Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Experience is not a prerequisite for governing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:10 PM
Original message
Experience is not a prerequisite for governing.
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not neccessarily "for" Obama in 2008, and I too would feel more comfortable perhaps if he had more experience. But I do like him, and find him to be possibly the most appealing of the candidates who are assumed to be running.

But I must say, as far as the experience issue goes, it is not now and never has been a requirement in American politics. Lincoln's only experience in national government was two years in the House of Representatives, where he ended up getting kicked out after a speech against the Mexican-American War, 14 years prior to running for President. George Washington's only political qualification for office beyond having won the war was as a Virginia provincial legislator.

Yes, you can point at Bush as an example of inexperience being bad, but experience was the least of Bush's problems: he's insular, a rigid thinker, simple minded, and always convinced that he's right, among other things. Even being president hasn't cured him of that. So I don't see it as being a valid comparison.

Yes, it would be nice to have everything. But given the choice between someone, say like John Kerry, who has experience but not that sense of vitality and charisma, and somebody like Obama, I'd choose the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even a bad actor can be a govenor and president.
Just play the part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why don't you fast forward and build a monument for the guy?
At the bottom it will say, "Barack Obama -- He Called Paul Wellstone a Gadfly".

Pretty optimistic for someone who hasn't connected himself to one controversial position or piece of legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hear hear!
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 07:30 PM by beaconess
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. no, but often it's a prerequisite to winning
As the opposition will make it a central issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The fact that the opposition makes it a central issue doesn't make it a prerequisite to winning
Candidates with less lengthy resumes often beat their more "experienced" opponents.

JFK v. Richard Nixon
Jimmy Carter v. Gerald Ford
Ronald Reagan v. Jimmy Carter
Bill Clinton v. George H.W. Bush
George W. Bush v. Al Gore (we all know Bush didn't "win," but he got close enough to steal it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Largely correct...a couple minor points...
George Washington was also President of the Constitutional Convention. His presence and subsequent support for the Constitution, plus the assumption that he would be the first President, insured its passage...this was a significant addition to his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent points about some of our greatest presidents! K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. no....
.... but it might be a prerequisite for getting elected. And that's a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC