Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Google's New PAC Skews Republican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:06 AM
Original message
Google's New PAC Skews Republican
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/10/21/googles-new-pac-skews-re_e_32222.html

Looks like Google's been watching Fox News — its new Google NetPAC, launched last month, made contributions to three Republicans congressional candidates, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The Merc's Frank Davies reports $1,000 contributions to each of Reps. Heather Wilson of New Mexico, Deborah Pryce of Ohio, and James Sensenbrenner, head of the House Judiciary Committee and sometime gavel-wielding control freak. At least two of the candidates, Wilson and Sensenbrenner, have porfolios that implicate the use and regulation of the Internet.

Three of Google's new lobbyists were drawn from Republican ranks: Jamie Brown, former legislative liaison in the Bush administration, and former GOP senators Connie Mack and Dan Coats (Davies does not mention what proportion of Google's lobbying staff that comprises). According to Davies, in the past Google executives have donated "overwhelmingly to Democrats and liberal groups" (he also notes that Google employees skew Democratic). Google lobbyist Alan Davidson says PAC donations are intended for the building of "long-term relationships with policy-makers" supported "across party lines." To that end, Google also donated $1,000 each to two Democrats candidates, Rep. Anna Eshoo of Palo Alto (where Google HQ is located) and Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan. More here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Google could have more impact on the issue of "Net Neutrality"
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 09:20 AM by Eric J in MN
...without spending a dime.

Just by putting a link to information on "Net Neutrality" on their homepage.

For example, a link to "Save the Internet:"
http://www.savetheinternet.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They could, but if they have any interest in saving the Internet...
...giving money to Sensenbrenner doesn't seem like the place to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. What the fuck ever happened to "DO NO EVIL!?!?!?!" SENSENBRENNER???? WTF??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's because he supports "Net Neutrality" (So do I.)
The fact that James Sensenbrenner is on the right side of one issue is behind Google's support of him.

www.savetheinternet.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm thinking maybe I should grudgingly go along with that.
Based on the premise of rewarding the money-hungry Repukes when they actually do something right.

They need money to re-enforce their positive behaviors in a Pavlovian way.

Google is trying to be "The Repuke Whisperer?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC