|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 07:08 PM Original message |
Some honest questions for people who support Lieberman's independent run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. ex-actly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grok (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Excellent points all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. "We have succeed in making him an enemy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. I think it is the view of the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
66. Bravo!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
48. He made himself the enemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. You will be endorsing Lamont now, though, since the primary occurred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
87. No. Making him an "Independent." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
111. So why didn't us nut-job lefties go after even more conservative Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #111 |
117. Deleted sub-thread |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
140. Lieberman lost and cannot be advocated for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Deleted message |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. You are now in violation of DU policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. I had to sign a friggin' loyalty oath just to sit on a committee and a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. My postie/thread.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I must ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. It isn't just the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. As much as you'd like to blame Lieberman for everything that's gone wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. some responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 07:46 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Don't bother with reasoning here, DSC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. I get so tired of the cloture/vote issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
138. Best Post Ever.....thnaks dsc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why are people so certain that independants are going to vote for him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Your argument is flawed in two respects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Do you have statistics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Do you have google? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Your survey USA Poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. 600 is enough to be considered a random sample |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
76. The random sample is not of "reasonable size" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 11:21 PM Response to Reply #76 |
150. They use stratified random samples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
51. If you're supporting Lieberman against Lamont, you're violating DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
141. And the loser got more votes from Republicans than Dems every election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
45. Flawed logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
160. Rasmussin 46-41% for Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
14. All good points... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
16. Because The Left Is Evil, and The Right Is Good. Haven't you heard? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. Why should I, in the name of party unity, support..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. because he won the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yet you claim Lieberman's decision negates that duty.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Deleted message |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I'm really not aware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. You have over 1000 posts on DU. Are you blind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. and Lanny Davis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
44. The sheer hypocrisy of some of the Lamont posts is astounding.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
35. Deleted message |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
42. how traitorous! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
52. So what will you now be doing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:41 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. I'll be giving Lamont the same cheerful rousing support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
95. Ned Lamont AINT't unknown anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:42 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. Ned Lamont never was an "Unknown" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
143. Yep, yet another lie from benchley the fringie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #58 |
119. The DLC is not elected and has never been elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #119 |
132. LOL! Not even close to true.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #132 |
198. LOL! not even close to sane! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
71. There is just so much hypocrisy in what you just said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Theres a difference between a strongly held opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:15 PM Response to Reply #71 |
81. No hypocrisy here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. Lieberman should be thinking of his legacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #81 |
97. Liebermans' trying to steal a seat that's Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:42 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. Which seat was that, Pepe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. Lamont wasn't to blame for the caricature, and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:51 PM Original message |
Does DU allow that type of smear campaign against the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
169. Unfortunately, that is the will of Skinner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
182. Apparently yes, if your avatar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
179. He ain't a Democrat anymore Benchley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 01:44 AM Response to Reply #20 |
190. Wait a minute...YOU are complaining about what OTHER PEOPLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-10-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Hey Benchley... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 07:54 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Actually MrBenchley poses a very valid question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 05:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
47. Take a look around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
94. The ONLY reason the seat isn't safe for Dems is Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:38 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. 100% correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:46 PM Response to Reply #94 |
105. You mean the Democrat who held the seat, Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. DEMOCRATS in CT decided that they wanted different representation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:53 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Lamont was dredged out of obscurity by the left wing blogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #114 |
124. So vote for Lieberman if you want to see Lamont (and Democrats) lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:13 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Notice that there was no answer to your question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. Yes, I noticed. I didn't expect anything different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. There is hope for the future then! Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #128 |
135. I don't expect anything but hypocrisy out of Lamont backers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #135 |
153. Again, you have my question about what the "far left" really is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:27 PM Response to Reply #128 |
144. So, are the mods going to weaken the rules because it's lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 12:45 AM Response to Reply #144 |
154. They're allegedly applying the old "Green" rule to Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. What is the old green rule? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #124 |
134. I wonder how many folks in Connecticut will take you up on that offer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 12:47 AM Response to Reply #134 |
155. Democrats in Connecticut have spoken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #155 |
156. And 48% didn't want Lamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 08:11 PM Response to Reply #156 |
165. ...and 52% did. Where I come from, we call that a win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 08:13 PM Response to Reply #165 |
167. As if there is a single DUer out there with a WORSE track record on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 08:19 PM Response to Reply #167 |
168. That thought DID cross my mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 02:46 AM Response to Reply #105 |
192. There was no good reason to let Lieberman go unchallenged... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. Not being in Connecticut, I don't have to climb on that pony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. Maybe it should be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:34 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I like it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:43 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Wow I didn't realize this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:49 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. The Reverend Al has a very quick wit and a sharp tongue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 02:48 AM Response to Reply #67 |
193. Given that Sharpton got nowhere in 2004, what difference did it make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #65 |
122. He's a mouth, not a real politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #122 |
158. He should really stick to speechmaking and writing, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #64 |
78. How about Senator Lieberman's cozying up to Sean Hannity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. You sound like the "What about Clinton?" right wingers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
200. Never thought I'd say this, but THANK YOU, Save Elmer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 07:49 AM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Because he's the party's nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
59. But the claim was that there is no such duty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 02:50 AM Response to Reply #59 |
194. You can't get away with implying that Lamont's clear victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. It won't matter for much longer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Geeze, that's the sort of rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #60 |
159. What rhetoric? She pointed out simple facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
54. The primary settled the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:44 AM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Deleted message |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 10:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
56. Because I've had to vote for the likes of Dianne Feinstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:40 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #57 |
72. Deleted message |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
142. You don't have to. You can even silently support loser lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
28. If people are supporting Lieberman they shouldn't be doing it here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
31. Which is why Senate Democarats need to take the gloves off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Weren't you a Lieberman supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I was and I am now supporting the Democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 12:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Interesting, then why aren't you railing at Lieberman for disrupting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
53. Thank you Freddie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 09:46 PM Response to Reply #31 |
199. Thanks again Freddie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. Why are you setting up a DU speed trap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 03:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. actually they are allowed to support Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-11-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. You cannot support J. Lieberman in any way shape or form on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 11:40 PM Response to Reply #55 |
151. actually in a post about this race in GD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
77. No, you actually can't advocate support for him in any way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
93. Ummm...no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
96. Deleted message |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #39 |
201. It was probably an attempt at dialogue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
63. 4) If it's perfectly acceptable to promote Indy candidates over Dems, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:06 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. I will say the words "Bernie Sanders" and you will awaken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. if that's wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #69 |
85. Deleted message |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. There isn't one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:18 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. Because we made a deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:26 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Yeah? When was this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. He first won office in 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. So in other words, the "deal" is your fantasy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Fine I will provide your link and I would like an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. And Schumer is the entire party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 04:22 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. It wasn't just Schumer as the link you demanded made clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. And so he got committee assignments based on seniority.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:38 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. seniority based on his years as a Democratic senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #99 |
107. Bernie's an INDEPENDENT, Pepe.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
V. Kid (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:40 PM Response to Reply #107 |
146. Not true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #107 |
149. wow, you know nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #107 |
163. Bernie wasn't ever a registered Dem and there was no registered Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cassandra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #107 |
180. Lieberman is not running under the banner of the Independent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #92 |
147. It is senority with in the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 10:31 PM Response to Reply #90 |
145. Schumer didn't endorse loser lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:44 PM Response to Reply #86 |
103. You would have to admit that no Dem could've beaten Bernie, and you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:47 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. That poster thought Bernie Sander only presided over a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #103 |
112. You mean Bernie polls like Lieberman used to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #112 |
118. Bernie has always polled BETTER than Lieberman, ThugLife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:20 PM Response to Reply #118 |
130. Deleted sub-thread |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #118 |
133. Some background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #103 |
116. Again, given the poster's lack of knowledge of Vt politics, why bother? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #116 |
121. For the sake of those just tuning in, mainly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #121 |
136. Deleted sub-thread |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #86 |
189. Dream on, Benclhley. Facts are already confirmed here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:41 PM Response to Reply #79 |
100. Vermont's a dead issue. You have no cause to beat that horse anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:45 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. That dog won't hunt. Bernie Sanders isn't running against a DEMOCRAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. Deleted message |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. Look, we've proven and proven and proven that supporting Bernie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #113 |
137. You've pouted and pouted when hypocrisy is pointed out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #137 |
164. Why are you so determined to see every expression of a point of view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #108 |
115. So it's only the "far left" who take issue with the war in Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. That is what is killing some of the dead enders clinging to Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:06 PM Response to Reply #115 |
123. I think Lamont supporters can fairly call themselves "The New Center". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:13 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. But it's NOT the "new center"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #115 |
131. It's only the far left that put ideological purity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 12:43 AM Response to Reply #131 |
152. Idealogical purity my ass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #152 |
185. Ideological purity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 03:40 PM Response to Reply #185 |
197. Nobody swiftboated Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 11:02 PM Response to Reply #79 |
148. Democrats can give the nomination to whomever they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #79 |
188. HEre's where your facts come wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 12:01 AM Response to Reply #68 |
187. May I point out that Democratic Party has wholeheartedly endorsed Sanders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
70. Deleted message |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
74. Since he cannot be endorsed here now, after losing, is this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 08:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
127. Guess that isn't an issue yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-12-06 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
139. By the way, speaking of honest questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #139 |
161. No, it would be a good idea for Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 04:36 PM Response to Reply #161 |
162. Don't know what the Lamonties are pissing and moaning about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 08:13 PM Response to Reply #162 |
166. Lamont's campaign put out a racist caricature? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:03 PM Response to Reply #166 |
170. Yes they did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #170 |
171. That's either a lie or an honest opinion based in ignorance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:27 PM Response to Reply #171 |
172. No, that's a fact..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:38 PM Response to Reply #172 |
174. Do you dispute that a blog, not the campaign, posted that picture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #174 |
178. Do you really want to pretend Hamsher didn't direct Ned's campaign ads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 08:33 PM Response to Reply #178 |
183. Jane Hamsher is the founder of Firedoglake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #183 |
184. Deleted message |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #171 |
173. I have no problem calling it a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:39 PM Response to Reply #173 |
175. Dude...gotta abide by the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:42 PM Response to Reply #175 |
176. I am abiding by the rules. I never claimed the LIE'S author to be a DUer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
177. Stop pro-Lieberman Kinky Friedman's out-of-Texas $ from Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NativeTexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 11:02 PM Response to Reply #177 |
181. Kinky MAY BE better than what we have HAD......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
186. Here's What Lieberman Pontificated About Nader's Independent Run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 02:09 AM Response to Reply #186 |
191. Nader ran as a spoiler, Lieberman can actually win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 03:14 PM Response to Reply #191 |
195. Karl Rove is running your boy's campaign, dolstein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 10:20 PM Response to Reply #195 |
203. No, Al Sharpton's the "Dem" who lets Republicans run his campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 03:31 PM Response to Reply #191 |
196. Lieberman can most certainly play the spoiler... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #196 |
205. Sorry, but you've got it completely wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 09:56 PM Response to Reply #191 |
202. Still dolstein, you have to admit that Lieberman can't claim to be a Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 10:29 PM Response to Reply #202 |
204. He can't claim to be the Democratic nominee, and he isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 10:32 PM Response to Reply #204 |
206. So you're saying that HolyWarJoe should get to annul the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlienGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-15-06 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
207. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC