yet, for some reason on the left, the wealthy libearls make lots and lots of noise, but refuse to open up their wallets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow.. John Zogby will his own show on AAR soon?
"The Pulse of the Nation"

Sounds interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. "venture fund"
Is there some fund we can all invest in? I know most venture funds like this are limited to large investments, but maybe if there was something that included smaller, $500 investors. Could there be enough of us little people to make up for the lack of a Scaife?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The securities laws make that difficult.
Because long ago so many people were fleeced of their life savings by people seeing such small investments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah I know
But it still seems like there should be something, some kind of mutual fund for progressive media or something?? I obviously don't know how these things get started. Probably would require the same wealthy liberals to step up to the plate, and they won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, write Sheldon and ask him.
I'm betting he'd know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's an interesting thought..
But we'd sure need to know for a fact the money was going into the right hands..

Here in Anchorage when AAR came (we were the 11th city to get AAR out of the 100's that now have it!!).. :)

And boy did we luck out !!! The station started by two very progressive brothers on a shoe-string budget, not knowing how long they'd be on the air.

Within the first 6 or so months of them being on the air, the IBEW (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers) bought the station, put the two brothers (and many more locals to work) and they just built them a beautiful studio downtown!

In addition to AAR, Ed Schultz & Stephanie Miller, we have two local progressive shows with more on the way! The station here is a major HIT!

Here we were able to do it with a very wealthy union stepping in.. Imagine (like they said, if a wealthy liberal would step up to the bat) what they could do!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wow, very cool
A union bought a radio station, well I'll be. I wouldn't have thought that was legal, seems kind of like a political party buying a media outlet. Glad for you guys though!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. what does "successful" mean for AAR...?
Edited on Tue Jul-11-06 02:14 PM by mike_c
This is an interesting commentary, but it leaves out some essential information, IMO. Most notably, the author laments that AAR's "success" is effectively blocked by lack of investment but without giving any notion what form its success might take if investment was forthcoming.

Does success mean financial success, i.e. that AAR will begin to generate a large revenue stream for its investors, presumably through syndication and advertising sales? In that respect AAR's success would differ little from, say, Clear Channel's success if that is the eventual intent. Does success mean longevity and scope, i.e. that AAR will be able to hold onto significant market all over the country? Arguably, that would be part of any success, but without discussing any real services provided as part of that widespread dissemination it's hard to accept that "bigness" alone constitutes "success." Might success mean AAR playing a significant role in information distribution? If that's the case, one needs to ask what sort of information it intends to distribute. As the author himself points out, the talk format is not news-- let's be honest, it's entertainment at best and propaganda at worst. Journalism that serves a specific agenda is always suspect, no matter what side of the agenda you stand on, or how much you might agree with the perspective being used to enforce the bias.

Personally, I don't like the talk radio format very much, so I'm not rooting for AAR very strongly. I'd rather see investment in real journalism instead of shrill indignation, whether from the left or the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC