George Bush & John Kerry: Blood Brothers

                          by Victor Thorn
                     http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/bloodbrothers.html
                                                                    
 

 
       Following the 2000 presidential race, with memories of Votescam, hanging chads, the debacle
       in Florida and a possible "stolen" election still fresh in our minds, many people are wondering if
       this fall's contest will likewise be marred by some form of vote tampering or electronic ballot
       rigging. But in all honesty, the New World Order power brokers aren't even concerned with such
       notions this year.
 
       Why? Because if John Kerry gets the Democratic nomination and runs against George Bush,
       both candidates will already by bought, sold, and controlled. It won't matter to the ruling elite who
       ultimately wins because both of these men have already surrendered their souls to the evil cabal
       years ago.
 
       What makes me arrive at this conclusion? Well, for starters, George Bush and John Kerry are
       both graduates of Yale University - that long-heralded bastion of the Eastern establishment. In
       addition, each of these men were members of Skull & Bones, the most exclusive secret
       society/fraternity in America, and prime breeding ground for the CIA and Council on Foreign
       Relations (CFR).
 
       But wait; there's more. John Kerry's wife, Teresa, was formerly married to Pennsylvania Senator
       John Heinz. Guess what college he attended. Answer: Yale. And guess what notorious fraternity
       he pledged to. Skull & Bones! Now ask yourself: what are the odds that both presidential
       candidates went to the same school, belonged to the same secret society, and that one of their
       ives was married to TWO different Skull & Bonesmen? It's infinitesimal ... off the charts.
 
       To make matters even stranger, Teresa Kerry's widowed husband also had direct ties to the
       Bush family. According to researcher Rodney Stich in Defrauding America, when George Bush
       Sr. and CIA Director William Casey engineered the October Surprise to bribe Iranian officials
       into retaining U.S. hostages until after the 1980 elections, two of the passengers on Bush's BAC
       111 flight to Paris were Senator John Heinz, along with Senator John Tower from Texas.....

If the charges and allegations in this article are true, I have even less 'enthusiasm' for Kerry -- he just sounds like another 'establishment' candidate who will promise a lot to get elected and then do the corporate bidding anyway. How depressing!
 
            OTHER GREAT ARTICLES  http://69.28.73.17/pastissues.html  
 
 
 
            Paid For By American's For Truth, Veterans For Justice! Awaken America!
 

The only reason I haven't pronounced Campaign 2004 a lost cause is the fact that there are other races besides the presidency - races that are, unfortunately, being ignored. Of course, the establishment will do everything it can to muck up those races, too.

But if we're lucky, maybe we can get an honest person elected to some high office. Maybe.

....same as the old boss

69.28.73.17

If it has an IP address, it must be true!

:)

You post crap from a BS site. Google Victor Thorn,you will find a dung heap. Please do better,you insult intelligent people.

Are the specific allegations true or not? Was Heinz a fellow Bones man? Did Kerry cover up for his fellow Bones men regarding Iran-contra? What are the historical facts? I mean the outcome of the hearing referred to should be part of the public record.

then perhaps the article deserves being insulted.

you agree with the author's conclusion -- that Bush and Kerry are bound together as Bones men, committed to serving each other and the ruling class. I would like to see Kerry expose this stupid, secret society and disavow any loyalty to it or any of its other members and whatever other creepy stuff they had to promise. The only people he should serve, should he become president, is the people of the United States.

You asked what the historical facts are. My response: If historical facts are not present in the article, why bother posting it?

I would like to see Kerry redistribute his wife's wealth to the poor and beat up my ex-boyfriend, but I don't expect it to happen.

I assume that's tongue-in-cheek, since it is not John Kerry's wealth to dispose of. Also, I believe that a lot of that wealth is tied up in the John Heinz Foundation, which, I understand, is very philanthropic. Is my memory right? Did both Heinz and Tower die unexpectedly? If so, t'would be a strange circumstance.

Will YOU beat up my ex-boyfriend?

Yeah they are blood brothers. Now another topic Does anyone know what the two other states besides idaho are that disallow absentee votes IF you die before the election date.

Why not vote for what we really want? Is this the time to compromise? I think not.

The clearly unambiguous alternative to Bush:
Dennis Kucinich
http://www.kucinich.us

kerry is tweedledee bush is tweedledumb

Many people here did not have Kerry as their first choice. It appears as if Democratic primary voters have made their choice (though it's not over yet). There can only be one nominee, and the sooner we unite around him the sooner we can redirect our anger toward the Great Satan in the White House.

Gee, I wonder why.

reading the DU that the subject warrants having its own forum.

It's hyped up conspiracy nut crap.

Was Watergate a famous instance of hyped up conspiracy nut crap?

Conspiracies are very real - and they can be very dangerous. Skull and Bones really exists, and its members include three generations of Bush's and John Kerry.

You can't pronounce it harmless when we don't know all the facts (because it's so secretive).

And besides that great unknown, there's also Kerry's record. He's no Paul Wellstone.

(Re: the hearing headed up by KerrY) 'The testimony that took place during these trials (both in open and closed door sessions) was quite possibly the most damning ever against our federal government, yet mysteriously, nearly all of it was suppressed and not widely reported in the mainstream media. Why? Senator Kerry as a Democrat, had every opportunity to blast a Republican administration out of the water, yet he inexplicably remained silent and the status quo prevailed. Could it be that someone tapped him on the shoulder and told him that if he played his cards right and kept these sordid matters hush-hush, he would be rewarded sometime in the future?"

Here's a contemporaneous clip and link to another piece saying the real scandal of this scandal was the way it was covered up by the media. http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/mediacia.html
Why didn't Kerry blast it everywhere?



THE SCANDAL BEHIND THE SCANDAL:



How the Mainstream Media Kept the Lid on CIA-Contra Drug Story
by Joel Bleifuss

An August 18, San Jose Mercury News investigative reporter Gary Webb began a three-part series describing how contra-connected Nicaraguan drug dealers sold tons of cocaine to street gangs in South Central Los Angeles and then turned the profits over to the ClA's contra army. The Nicaraguans, Webb wrote, supplied much of this cheap cocaine to dope dealer Ricky "Freeway Rick" Ross, who "turned the cocaine powder into crack and wholesaled it to gangs across the country."

One profoundly troubling aspect of this burgeoning scandal is how the mainstream news media have chosen to cover-or not cover-this story. That the contras were smuggling drugs is outrageous, but that has been reported in the alternative press, including In These Times, for years. (See "Is North network cocaine connected?" December 10, 1986.) That the Reagan and Bush administrations tried to cover up their knowledge of these operations is also old news. (See "A key witness dies; a controversy lives on," December 24, 1986.) Nonetheless, the nation's newspapers of record, particularly the Washington Post, have failed to give the story broader exposure. Over the past decade, the Post has covered the contra-cocaine connection only when it could not be ignored.

Perhaps there is a method to the madness. Jim Naureckas, the editor of Extra!, the newsletter of the media watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), covered Iran-contra for In These Times. "In the `80s, to say `Contras' and `drugs' together marked you as a radical conspiracy theorist," says Naureckas. But now, he adds, "the story has gone from `That's ridiculous,' to `everybody knows about it,' without ever being news in between."

On April 14, 1989, the Post devoted one brief story to the final report of the Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations, headed by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), which found that contras were involved in drug trafficking and that government agencies

were aware of that involvement. After trivializing the report's findings, Post reporter Michael Isikoff concluded that claims of drug trafficking by high-level contras "could not be substantiated." ..... http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/mediacia.html

In fact after reading that piece from the Baltimore Chronicle (is that a crackpot conspiracy rag too?) Kerry should still be shouting out this story from the roof tops!!!

They've even got pictures! Oswald passing out commie pamphlets, records of his travels in Soviet Union, he even married a Russky! The man was, in the immortal words of Barbara Stanwyck, red as the Daily Worker and twice as sore. And who benefitted? a Democrat! :scared: Clearly a left-wing conspiracy to abort a generation of YAFfers and future conservative politicians of special promise, like Georgie.

Sometimes a fraternity is just a fraternity. But not at Yale, that hotbed of neanderthal blood-drinking wingnuts. How eerily symbolic---and do we really know what's in that ketchup? Tonight John Kerry's score is 9 out of 11 states. 9/11! Coincidence? Or a sinister signal to activate the forces of evil?

This is inflammatory.



DU Moderator