Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The ISG draws a line:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:51 PM
Original message
The ISG draws a line:
Timetable vs. stay the course. The only other position to debate is between stay or leave sometime beyond the report's 2008 vague time frame.

Hayden gets it and is advocating for a set deadline.

The IRG is a step in the right direction (took the neocons/wingnuts out of the equation), but it's flawed:

The Baker Report tries to have it both ways on some crucial issues. While it says it is against a large increase in troops, it then says it “could, however, support a short-term redeployment or surge of American combat forces to stabilize Baghdad, or to speed up the training and equipping mission.”

And while it echoes John Kerry’s 2004 campaign comment that “the President should state that the United States does not seek permanent military bases in Iraq,” the report in the next sentence adds: “If the Iraqi government were to request a temporary base or bases, then the U.S. government could consider that request as it would in the case of any other government.”

Kerry Says, Others Agree - Part 1 and Part 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. You have to have dealines in order to force the Iraqi's hands....
It's like a dad yelling up to his kids goffing around past bedtime...

Don't make me come up there, yells the father...

The the giggling still goes on....

I'm warning you, yells the father....

And yet another round of giggling erupts...

and so on and so on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can't use that analogy
unless the crutch element (U.S. military) is added:

Dad yelling up to his kids, who are making too much noise while playing with dad's video games, which they are allowed to play with until their bedtime.

Noise continues, dad goes up yanks a couple of games.

The noise goes on/or not.

Bedtime comes, dad pulls plug on system, takes it to another room to enjoy.

The noise still goes on/or not...eventually they fall asleep.

Dad video system isn't broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Part 3
Kerry Says, Others Agree - Part 3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC