Why do DUers eviscerate Lieberman (and Clinton) but embrace Ford?

of TN who is as DINO as one can be?

From TIME

The Congressman who is running to replace retiring Bill Frist as Senator from Tennessee has voted to outlaw gay marriage and to repeal the estate tax, and wants to amend the Constitution to ban flag burning. He supports getting rid of the handgun ban in the nation's capital and says the Ten Commandments should be posted in courtrooms around his state. He favors school prayer, argues that more troops should have been sent to Iraq and wants to seal the border with Mexico.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1223381,00.html

And, no doubt, he would have voted for both Roberts and Alito.

Next to him, Lieberman and Clinton are in the far left.

Do we really need someone like him in the Senate? I'd rather have a Republican. At least we will save future angst.

Add Casey to the mix and we might as well be called Republican Light.

Lieberman was a conservative dem from a liberal state. these two are conservative dems from conservative states. run lihberal dem in those states and I'll support her, but any dem is better than any of the repubs out there. particularly frist and santorum!

Withdraw from Iraq? he will vote NO

Repeal estate tax? he will vote YES

Constitutional amendments to ban flag burning and gay marriage? he will vote YES

Separation of church and state? he will vote NO

Ban on guns in D.C. (not to mention assault weapons)? he will vote NO

What subject will he possibly vote with the Democrats?

they will set the agenda, not the repukes. That is a VERY big deal. Ford will vote to make a dem Majority Leader. If he makes it, he'll be a junior dem Senator, and even if his votes suck, it's better than having the repukes in the majority.

...and personality.

Any other questions?

he was savaged here, too, and rightly so.

If you have DINOs who will not vote with the Democrats on: Constitutional bans of flag burning and gay marriage; repeal of estate tax; separation of church and state; withdrawing from Iraq - what good will it be to have him?

OK, this is TN decision, but what good will it be for the other Democrats to embrace him?

How can he possibly improve our position. Name one subject, please.

If you don't understand how that can help us, you shouldn't be posting on a political forum. You should instead be reading a politics 101 text book.

I have news for you mister big shot: most people come here to ask questions, to learn and to express opinions. Will you put the same hurdle in front of voters?

Oh, I forgot, we used to have similar requirements but we banned them some 40 years ago. Sorry you lost. (not)

But if you don't know the basics of politics, it's probably not a good idea to spout off at the mouth like you do, and like you have. But hey, that's your choice.

Senator Kennedy as Chairman of Health, Education and Labor. Isn't that enough for you?

but at some point issues are brought in front of the whole Senate, with Cheney, at least for two more years, as the tie breaking vote. Will Ford vote with the Democrats on the issues raised above, or with the Republican? And we already know that there are several other Democratic senators, again from Red States, who vote with Republicans so there goes your majority.

Again, it is up to the TN voters, just as Lieberman was up to CT's, but I find it strange with so much attack on Zell Miller - from a red state, too - and on Lieberman and Clinton, that there is not even a lament about Ford. What, is he "the crazy aunt in the attic" that no one is talking about?

It shifts the entire debate on every single issue over to the left. What part about this don't you understand?

Look, if the dems take the Senate, Cheney doesn't have a tie breaking vote. That's only if it's fifty/fifty.

The Democrats had the majority in 1991, but Dan Quayle was on hand to break the tie vote - if needed - during the Thomas confirmation. As it happened, his vote was not needed, as 11 Democrats voted YES for a final 52 to 48 vote. (One Republican, Packwood, voted NO)

I think that I get it alright.

and been shot down when i say anything about ford. i guess some think it`s not good to criticize the democrats

Lieberman and Clinton and others who do not want an immediate withdrawal from Iraq - but who are in step with other Democratic principles - but to embrace Ford. Or is him being black a factor?

Yes, all politics is local. It was up to CT voters to decide about Lieberman, up to TN voters about Ford, up to NY voters to vote for Clinton.

But clearly this concept was put in the wayside on these pages when it came for the first two, so why not Ford?

I haven't been following this race. Maybe I should be.

Just where does this guy differ from Bush? He makes Lieberman look lika a, ummm... liberal!

PS - I LOVED the link in the article that shows how much Ford is a man "of the people".

NOT!!

http://www.fancyford.com/

Disgusting. He's the candidate and control of the Senate depends on him winning. Even George Bush has brains enough to know that.

He's a much of a DLC shill-sellout as either of them. He's a Corporatist just like them, and he's as invested in the same DINO things as they are. Red state, blue state... doesn't matter to me. A DINO is a DINO is a DINO and never will any of them get my support for ANYTHING.

TC

He may not be an ultra liberal and conservative on some issues, but Harold is smart, well spoken, and someone we will need coming out of TN. I am sick of ignorant, Bush Democrats coming from this state.

hard for some of us to admit? :shrug:

I am not on board with that concept anymore. I used to try to excuse it. But I don't anymore.

vote for Lincoln Davis.

Do you know how many times I've written or e-mailed Davis only to see him vote with Repukes?

But he's the only game in town and the idiots down here don't want anyone not "Christian" enough. They will watch their kids starve and their soldiers die and lose their jobs, homes, everything as long as gays can't marry. that and abortion are THE ONLY issues to a great many SOutherners. Stupid? Hell yes, but I'm a lifelong dem who also voted for Zell way back when.

And when I did, also casting a vote for Clinton, it did make a difference.

Ford is running some snazzy, very different ads than anyone else. Has one talking about raising soybeans for energy in TN, showing Bush kissing and holding hands with the Saudis.

He's not playing the vaslues card, but the local economy/working man/fed-up-with-Bush card.

And if he doesn't change once in the Senate, I'll kick his ass.

And look at it this way, compared to Frist he's Michael Moore.

just as I tried with the PA voters when they voted for anti-abortion Casey (you will not find me using the misleading term pro-life, and I wish that other DUers not.. was trained at NARAL back in 1990).

As many say here - this is local decision.

But Lieberman and Clinton are not viewed as local - as you can see from the ream of words on these pages. So I just wonder.

on edit: about Zell, I thought that his nomination of Clinton in the 1992 Convention was masterful. Did not follow him much until another convention, that of 2004..

On DU!!!

So yes, lets keep Ford from winning in Tennessee (btw the Primary is past), and make sure someone 4 times worse gets in there...

I was for Kurita, but Ford won and it's time to rally around him just the way it's time to rally around Lamont. I don't understand these people who bash our candidates into the dirt and then blame them when they lose.

Oh, I know, no one.

you can't replace someone with no one, and you can't move someone to the left with a blank.

Remember, this is Tennessee. If this state voted for its own in 2000, Gore would be President. You have to look at the state when making these assessments. Still, I understand the dilemma, but we don't need ass-kissing from any democrat, and Lieberman is in a class of his own.

but no one with enough clout to get airtime.

i hate to say it, but I held my nose as i voted for Ford and Lincoln. they are the lesser of the evils.

You have to remember, many of the whites in the South are descendants of convicts and outcasts who were sent to the States as punishment. They carried with them that English/Scottish/Irish superstition, they put very little value in education ( the most prestigious Southern schools were started by Confederates if that tells you anything) and they think they are really supporting JESUS hisself when they vote against gays and abortion.

They don't see the moral problem with blowing up dark people for oil, they ridicule each other for getting any sort of education. How the hell else to you get some tool like Frist in the Senate?

You get him because most Southerners are superstitious and loyal to their ridiculous ideas about "Jeebus." They'll lose EVERYTHING if they think their preacher will pat them on the head. It's sheer ignorance, but they are proud and cannot see how they are shooting themselves in the foot by voting for tools of the Corporations. Honestly, they just don't think much deeper than 'what diddy tole me." It's sad, but the only Dem who can win here is the one who can play on their fears and ignorance.

I'd love to wake them all up and say GEORGE BUSH DOESN"T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOU!!!! but as long as he's against abortion and against gay marriage, they just don't seem to care.

Very sad, but that's reality.

As proven by his defeat in the primary, and Lamont's upcoming victory in the general. If you think we can do better than Ford in TN, then I highly suggest you go down there and get to work. Most here have written Tennessee off as too conservative to get anything better than a DINO from. Still better than a republican though, at least a DINO counts toward a Democratic majority. Pragmatism must guide your rage to achievable ends, otherwise nothing good will come of it.

But I've learned too much about him since then. I actually don't know if I have it in me to cast a vote for the sonofabitch. I'd just as soon kick him in the shins for being a fuckwit.

In a red state, it's necessary to get any Democratt in that we can. Someone like John Kerry could not win in Tennessee, but if we can get someone in with a D after his name, that may give the Dems a majority in the senate. It's all about the numbers. Ford may be an odious choice, but he does count as a democrat.

And has much less to do with the DLC than Blue Dog conservative Democrats. One of these days the light bulb will go on with DUers I suppose.

I have never had anything good to say about Ford's politics. Little Bushass kisser

OK, that's his plusses...

There are some great "real" Democrats out there in Tennessee, like Phil Bresden....

Just like there are some great Democrats out there in Alabama, like Jim Folsom, Jr., Susan Parker, and the DLC-coached Roger Bedford...