Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking News: UN Authorizes Darfur Peacekeepers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:43 PM
Original message
Breaking News: UN Authorizes Darfur Peacekeepers
From: David Rubenstein, Save Darfur Coalition <darfur@mail.democracyinaction.org>
Date: Aug 31, 2006
Subject: Breaking News: UN Authorizes Darfur Peacekeepers


I have critical news to report.

This morning, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution authorizing a peacekeeping force in Darfur. The presence of a peacekeeping force is the only measure that will provide the security the people of Darfur desperately need.

This morning's vote is unmistakable evidence of the effectiveness that the pressure you, and hundreds of thousands of Darfur activists like you, have applied to world leaders. The international community has shown that the will now exists to end the genocide in Darfur.

Yet, before peacekeepers can be deployed, the resolution says the Sudanese government must first agree to permit them.

This means that we cannot yet let up on the pressure. One way to continue to make your voice heard is to attend the "Save Darfur Now: Voices to End Genocide" rally and concert in New York City's Central Park on September 17. Click here for more information.
If you cannot make it to New York, there are other September 17 events taking place all over the country and the world as part of a Global Day for Darfur. For more information on US events, click here. And for more information on international events, click here.

As always, thank you for everything you do.

Sincerely,

David Rubenstein
Save Darfur Coalition
http://www.savedarfur.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's great news. Should have been done long ago, but better late than
never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. They can't get peacekeepers for Southern Lebanon....
Hope they do better with this effort. I am not holding my breath, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. I smell a secret agenda here.
Edited on Thu Aug-31-06 01:52 PM by Joanne98
If you watched Thomas Barnett's "the Pentagon's New Map" or "Blueprint" you will see the Imperialist agenda is focusing on Central Africa. Just a thought.

Barnett maps out a sweeping new vision for the U.S. military in Blueprint for Action, the sequel to his influential previous book The Pentagon's New Map. He says the U.S. military has a massive doctrinal flaw. It has an unrivalled power to win wars. But it has little ability to win the peace. Witness Iraq, where virtually no thought was given to postwar stabilization and reconstruction. He advocates creating a new Department of Global Security in the U.S. government, tasked with putting countries back on their feet after an armed intervention by U.S. forces. He says the new department would also work to reduce economic and social instability in "disconnected" regions of the developing world. "It all starts with America and yes, it all starts with security," he writes. Barnett's vision is highly U.S.-centric and recalls the "white man's burden" philosophy of British colonial authorities. He advocates "regime change" in North Korea and Venezuela. And his solutions for the problems of the Third World are straight out of a banker's mouth: privatization, deregulation, globalization. But Blueprint for Action is an important account of the current thinking and debates at the highest levels of the Pentagon. --Alex Roslin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. These have been my concerns too. I look at the results of the so
called Peacekeeping mission in Haiti. Over 8000 people were murdered during that time according to a study in the Lancet. I do not believe that the US has a humanitarian agenda in Darfur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Is the Unites States now the only member state of the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-31-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. good, kick for the children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. happy kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clark08 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. "the Sudanese government must first agree"
No, I'm afraid this may be another false start. Here's hoping I'm wrong ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonehalf Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Do you think they will..
...be as effective as they were in _________ (fill in the blanks)
"UN peacekeeper" is an oxymoron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC