Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America is not a democracy and it never has been

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:11 PM
Original message
America is not a democracy and it never has been
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 09:12 PM by MN Against Bush
When America was founded only white-male-property owners were allowed to vote.

It took nearly a century and a half before women were given the right to vote, and while blacks were granted the constitutional right to vote shortly after the Civil War they were not able to effectively exercise that right until the mid 60's when the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were passed.

We are limited to a two party system, and lets face it unless you coddle the corporate donors you barely even have the option to run for any major office. The two parties generally limit the options to the establishment favorites, and the system is set up to ensure that the two party rule is never seriously challenged.

We have an electoral college system that ensures that some peoples votes count more than others, and we have political gerrymandering that artificially protects incumbents and takes power away from voters. We have a system in which a candidate can often win without a majority of the votes, and they still are able to grab all the power.

Then there are the shall we say, interesting methods of counting the votes. We leave our elections to faith. We are not given a chance to review the election results, in fact on many electronic machines there is not even a way to review them. Even when there is a paper trail however it is extremely difficult to get a recount, even when the results are highly suspect.

Now don't get me wrong I love my country, although my government is legitimized mainly through myth. George Bush never won an election, and there was never a time when our elections were actually conducted fairly.

Yet despite the fact that our nation has never been a democracy the people have been able to win some great victories. Civil Rights were not gained at the ballot box they were obtained in the streets. Yes voting is important, but participating is even more important. They can find ways to ensure your votes are not counted, but they can not silence your voice. Yet. Let us fight for a democracy we never had before it is too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope it's a Republic or
as some perfer a Representive Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. just like the People's Republic of China!
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 10:26 PM by flaminbats
just imagine..if Democrats lose the next election, we might see a financial merger of our two parties. After all, cheap labor and corporate profits are part of a global economy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Republic means only "no king"
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 10:25 PM by tocqueville
then a republic can be a democracy, a dictatorship or a theocracy

Democracy is a form of government. A democracy can be a monarchy or a republic, but not a theocracy or a dictatorship. Then the forms of applying democracy can differ from democracy to democracy, presidential system, parliament system, even direct democracy (referendum based).

people mix often the two concepts. Today's USA is a republic with a failing democracy due mostly to a too strong presidential power and inherent flaws in its representative and judiciary system. Cheating at elections is a sign that the democracy is gliding towards dictatorship. The biased media and the religious influence are bad signs too. But it isn't still a dictatorship. Or else DU wouldn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. SAD BUT TRUE....
Yes your are correct....well said!
Lets Take Back Our Country!:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Interesting point about democracy in America being transfigured.
Edited on Thu Aug-03-06 05:53 AM by no_hypocrisy
Democracy ideally started out and was maintained as a constitutional democracy versus a majoritarian democracy. In a majoritarian democracy, the laws are passed according to a simple majority of the people through their representatives -- 51% or higher, no matter what. In a constitutional democracy, it seems like a majoritarian democracy until the laws impinge on the fundamental rights and/or civil rights of a minority within the population; then the constitution protects them from the will of the majority (e.g., otherwise there would be wholesale legal discrimination based on race, religion, ethnic background, national origin, gender, etc.)

What is interesting here is the incremental change from constitutional democracy to the appearance of majority democracy, but really, it's a total bypass of rights altogether. Congress is not passing laws according to the will or needs of their constituents, but rather its benefactors (lobbyists, contributors), thus making our system more of an oligarchy, but claiming otherwise. The majority of voters have not called them on it -- yet, if ever. Congress is going through the motions of a democracy. And the aider and abettor of this destruction are the courts that haven't ruled that the system has broken down, and that Congress is not "by the People, of the People."

And I'm starting to wonder if it ever was, with the exception of strong leadership in the White House in the past who called Congress on its charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanus Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Republic means "People's Thing"
Res Publica
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Specifically, the United States of America is a constitutional republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. just like the People's Republic of China!!
:wow: of course the CCP gets most of its power from the Chinese constitution, just like the Electoral College gets the power to elect our Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. The trouble is
those that tout representation start actuating and defining it toward LACK of popular representation, some privileged elite who very obviously know better than the masses. it is not technique but inequality and superiority that starts defining "Republic" very quickly to what Rome became. the republic as such lost itself and became a shadow mockery.

Well, what of our Republic from that same party the GOP whose Congress is mocked, subverted, ignored and used by its own president not even as a plaything but as something of zero consequence. they have a shadow "government" too and Lord knows under what theory that functions.

I think every term and idea is abused by the lie that covers everything. One cannot debate republic and democracy anymore than one could trust them to "reform" the Constitution. it is hard to dignify ideas in a debate with liars seeking venal personal advantage only. The forefathers certainly had much less dishonesty but we cannot debate them in absentia post mortem. They too were split in a more civilized way unified against royal tyranny and so much self selected personal privilege. they favored democracy as a balance against the elite and the leading citizens as a control against the mob. The French Revolution seemed to confirm their point and they too produced a Republic that lead to Empire in short order. For their times they chose balance.

In our times the GOP chooses elite privilege AND mob bullying to create that sort of Republic that degrades and degrades faster for the anachronism of its lie. And people die and the state perishes as a whole long after its brain and soul have become loot encrusted mush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're absolutely right
Voting is about voting for one of two multimillionaires that control the media and campaigns, mostly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was never meant to be a pure Democracy...
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 09:37 PM by SaveElmer
Were meant to be Republic, or representative Democracy...

However, in fact suffrage has been widened consistently, though slowly since the founding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electable Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. no taxation without representation
I say no taxation without representation.. Let felons and long
term residents who pay taxes have a guaranteed vote. Even
illegal immigrants who pay taxes are just as entitled to vote
as natural born citizens IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. actually, i've come to believe that...
...a more appropriate slogan would be: "No representation without taxation". People who have taxable incomes, yet pay no taxes due to the special privileges state legislatures and Congress give them, should not be allowed to vote, as they do not contribute to the common good. Similarly, the largest corporations who get away with paying no corporate income tax should be denied the right to contribute to political campaigns for the same reason. Think of it as turning "pay to play" into "won't pay? can't play."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Hi Electable!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a two party system for one reason....
We have a winner take all election process....

It would naturally gravitate toward two parties in order to maintain competative balance...

Several smaller parties only detract from which ever main party has the weaker coalition building skills...

That or the fact there are two many peole out there who confuse the American style of democracy with the western European style of democracy....

Over there, coming close gets you a seat or two in the government...

Over here, coming close gets you zilch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and that two party winner take all system is undemocratic
We need instant runnoff voting and a congress that truly represents the interests of Americans. Not these gerrymandered districts, with candidates that can only run because they can raise money from the wealthy elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. there is no reason why we couldnt have a multiparty system in congress.
the presidency is obviously winner take all but the congress could be constructed of coalitions just as the parlimentary system is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. But it can't.....
Not while the districts are winner take all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I tend to agree... But for the time being....
You gotta play by the rules as they was written....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I never suggested otherwise, I am just pointing out it is not democracy
I am saying we need to raise our voice and call for change rather than pretending our system is democratic when it really is not.

I believe democracy is possible, but in order to obtain it we all need to recognize we do not have it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. The Founders founded a republic.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Yes, the founders distrusted direct democracy, as in 5th century Greece
but what evolved was representative democracy. I find it interesting that rightwingers who loudly proclaim that the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy are OK with the referendum process in western states, which of course is closer to direct democracy. They think the Founders would also be OK with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. The Ballot initative, what they call a referendum here in Ohio...
Is the same....

One of the reason laws originating and perculating through the system is that there is compromise and discussion...

On the ballot, it's all take it or leave it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Absolutely. Runoff voting would change everything and that
can only be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. It's still a zero sum situation...
Look shared districts will never take place in this country...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Excellent points all. The problem comes from not enough people
seeing it as a problem to change it. Maybe that's what *'s purpose is, to show up the severe deficiencies of our deeply flawed system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Gee, we promote democracy while we ourselves are something else
Is that irony or way of destabilizing our "rivals".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I agree with Mr. Franklin on Democracy.
Check the sig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. For 200 years
Edited on Thu Aug-03-06 12:52 PM by bvar22
the USA moved steadily TOWARD an enlightened Social Democracy.
This "movement toward" was the source of HOPE and INSPIRATION.

During the Reagan years, this process was reversed, and the USA is now accelerating toward Fascism. Even the interlude of a Democratic administration in the 90's did nothing to stop this slide.


The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanus Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Democracy means rule by the demos
Edited on Thu Aug-03-06 01:02 PM by ryanus
which historically has only included some people, whoever is part of the demos. Not everyone in ancient Athens was a citizen or could vote. Only males, of a certain age, not ostracized, who lived in the area, who were not slaves, etc. So while it is a worthy effort to make sure the number of voting participants is as wide as possible, I wouldn't say that US is not nor has not been a democracy. I think it is an issue of where we really are honoring the democracy that we claim to have. Or rather, we are expanding who is part of the demos.

If democracy meant everyone can vote, then children would have to be included. Voting age used to be 21, now it's 18.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daydreamer Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. We all live under dictators. Any one who has a boss has a dictator
over him. I don't get your head chopped off, but you will lose your livelihood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I favor a Parliamentary form of Govt.
Multi-party Parliamentary systems seem more democratic.

America seems to be a Plutocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. pure democracy is impossible
excluding citizenship in our republican democracy is the biggest error we have been fixing ever since the founding. The struggle continues...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC