Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tin Foil Hat: Baker, Cheney, Cheney's Trip, Saudi Arabia, and I.S.G. report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:04 PM
Original message
Tin Foil Hat: Baker, Cheney, Cheney's Trip, Saudi Arabia, and I.S.G. report
Slap on your hat and tell me if I am nuts or not.

Thoughts bouncing round my noggin

1) So the I.S.G. Report said the the Saudis were funding the Sunni insurgents in Iraq. (#96)

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2708253&page=1

b) Baker headed the I.S.G. group.

lll) The Saudis' attorney for fighting off law suits by the relatives the 9-11 dead is Baker

4) Baker tipped off the Saudis about what condition # 96 of the report said.

e) They called Dick Cheney over to talk about it.

Vll) Is that a black helicopter over my house?

8) If bush and Cheney knew that the Saudis were funding some of the
people shooting Americans would that be grounds for impeachment or
for all the family members of the victims of 9-11 & troops in Iraq to
go to the White House and rip bush from it?

:tinfoilhat:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would say there are grounds for impeachment of Bush and Cheney,
even without this. The detainee bill alone is likely enough.

But yes, if what you said did indeed happen, it would be even more proof that both need to be removed from office ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with ya babe
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 03:09 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let me get this straight
If any unknown individuals from Saudi Arabia financially support attackers - we're supposed to cut off all ties and impeach anybody in our government who attempts another strategy.

But if the actual country of Iran financially supports attackers - we're supposed to talk to them and impeach anybody in our government who says a word against them.

Does that about sum up the absolutely insane view of the far-left on this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Who has called for impeachment of anyone who speaks against Iran?
I've never heard this but I don't read everything.

In my opinion, the whole thing comes down to oil. In Bush's view, we can get oil two ways: we either invade oil-rich countries and control their resources, or oil-rich countries blackmail us into paying absurd prices for it. He's actually used the word, "blackmail," when talking about oil, so I'm not making that part up.

But where does Saudi Arabia fit in? Does Bush think they're blackmailing us or do they just have us over a barrel (no pun intended)? Does Bush even know the meaning of the word "blackmail?"

I don't know but, just as I haven't heard anything about impeachment for speaking out against Iran, neither have I heard anything about impeachment for cutting ties with Saudi Arabia. If you've read about either of these things, I'd, seriously, like to have some links so that I can read it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. O.K. because Iran is funding some of the attackers on American troops
we should not look @ other factions such as the Saudis supporting
the Sunnis who in many cases were the former Saddam military folk
and is killing Americans with I.E.D.s made from left over military stocks
under Saddam?

So the Iranian backed Shi ites kill the Americans deader than the Saudi
backed Sunni?

I am might be full bore big goose bat shit crazy but I am not stupid.

I smell right wing infiltrator all over you please post every vote you have
every made in any election along with your place of employment .....

I am betting "Creative Response Concepts."

I know things ..... :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Except you said Bush was picking a fight with Iran
"Once again this administration wants to pick a fight with another country."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x926706

Now you're mad because he isn't picking a fight with Saudi Arabia.

The stunning inconsistency is what is full bore big goose bat shit crazy, in your words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. where is the word Iran in my post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "standing at the precipice with Iran"
Or do your words have an expiration date?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sorry not my words
From a thread by somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Excuse me - 'no war with Iran'
You clearly have two different standards for Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are not nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Did I ever tell you that you are my Fav?


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll go you one better...remember all the beheadings in 2004 leading up to the election?
I don't remember seeing or hearing about any beheadings since then, so I have to ask:

1) Who benefits from so many beheadings hitting the American news just prior to the 2004 election?
2) Who benefits in having Geo. W. Bush "re-elected" in November of 2004?
3) Who does beheadings, thought of as heinous in Western terms, as a routine form of execution?
4) Who benefits in having Saddam overthrown and the oil price propped up?
5) Who has been IDed as a nation that supports terrorism?
6) Who had issued passports to 15 of the 19 attackers on 9/11?
7) Who has the Bush Family as business partners?
8) Who's son, who masterminded the 9/11 attacks, has never been found?

Answer: The Saudis!

What would it take for the Saudis to orchestra beheadings (to terrorize Americans) in an attempt to keep Bush in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. They also own large shares of AOL/TIME-Warner/CNN. That explains the heavy antiKerry bias
at CNN for the last 4 years.

Kerry straight out said the Saudi relationship was going to change significantly - he knew how terrorists were really being funded all the way back through BCCI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC