|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
UDenver20 (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:57 AM Original message |
Ok... convince me that Lamont can win a 3-way race.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celica Toyota (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. Lieberman is going to lose. Lamont's the only choice to beat Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Interesting you'd say that from California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
62. What evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:31 PM Response to Reply #62 |
90. He's been hearing the DLC talking points probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. If Lamont wins the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UDenver20 (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
23. GOP trails behind both Lamont and Lieberman in a 3-way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:20 AM Response to Reply #23 |
81. It would seem that the question of which party he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
35. I don't think he's saying it'd be Lamont's fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
3. the polls are a slice of now, not then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davhill (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Most Republicans will support Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UDenver20 (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. I guess one should consider the # of GOP Voters who are also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. They won't have much trouble voting Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Finder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
5. I doubt Lamont will win the primary...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
6. There is no evidence a Republican would win so how do we lose control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynzM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Because IF Lieberman were to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Actually, He Could Do a Jim Jeffords |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. And that's what he said he'd do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. if lieberman votes for a republican as majority leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. No. He said he would caucus with the Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Independent Senator Jim Jeffords joined with the Democrats on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UDenver20 (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. First, we don't have it yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #26 |
85. Uh, Jeffords won't be involved with this. It'll be Bernie Sanders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. I can't believe you have to ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. FUCK THE FUCKING POLLS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. Uhm, no, he won't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
91. Stop fooling yourself, Lamont is going to destroy Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
69. Uhh.... Lamont is ahead in the polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
92. I think he's upset and WANTS Lamont to lose.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. HELL no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:46 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. Sorry boolean, I meant to reply to Vash the Stampede above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. If Lamont wins the primary, the only way he loses a 3-way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
11. easy lead in a 3-way? nope ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. If Lieberman loses, his support will plunge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. i agree ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:33 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Here is the sister poll to that one - about the Lieberman/Lamont Primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
19. The last poll has them *tied* in a 3-way, at 40% each for Ned and Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
22. As long as tit's not the republican I'll be happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
77. Lynne, there's no way CT's next senator will be a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
25. And that would be a very GOP thing for Joe to do, wouldn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walkon (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
27. Look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
28. Here's how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
71. God, I hope you're right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
29. Cuz Joementum will lose momentum when he looses the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
30. Or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. The thing is, unless the GOP switches candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
37. I doubt he can.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. 6 Months ago, yes. Two months ago Lieberman was ahead by a landslide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. So instead of targeting actual Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. So you're suggesting that where we have Democratic incumbents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I'm suggesting that the far left has demonstrated again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Are ACTUAL Republicans running in any Democratic primaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. They're sure as shit running for re-election in November |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. It's still primary season. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Not everywhere... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. So what's a horseshit question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
73. Which candidate in Ct. are you voting for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Another brainiac heard from....(snicker) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #73 |
119. He's equating members of the Green party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:31 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Thanks, I realized that, but it makes" no nevermind" to me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. So why aren't you mad at Johnson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Why would I be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. cause Johnson is CONSERVATIVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #64 |
76. Not even close to true, darboy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 06:52 AM Response to Reply #76 |
80. why aren't you upset about Lieberman running as an Indy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #80 |
102. Deleted message |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 05:55 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. well he WAS going to give it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 07:11 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:34 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. when its a CONSERVATIVE, then you say "so what" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Deleted message |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:42 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. I am saying substantive things and you are making ad hominem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. No, you're asking half-assed leading questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. no, you're ducking the question becuase it puts you in an untenable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Pout louder, darboy....maybe you'll convince yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. any split vote is SQUARELY on the shoulders of Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Yeah, surrrrrrrrre.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. I accept your admission of defeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Deleted message |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. oh man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #106 |
113. What you call "silly posturing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #113 |
117. What you call "logic" is more like pathology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UDenver20 (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:36 AM Response to Reply #56 |
84. because she's a NUT-JOB....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 09:20 PM Response to Reply #42 |
118. Are you stating that anyone who supports Ned Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. This one is not all about the far left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. It sure as shit is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Connecticut voters are just not that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. The fact remains |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. That is a flat out lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. No, it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. I'm not pretending that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. In fact, Connecticut voters shun extremism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:14 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. You're trying to reason with a DLCer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:21 PM Response to Reply #67 |
86. Or perhaps an RNC-er....EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. But anybody who opposes Mr. Benchley's chosen favourites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. It still is one of the safest seats the Democrats have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Chirp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
94. The far left hates democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-04-06 01:51 AM Response to Reply #94 |
123. "hate Democrats" is Benchley Auto-Smear#4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-04-06 01:45 AM Response to Reply #37 |
122. We've PROVEN that opposing Lieberman ISN'T hating Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-01-06 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
47. Real World Events (RWE) will decide Lamont's fate next week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. Trust me, plenty of folks in CT still care about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:33 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. Schlessinger will be replaced if Lamont wins, the GOP will not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. As disgusted as I am with Lieberman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:16 PM Response to Reply #47 |
68. I don't think Joe is going to be too tough of a GOP candidate. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
60. Unlees you live in CT, what *you* think doesn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
66. All the Republicans are lining up behind Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GAPeace (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-02-06 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
74. We will look stupid for exercising Democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
78. Tom DeLay endorsed Lieberman on Fox News today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkDevin (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Holy crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #78 |
87. Bwahaha! Thanks, MF. Hannity, Tweety, etc..etc... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
82. if the new poll numbers for Lamont are accurate, he wins 3-way easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
83. You are WRONG that Joe wins as an indy in all the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. You are absolutely correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. I agree skipos - I believe the polls cited in a 3 way are a bit old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
96. Lamont will win if Lieberman decides to endorse & back the Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Oh, I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. I would rather Lieberman follow Howard Dean's gracious example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. I agree that that is what he SHOULD do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 01:34 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. All the more reason to keep putting the notion out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
101. I live in Virginia, and "met" Lamont on Colbert..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-03-06 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
121. The republican guy (Schlechinger) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC