Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Rumsfeld Urges Russia on U.S. Nuke Plan (conventially armed ICBMs)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 06:58 PM
Original message
AP: Rumsfeld Urges Russia on U.S. Nuke Plan (conventially armed ICBMs)
Rumsfeld Urges Russia on U.S. Nuke Plan

By ROBERT BURNS
The Associated Press
Sunday, August 27, 2006; 7:10 PM

FAIRBANKS, Alaska -- Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld made his
strongest public case Sunday for a plan, opposed by some in Congress
and by Russia, to convert some Navy long-range missiles from a nuclear
to a conventional role for potential use against terrorist targets
anywhere in the world.

Opponents of the plan argue that it could create a situation in which a
conventionally armed U.S. Trident missile, launched from a submarine,
would be mistaken for a nuclear launch, thus risking the possibility
of a retaliatory nuclear strike.

Rumsfeld said he thought little of that argument. He said the Pentagon
would be "fully transparent" with Moscow about any such conversion
of strategic missiles, so that there was no room for miscalculation.

"There are only a few countries that would have the ability to do anything
about it _ regardless of which type of weapon it was," he said, alluding
to the small number of countries, such as Russia, China and possibly North
Korea, which possess nuclear missiles capable of reaching U.S. territory.

Besides, he added, "everyone in the world would know" that the U.S. missile
was not nuclear "after it hit within 30 minutes" of launch.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700638.html

Bad ideas never die in the Bush adminstration, but this one is positively scary.
Rummy is nuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. who is going to wait 30 minutes to see a benign strike
and who is going to believe this administration about anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm just guessing here but
my guess is they think the flight trajectories and a heads up to Russia and China will prevent a problem. And as Condi says there is opportunity everywhere, all the time. So...if the Bushies are wrong and Russia or China launch when their satellites detect launches from ballistic subs, the mistake can be exploited as a solution to global warming by cooling it with nuclear winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, another war courtesy of the neocons
no one is going to believe a ballistic strike is innocent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rummy + gasoline + matches
= very bad situation for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC