Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1-We are DEMONSTRABLY not safer. 2-There is a CIVIL WAR in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 04:52 PM
Original message
1-We are DEMONSTRABLY not safer. 2-There is a CIVIL WAR in Iraq
There is NO good news for the Bushpublicans these days.

They're spinning their fucking asses off and the Three Monkey Media's helping them every step of the way. But the facts are the facts.

17 year old kids HATE OUR FUCKING GUTS and are wiklling to die for that.

There are MORE TERRORISTS rather than fewer.

We COMPLETELY DESTABALIZED the world's most volatile region.

We EMBOLDENED Iran by removing the one counterbalance to their influence.

The former counterbalance to Iranian influence has devolved into civil war (there is NO 'if' in that statement. Its is a fucking FACT). Iran will ultimately hold the most influence over Iraq. We will be defeated, no matter how its spun.

The Busholinis did NOTHING to stop the UK plot. Scotland Yard did it. We may have done a bit at the periphery, but the Brits did it and kept us out of it for the better part of a year for fear of our fucking it up.

Don't trust your lying ears.

The world is in a world of shit and We The People of the Former USofA are drowning in that shit.

Listen to the degree of breathlessness the Busholini apologists exhibit. T It is inversely proportional to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't many of us predicted
that a civil war would break out in Iraq? Those who deny that Iraqis are fighting each other are dreaming. I think it would have been better for peace (and for US interests!) to have left Saddam Hussein in power. It would have been better to just contain him, which is what the policy has been for years. Until * came into power and decided to "spread democracy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now where in the world did you get those 2 pessimistic ideas?
Only kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC