Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The War Against the Common Good

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:32 PM
Original message
The War Against the Common Good
Bushspeak: Freedom = freedom to plunder a nation's wealth
Democracy = free market capitalism

When George W Bush uses the words "freedom" or "democracy", he is not talking about civil liberties, or the ability of citizens to freely elect their leaders--no matter how hard he tries to pretend otherwise. He's talking about free market capitalism--the freedom of multinational corporations to plunder a nation's wealth for their own profit. Like another imperialist before him--Woodrow Wilson--Bush seems to think in terms of "making the world safe for democracy," but in his case (and probably in Wilson's case, as well), "democracy" is simply another word for American-style capitalism. When Bush talks about "spreading freedom and democracy" throughout the "greater Middle East", he is talking about making Middle Eastern countries safe for American corporations to operate in, without oversight or restraint or conscience. In this world view, nothing belongs to the people of a country; everything belongs, instead, to whoever holds the reins of power in that country. And this is true, whether we're talking about what BushCo is doing to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, or what they are doing to the people of the United States.

Just as the War on Drugs is actually a War Against the People, the War on Terror is actually a War Against the Common Good. Since the days of FDR, the idea of the Common Good has been sacrosanct, but no more. When Bush and his cronies invaded America and set up a Green Zone in the White House, they immediately began dismantling the safety net that Americans have depended upon since the devastating Depression of the 1930s. BushCo swept into power with a mandate, but not with a mandate from "the people", as they like to pretend. No, Bush's mandate was from his corporate cronies, and was a mandate to gut safety and labor regulations, pollution controls, pension plans (including social security), public health care programs, public school funding, and any other program that might help people at the expense of corporate profit. They came into power talking earnestly about tax "reform" and social security "reform" and public school "reform", as if there was a dire need to reform these programs for the good of the people. Of course, the good of the people had nothing to do with it, unless we're talking about the good of a handful of extremely wealthy people.

The War on Terror (in which Bush ingenuously includes the invasion and occupation of Iraq) is a smokescreen and a diversion, meant to hide what these people are really doing: plundering the national treasure of any country they can get a foothold in, including our own. The War on Terror is not about keeping anyone safe. Judging by their curiously delayed responses to the World Trade Center attacks and Katrina, they obviously couldn't care less about our safety. No, the so-called War on Terror is about helping the weapons industry, the petroleum industry, and any other industry that profits from war and destruction (like KBR and Halliburton and Blackwater) make and keep obscene amounts of money.

To these pirates, the Common Good is a concept every bit as outdated and quaint as the Geneva Conventions. In their immoral world view, what's theirs is theirs, and what's ours is theirs, as well.
There is no "Common Good"--only vast amounts of booty to be plundered. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well said!
Thank you for putting the essence of it all so clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ya got it right....bastids: all of them
THOSE WHO HAVE NO TALENT HAVE NO BUSINESS IN GOV'T

The GOP and their man Bush have no talent/skills for winning anything:

Out witted in war and foolish in Governance, they plow on hoping their guesses result in success. The score shows a disaster 12 years long...the last 5 has been a CLUSTER FUCK of mega proportions.

Bush and his GOP must go if America is to be rescued.

Vote Blue for Gods Sake....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked & recommended - one of the top 5 BEST posts ever,
IMHO. Thank you for saying what I've been thinking but couldn't phrase so elegantly. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Thank you so much for your kind words
BushCo sure gives us a lot to write about, doesn't it? I'm so glad to have found DU!

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Their mantra: "Freedom is on the march"
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 03:06 PM by young_at_heart
I wonder who thinks up these ambiguous slogans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Peggy "thousand-points-of-light" Noonan is famous for that crap.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent... Good short analysis !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a total war against the common good...
They are stealing the "commons" from right under our feet and we're just standing around and letting it happen. Ultimately, people have the power to change it, but they've got to be lulled out of this coma - right now.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rhiannon!
You kick ass, yes, indeed you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Wow, thanks
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Democracy = UNFETTERED CRONY CAPITALISM
If we really had free markets, there wouldn't be so much corporate welfare and pay to play lobbying. There is no level playing field, and no really free market, it's quid pro quo arrangement with the Republican leadership.

I've been thinking this for a while. When Bush talks about freedom, the red staters get all excited, as if he's talking about their freedom. The joke's on them. He has as much contempt for them as he does for us. They're just suckers he can manipulate by tossing out loaded words: freedom, democracy, abortion, gays, Jesus. They fall for it every time.

But this sure makes all Dubya's speeches make a lot more sense, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. "unfettered" = unregulated
Just to point out that regardless of what it's called, a market that is not to work against the common good must be regulated, and therefor is not in actual fact "free".
Though admittedly it does depend on how "free" is defined. After all, we do live in a free society; even back when it was significantly more free than it is now, it was in fact regulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's a good article on the coopting of "democracy"
http://www.stateofnature.org/democracyPromotion.html
Much has been written about US democracy promotion and its role in bringing to power pro-American individuals to reinforce imperial strategic interests in various parts of the world. In particular, William Robinson’s 1996 book, Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony, provides a prescient analysis of the evolution and strategy behind US democracy promotion from the 1980s onwards.

Robinson argues that democracy promotion is aimed at strengthening polyarchy – the rule of a small minority in which mass participation consists of periodic choices in formally free elections managed by competing sections of the elite. Robinson argues that polyarchy’s fixation with the formal act of voting serves to justify the influence and power that comes with possession of material wealth. Democracy promotion thus plays an ideological role in legitimating the division between politics and economics predicated in liberal theory. By concentrating on the form of elections, it serves to justify prodigious concentrations of wealth both within and between nations.

Robinson documents how US foreign policy took a conscious shift in the late 1970s-early 1980s towards a strategy based upon democracy promotion. Rather than solely providing military, economic and political support to unpopular military dictatorships, the US government moved towards attempting to influence and control social and political mobilization ‘from below’. US government functionaries and political elites began to work at diffusing social tensions through a strategy of co-option and managed dissent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for the interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. He is talking about the freedom for him to steal, lie, murder, torture
and rape. He is the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have been saying that since Bremmer brought freedom to Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC